That is why I am THE Superstar Cultmaster.Vrede's rubbing off on you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMsCeDxmNCw
That is why I am THE Superstar Cultmaster.Vrede's rubbing off on you.
"The state of Tennessee made multiple attempts to execute Zagorski over the course of nearly a decade."O Really wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 12:05 pmZagorski had been on death row 34 years, the second-longest in Tennessee.
The state still provided him a luxurious life for 34 years, and now people are still out protesting. If he'd just been put away for life, no parole, the state would have spent less and nobody would remember he existed.
I just heard there was a "professional" wrestler by that name in the WWE. He's bought all Jesse Ventura's feather boas.
14-year-olds, a pregnant woman and puppies - he just needs a disabled veteran to hit for the cycle.'Welcome to the white man's world': Cops allegedly beat up 2 Latino boys during arrest
A suspended Springfield, Mass., police officer, Gregg Bigda, is now facing federal charges that he beat up a 14-year-old Latino boy and another teenager while they were under arrest. He also allegedly spat on one of the young boys and told him, “Welcome to the white man’s world,” according to the indictment.
Bigda and Steven Vigneault, a narcotics detective who resigned from the department in 2016, were charged with excessive force on Wednesday morning in relation to the February 2016 arrest of a group of teens suspected of stealing an undercover police vehicle, according to MassLive.com.
While the physical assault against the teens was not captured on video, a 30-minute surveillance video recording uploaded on YouTube features Bigda threatening to beat up one of the boys, unleash the K-9 dogs on him, and “crush your skull.”
In the video, he also threatened to plant drugs on one of the teenagers. “I’m not hampered by the f***ing truth ’cause I don’t give a f***!” Bigda is heard saying. “People like you belong in jail. I’ll charge you with whatever. I’ll stick a f***ing kilo of coke in your pocket and put you away for 15 years.”
The teens involved with the alleged theft claim that the driver, Vigneault, who left the car while he was inside a pizza shop, was drunk the night of their arrest. Vigneault was indicted on excessive force charges along with Bigda. The suit charges that the teens were kicked in the face while handcuffed and bitten by police dogs.
Bigda and Vigneault pleaded not guilty to the charges in court on Wednesday. They were both released on bail and could face up to 15 years in prison. Bigda has been suspended without pay, according to the Springfield police department.
According to MassLive.com, this is not Bigda’s first offense. The lawsuit alleges he has also been accused of assaulting a pregnant woman, declaring “I hate Puerto Ricans,” and macing puppies to death.
Zagorski is a real case/event, Leo. You're still wanting a different world. Only way to do it is to get the law changed. Only way to get the law changed is to scrap the current process. And get a bunch of people elected on a pro-death penalty ticket. Good luck with that.Leo Lyons wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 2:19 pm
This is what I mean about two appeals and three bullets. There was no doubt of any innocence, he chose his method of execution, therefore, he was as "guilty as sin". Expensive to execute a prisoner? Bulls*it. They WASTED more money on this piece of human garbage than should be allowed.
O Really wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:42 pmZagorski is a real case/event, Leo.
He prefers his fantasy world.
You're still wanting a different world. Only way to do it is to get the law changed....
And the Constitution.
Good luck with that.
Yep.
But the expense isn't in just killing him. It's the extra costs of maintaining a "death row," legal expenses, etc. that wouldn't be there with a straight life sentence.
IRL, this is what Leo is advocating for, though he just can't admit. Hence the goofy, unrealistic fantasies in a desperate attempt to rationalize what his team is actually doing.
O Really wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:42 pmZagorski is a real case/event, Leo. You're still wanting a different world. Only way to do it is to get the law changed. Only way to get the law changed is to scrap the current process. And get a bunch of people elected on a pro-death penalty ticket. Good luck with that.
I'm not especially "wanting" anything; I'm expressing an opinion.
But the expense isn't in just killing him. It's the extra costs of maintaining a "death row," legal expenses, etc. that wouldn't be there with a straight life sentence.
A straight life sentence carries identical cost burdens to the taxpayers in the appeals process. We've heard the stories of inmates filing lawsuit after lawsuits, appeals after appeals in order to burden the system down with his bulls*it that he has a "right" to pursue, and the state has an obligation to hear or judge it's merits. Once incarcerated, an inmate should not be allowed to pull this crap; only through an attorney, and the number of times should be limited.
Not quite. Often a convict will file an appeal for one reason or another, but they don't usually go very far unless there really are valid grounds for the appeal, and all the paper crap prisoners file pro se are routinely handled by the office grunts. Death penalty appeals, however, have to be taken more seriously because a minor error can cause a big problem, and because there are many more grounds tossed up for reversing than in other cases, and because they attract a lot of public attention, and because they're usually filed by death penalty specialists or experts who know what they're doing, such as through the Innocence Project who also have goals that go past the individual case. Death penalty cases do in fact cost more than life sentences. Why am I even yapping about it? Look it up. Source of your choice.Leo Lyons wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 10:04 pm
A straight life sentence carries identical cost burdens to the taxpayers in the appeals process. We've heard the stories of inmates filing lawsuit after lawsuits, appeals after appeals in order to burden the system down with his bulls*it that he has a "right" to pursue, and the state has an obligation to hear or judge it's merits. Once incarcerated, an inmate should not be allowed to pull this crap; only through an attorney, and the number of times should be limited.