War on Women

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
billy.pilgrim
Captain
Posts: 4282
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by billy.pilgrim » Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:47 am

Leo Lyons wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 8:23 am
billy.pilgrim wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 7:32 am
Vrede too wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 6:30 am
There are submarines with 4,001 crew? Wow.
She's informed in ways we little people can't begin to imagine. Just ask her.
:lol: :lol:


"What do you think is going to happen when you go on a submarine for 12 months with 4,000 horny soldiers?"


Despite the overcrowding, she should smell a rat to begin with. Submarines don't have soldiers as crew.
Generally speaking, people who think their own shit smells like roses can't smell rats either.
George Carlin said “The owners know the truth. It’s called the American dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.”

User avatar
Leo Lyons
General
Posts: 791
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am

Re: War on Women

Unread post by Leo Lyons » Fri Jul 13, 2018 1:55 pm

O Really wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:46 am
Crew on the biggest subs is, I think, well under 200. I'd think it's unlikely that these sailors are any hornier than the average sailor on other vessels.
200 or 4,000 .... look at it from the opposite angle. She'll die happy. Unless she's :gayhappy:

User avatar
Leo Lyons
General
Posts: 791
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am

Re: War on Women

Unread post by Leo Lyons » Fri Jul 13, 2018 1:56 pm

billy.pilgrim wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:47 am
Leo Lyons wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 8:23 am
billy.pilgrim wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 7:32 am
Vrede too wrote:
Fri Jul 13, 2018 6:30 am
There are submarines with 4,001 crew? Wow.
She's informed in ways we little people can't begin to imagine. Just ask her.
:lol: :lol:


"What do you think is going to happen when you go on a submarine for 12 months with 4,000 horny soldiers?"


Despite the overcrowding, she should smell a rat to begin with. Submarines don't have soldiers as crew.
Generally speaking, people who think their own shit smells like roses can't smell rats either.
:lol:

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 13126
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am

Re: War on Women

Unread post by Vrede too » Sun Jul 15, 2018 9:20 am

Image

Trump Administration Shocks Global Health Officials by Opposing Pro-Breastfeeding Resolution

When global health officials gathered this spring for the World Health Assembly, they thought a resolution that would encourage breast-feeding would be one of the easiest items on their agenda. After all, its purpose was simple enough: recognizing decades of research that says breast milk is healthiest for babies and calling on countries should limit misleading marketing claims that state otherwise. But then the U.S. delegation got involved, and didn’t just oppose the resolution but began threatening countries that wanted to introduce the measure, reveals the New York Times.

The U.S. officials wanted delegates at the U.N.-affiliated World Health Assembly to tone down the resolution in what looked like an effort to side with manufacturers of infant formula. Specifically, they wanted the document to not include language that would call on countries to “protect, promote, and support breastfeeding” while also slashing calls to restrict marketing of food products that are seen as detrimental for young children.

Ecuador had planned to introduce the measure but after threats of economic retaliation it decided to drop the initiative. Advocates then began searching for another sponsor “but at least a dozen countries, most of them poor nations in Africa and Latin America, backed off, citing fears of retaliation,” reports the New York Times. Russia then took up the issue and decided to introduce the resolution. The American officials did not threaten Russia.

“We were astonished, appalled and also saddened,” said Patti Rundall, the policy director of the British advocacy group Baby Milk Action. “What happened was tantamount to blackmail.” The Department of Health and Human Services defended the opposition to the resolution saying that it “placed unnecessary hurdles for mothers seeking to provide nutrition to their children.”
:wtf:
So many liberals, so little time. :P

Post Reply