Despite PINO's lies about what happened and praise for the terrorists. It'll be interesting to see what the FBI, state and local authorities do, if anything.
Could of been a lot more, but still not bad. trump loses again.
Thanks! What happened with the criminal investigations? Too bad it's the majority Dem San Marcos taxpayers who suffer and not the asshole MAGAt cops and the asshole MAGA terrorists. 1312.
Unscientific:
Do you think the settlement with Wendy Davis was warranted or unwarranted?
Warranted 71%, including me
Unwarranted 28%
I'm not sure 1%
I wonder if they shot all of them from that same helicopter the photo was taken from. I'd be wary of getting in a helicopter with three or four armed wingnuts. The only way I'd go is if each of them jumped out after shooting three coyotes. And they had to jump holding their rifles perpendicular to their chest as they fell so that they'd be impaled and possibly shot on impact as well.
I wonder if they shot all of them from that same helicopter the photo was taken from. I'd be wary of getting in a helicopter with three or four armed wingnuts. The only way I'd go is if each of them jumped out after shooting three coyotes. And they had to jump holding their rifles perpendicular to their chest as they fell so that they'd be impaled and possibly shot on impact as well.
The tripods imply long distance shooting on the ground, but These days aerial pics are more likely to be from a drone.
I wonder if they shot all of them from that same helicopter the photo was taken from. I'd be wary of getting in a helicopter with three or four armed wingnuts. The only way I'd go is if each of them jumped out after shooting three coyotes. And they had to jump holding their rifles perpendicular to their chest as they fell so that they'd be impaled and possibly shot on impact as well.
The tripods imply long distance shooting on the ground, but These days aerial pics are more likely to be from a drone.
You're probably right. But I remember seeing stories in the past about people shooting wolves from a helicopter. I think it was about ten years ago. In the future, wolves will be flying helicopters and shooting humans on the ground.
So let's say I want to "do my own research" on the question "does Donald Trump still have direct control over the US military as "Commander Chief".
First relevant item from the google says "Nonsense claim that 'Trump is in complete control of the country' | Fact check", but then, that was USA Today, so it is obviously a lie. So I guess I should take a "no" from the lying USA Today as a confirmation that it's true.
"Quora" says "no" but you can't rely on them, so that's another confirmation.
Nothing else on the google, so they're probably suppressing the truth.
Well, let's check a database of everything Trump has said on the subject. Did he ever say he's still in charge of the military? Nope, so he must be because he wouldn't have lied about anything.
Let's check LexisNexis and see if there is any precedent or caselaw where a former President* retained control over the military. Nope. But there are secret courts whose decisions don't get reported so since it's not there it must be true.
Point proved. See how easy that was. Do your own research.
... According to his website, Fournier now leads the group Radical Alert, which aims to expose "radicals" and their "hate" who have "taken over American college campuses." ...
The epitome of misogynist ammosexual RW "radical hate"