Wingnut Conspiracists Go Full Retard!

[Stinger]

These nutjobs make Birfers look intelligent.

Far-right extremist/extremely dumbass dumbasses are claiming that Sandy Hook was a hoax perpetrated by the liberals to take away our guns.

Here are a couple of sites. Unfortunately, there are plenty more.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspirac ... -hoax.html

http://scifake.com/hoax-of-the-century- ... advocates/

These people own weapons legally AND they vote.

We're fucked.

[bannination]

We're fucked.

Yes we are.... since it was already handled in the gun threads, I'll just steer the topic a bit to the "We're fucked" part.

Lower I.Q. and idiotic people tend to reproduce more they don't even understand they can't afford it, while smarter people understand the true expense of having kids. The population growth is out of control, and the dumb ones will win, they'll consume all resources, but they won't plan for the future of where we will get our next resource. (Global Warming deniers X 1000).

We are truly fucked, Idiocracy if you will.

[Stinger]

Should have known you guys were all over this. I did look for a thread (I was sure something this bizarre would merit its own thread." I've been really busy the last couple of days and haven't had time to check the stupids.

Too bad Turdwhistle's not around. This is right up his alley.

"No proof? No problem. JUST BELIEVE!!!!"

[Stinger]

Help me with this.

The unbelievabledumbasses who fall for this shit somehow manage to pull of this hoax without the 10,000 or so people of Sandy Hook knowing that it's a hoax?

How can someone believe something like that?

You not only have to suspend common sense, you have to suspend stupidity and come in somewhere way below that.

[bannination]

Help me with this.

The unbelievabledumbasses who fall for this shit somehow manage to pull of this hoax without the 10,000 or so people of Sandy Hook knowing that it's a hoax?

How can someone believe something like that?

You not only have to suspend common sense, you have to suspend stupidity and come in somewhere way below that.

When people want to believe in things without any evidence it leads to all sorts of weird things.

[Stinger]

Yeah like you people believing that the Kenyan as president is anything but a disaster....WEIRD.

What's weirder is the willfully ignorant declaring that 1) the president is a Kenyan when he's not, and 2) declaring he's a disaster when every single economic indicator is up since his inauguration in 2009.

I guess the willfully ignorant are anti-Americans who consider economic improvement a "disaster."

Dumbasses.

The video (if real) showing the "devastated" dad laughing moments before coming to the microphone is actually very weird; would you act this way the day after your daughter was murdered? I imagine that I would have trouble standing up or breathing for days afterward. Nice guy.

Actually, it's not weird for anyone with any knowledge of human nature and the grief process. That would, of course, exclude you.

Scientific American recently reported:

oscillation between sadness and mirth repeated itself in study after study … Time and again, a grief-stricken person’s expression would change from dejection to laughter and back.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... -true-grit

Normal guy.

[rstrong]

Yeah like you people believing that the Kenyan as president is anything but a disaster....WEIRD.

Aaaaaand I'm STILL waiting for one of the neocons here to describe what Obama policy is such a disaster, that hasn't also been Republican policy in recent years.

About the only major difference is that he's taken a more libertarian stance on LGBT rights, but that's hardly a disaster. And he's taken a free enterprise approach to the space program, while the Republicans insist on a Big Government socialist policy.

He's been essentially a moderate Republican, slightly to the right of Ronald Reagan, sticking with more recent Republican economic, military and foreign and healthcare policy.

[Stinger]

Yeah like you people believing that the Kenyan as president is anything but a disaster....WEIRD.

Aaaaaand I'm STILL waiting for one of the neocons here to describe what Obama policy is such a disaster, that hasn't also been Republican policy in recent years.

About the only major difference is that he's taken a more libertarian stance on LGBT rights, but that's hardly a disaster. And he's taken a free enterprise approach to the space program, while the Republicans insist on a Big Government socialist policy.

He's been essentially a moderate Republican, slightly to the right of Ronald Reagan, sticking with more recent Republican economic, military and foreign and healthcare policy.

Bush Lite . . . without all the wars.

[Leo Lyons]

We're fucked.

Yes we are.... I'll just steer the topic a bit to the "We're fucked" part.
Lower I.Q. and idiotic people.... We are truly fucked....

Lower I.Q. and idiotic people....'nuff said.

[JTA]

Prior to the 2016 election, Obama will use a false flag event to allow him to declare martial law and keep his position as president indefinitely.

I was the first to say this on this forum, so the internet points are mine.

[rstrong]

Prior to the 2016 election, Obama will use a false flag event to allow him to declare martial law and keep his position as president indefinitely.

Check out sites like InfoWars, PrisonPlanet and WorldNetDaily, and their network of chemically imbalanced bloggers. They've successfully predicted 2548 out of the last zero false flag incidents.

In 2004 they repeatedly told us that a false flag incident and martial law would cause the cancellation of the 2004 election, so that Bush II could hang on to power.

In 2006 they repeatedly told us that a false flag incident and martial law would cause the cancellation of the mid-term elections, so that the Republicans could hang on to Congress.

In 2008 they repeatedly told us that a false flag incident and martial law would cause the cancellation of the 2008 election, so that Bush II could hang on to power.

In late 2008 they repeatedly told us that a false flag incident and martial law would prevent the handover of power from Bush II to Obama.

In 2010 they repeatedly told us that a false flag incident and martial law would cause the cancellation of the 2010 mid-term election, so that the Democrats could hang on to Congress.

In 2012 they repeatedly told us that a false flag incident and martial law would cause the cancellation of the 2012 election, so that Obama could hang on to power.

On the old forum r.j.roberts parroted the claim that the 2012 election would be cancelled by gun violence in Mexico. You know, just like the Zapatista uprising in Mexico led to the cancellation of elections and martial law in America in 2004-2006.

Along the way - before SARS and H1N1 and Hurricane Katrina - they repeatedly told us that a virus outbreak or natural disaster or terrorist attack would be the pretext for martial law. And yet 9/11 didn't result in cancelled elections or martial law. Neither did SARS or H1N1. Neither did Hurricane Katrina or Hurricane Sandy.

Anyone who disbelieved any of this was dismissed as "sheeple" or part of The Conspiracy.

There was never any doubt that someone would come along and make the same claims about the 2016 election.

I was the first to say this on this forum, so the internet points are mine.

Yes. We are all refreshed and challenged by originality of your claim.

[JTA]

Prior to the 2016 election, Obama will use a false flag event to allow him to declare martial law and keep his position as president indefinitely.

Check out sites like InfoWars, PrisonPlanet and WorldNetDaily, and their network of chemically imbalanced bloggers. They've successfully predicted 2548 out of the last zero false flag incidents.

In 2004 they repeatedly told us that a false flag incident and martial law would cause the cancellation of the 2004 election, so that Bush II could hang on to power.

In 2006 they repeatedly told us that a false flag incident and martial law would cause the cancellation of the mid-term elections, so that the Republicans could hang on to Congress.

In 2008 they repeatedly told us that a false flag incident and martial law would cause the cancellation of the 2008 election, so that Bush II could hang on to power.

In late 2008 they repeatedly told us that a false flag incident and martial law would prevent the handover of power from Bush II to Obama.

In 2010 they repeatedly told us that a false flag incident and martial law would cause the cancellation of the 2010 mid-term election, so that the Democrats could hang on to Congress.

In 2012 they repeatedly told us that a false flag incident and martial law would cause the cancellation of the 2012 election, so that Obama could hang on to power.

On the old forum r.j.roberts parroted the claim that the 2012 election would be cancelled by gun violence in Mexico. You know, just like the Zapatista uprising in Mexico led to the cancellation of elections and martial law in America in 2004-2006.

Along the way - before SARS and H1N1 and Hurricane Katrina - they repeatedly told us that a virus outbreak or natural disaster or terrorist attack would be the pretext for martial law. And yet 9/11 didn't result in cancelled elections or martial law. Neither did SARS or H1N1. Neither did Hurricane Katrina or Hurricane Sandy.

Anyone who disbelieved any of this was dismissed as "sheeple" or part of The Conspiracy.

There was never any doubt that someone would come along and make the same claims about the 2016 election.

I was the first to say this on this forum, so the internet points are mine.

Yes. We are all refreshed and challenged by originality of your claim.

It's very possible that Obama was behind the 911 attacks.

[bannination]

It's very possible that Obama was behind the 911 attacks.

[rstrong]

Bush Lite . . . without all the wars.

Or Dick Cheney with less torture and more drone strikes.

The US is now arguably fighting on the Pakistan government's side of a civil war.

As of this week the US now has boots on the ground and drones in Mali.

And then there's that bit of excitement in Libya last year.

The trend here - also in post-occupation Iraq - is that the US isn't trying to fight the wars by itself. It isn't using "shock and awe" bombing campaigns to, er, win the hearts and minds of the people. It isn't occupying the countries. Instead it's aiding one side with much lower cost but still effective training, air support, intelligence and other aid.

[Stinger]

Bush Lite . . . without all the wars.

Or Dick Cheney with less torture and more drone strikes.

And without friends getting shot in the face.

As of this week the US now has boots on the ground and drones in Mali.

The trainers are to go to Niger, Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Senegal, Togo and Ghana, to train their troops to go fight in Mali. We don't have boots on the ground in Mali yet.

[O Really]

It's very possible that Obama was behind the 911 attacks.

Give it up, dude....you're creative, but it's hard for a rational person to think up stuff more unlikely than what the loonies think up for real.

[Crock Hunter]

Check out sites like InfoWars, PrisonPlanet and WorldNetDaily, and their network of chemically imbalanced bloggers. .

Speak not of these perfidious sites for their very mention has within it the power to summon loathsome and pernicious demons or dare I say worse.. the DeLudicrous Sextus....

[Stinger]

Check out sites like InfoWars, PrisonPlanet and WorldNetDaily, and their network of chemically imbalanced bloggers. .

Speak not of these perfidious sites for their very mention has within it the power to summon loathsome and pernicious demons or dare I say worse.. the DeLudicrous Sextus....

Don't forget Canada Free Press. They'll post anything.

[rstrong]

Check out sites like InfoWars, PrisonPlanet and WorldNetDaily, and their network of chemically imbalanced bloggers. .

Don't forget Canada Free Press. They'll post anything.

Yup. There's an extreme-right Canadian wingnut listed as the "editor" - but the content is just the usual extreme-right American news feed. The same feed probably has similar sites with other countries' names tacked on, so they can say "See? People in other countries agree!"

[Crock Hunter]

The same feed probably has similar sites with other countries' names tacked on, so they can say "See? People in other countries agree!"

Indeed.. as is the case with Faux News.. They will concoct a report in the morning .. e.g. "Does Nancy Pelosi really have a broom collection numbering in the thousands" .. and by nightfall be quoting their own story ... "Reports surface about Pelosi's use of witchcraft".. By the next day WND is reporting that Pelosi has a bill before congress to fund a new Quidditch Pitch at Hogwarts and Limbaugh is holding up a potion that was reportedly made by Nancy for his radio audience to see....

Hilarity ensues..