The message offered additional advice that should be instructive to any further discussions. It instructed that the opinions of others should never be considered in a discussion unless you are already in full agreement with the facts and opinions being discussed.
Total lie, see below.
What a fool I was ...
Agreed, you were.
What a sleazy, lying, sackless crybaby you are! My actual PM to banni about the broken links:
To: bannination, billy.pilgrim Subject: Opps ...
Crap, I screwed up. As a result of billy.pilgrim's choice to bring his whiny internet illiteracy to (this Dog thread), I linked (poorly) ... and billy.pilgrim never noticed when he quoted me.
So, I'm asking you to delete the links from the posts. If you would rather delete entire posts, so be it.
FTR, I'm CCing billy.pilgrim out of a sense of integrity that he entirely lacks. However, they're my posts and I don't care what his opinion is....
Sorry, I only blame myself for these links and any hassle this causes you. Here are the posts, each with 2 links ...
Interesting that you blame me for your fuckup. Maybe a little self-reflection is in order.
You fail English, yet again.
I do blame you for bringing your "whiny internet illiteracy to (this Dog thread)". However, I CLEARLY take full and sole responsibility for my fuck-up. Find someone literate to explain: "Opps! Crap, I screwed up.... I only blame myself for these links and any hassle this causes you," to you.
Are their too many syllables in "I ... I"?
I would then suggest an apology, but you just don't have the balls for that.
I notice that you did not include banni in your crybaby reply. Obviously, you know that he would say that I exclusively blamed myself for the flub, wuss.
billy.pilgrim stupidly whined again and I replied:
... I would then suggest an apology, but you just don't have the balls for that.
I notice that you did not include banni in your crybaby reply. Obviously, you know that he would say that I exclusively blamed myself for the flub, wuss.
... I would then suggest an apology, but you just don't have the balls for that.
I notice that you did not include banni in your crybaby reply. Obviously, you know that he would say that I exclusively blamed myself for the flub, wuss.
As predicted.
Wussy billy.pilgrim hasn't even opened that reply, choosing to throw his lying, foot-stomping widdle temper tantrum here, instead.
Hey everyone - I edited a few posts in this thread that had links to forum posts that were broken. Just noting for transparency.
Thanks
Thank you for your service.
Damn, my post disappeared during Preview. Later.
So sorry guys. I've only just now received a message informing me that I am responsible for Vrede's posts and that my entire lack of integrity is making his super duper great sense of integrity to do things.
I had not realized that my lack of importance was so instrumentally important to his postings. I will make an effort to understand this.
The message offered additional advice that should be instructive to any further discussions. It instructed that the opinions of others should never be considered in a discussion unless you are already in full agreement with the facts and opinions being discussed.
What a fool I was to have let discussions and links on this forum cause me to reach out through research and additional personal contacts and completely change my long held belief about Confederate monuments. Which begs the question, how far back should I go to eliminate life changes I've made because I listened to different views.
Yep, better to go around with bananas in your ears because we all already know it all before we got here. Experts we are, each and only one.
again, I am so so sorry to have made him post something regrettable and I will make an effort to refrain from making him dance.
Perhaps you're just a slow learner?
That appears to be my problem too!
LOL
Perhaps I am, but I still a little confused about how he can have a discussion if he won't consider anything but what he already knows or believes. I thought that communication required everyone to try to understand each other, but he made it clear that he doesn't listen.
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”
Perhaps I am, but I still a little confused about how he can have a discussion if he won't consider anything but what he already knows or believes. I thought that communication required everyone to try to understand each other, but he made it clear that he doesn't listen.
Wussy projection, as usual. My belief is irrelevant and YOU are cowering from 5! sources. Along with now cowering from being busted lying about our PM exchange (above) and about nonexistent name calling, you're still cowering from:
... The only context I saw that wasn't negative related to someone new to a forum might lurk to get a feel for the characters before posting.
Lurk is a negative term. Observe might work better. Especially when you know that the person you are attempting to communicate with used a different definition than you.
No need to lie, you supplied the definitions.
Not that I have much hope given the hole you've dug for yourself, but let's look at an example of a definition that you are falsely calling "negative". This is the first one I posted, the one that should have ended the debate if you were rational and responsible:
... Chiefly Computers. to read or observe an ongoing discussion without participating in it, as on a message board.
We have both read or observed threads in this forum today without participating in them. Is that "negative"? Of course not.
There are posters like O Really (mostly) and probably others that have read or observed our debate today and have chosen not to join in, which is fine. Is that "negative"? Of course not.
We all have days or times of day when we read or observed this entire forum without participating in it by posting. Is that "negative"? Of course not, and you're lying to claim otherwise.
Prove me wrong instead of endlessly relying on your feelings. Where are those "many dictionaries" you claimed?
Poor baby, examples, questions and definitions are sooo hard, awww.
So strange that he brags about refusing to listen to different ideas.
I'm still willing to discuss, but not under those conditions.
You lie, again. I've been begging you for "different ideas": Where are those "many dictionaries" you claimed?
Then, you cower from backing up your claim about my citations being “negative” and the examples and questions about them. That ain’t “willing to discuss”.
What I am not interested in is your whiny, incessant, 5! times proven wrong feelings. You have brought zero debate to the debate.
A clown with a flamethrower still has a flamethrower.
-- Charlie Sykes on MSNBC
1312. ETTD.
So strange that he brags about refusing to listen to different ideas.
I'm still willing to discuss, but not under those conditions.
You lie, again. I've been begging you for "different ideas": Where are those "many dictionaries" you claimed?
Then, you cower from backing up your claim about my citations being “negative” and the examples and questions about them. That ain’t “willing to discuss”.
What I am not interested in is your whiny, incessant, 5! times proven wrong feelings. You have brought zero debate to the debate.
Yep, vrede's rules for communication include, "I don't care what his opinion is"
Seems a little one sided, but when you already know it all like vrede, you can't stop to listen to other opinions.
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”
Yep, vrede's rules for communication include, "I don't care what his opinion is"
Seems a little one sided, but when you already know it all like vrede, you can't stop to listen to other opinions.
It's 5! definitions. Your "opinion" AND mine are irrelevant, crybaby. Then, I just proved that your "opinion" about our PMs was a complete fabrication. You cower and defect, as usual.
Where are those "many dictionaries" you claimed?
A clown with a flamethrower still has a flamethrower.
-- Charlie Sykes on MSNBC
1312. ETTD.
Yep, vrede's rules for communication include, "I don't care what his opinion is"
Seems a little one sided, but when you already know it all like vrede, you can't stop to listen to other opinions.
It's 5! definitions. Your "opinion" AND mine are irrelevant, crybaby. Then, I just proved that your "opinion" about our PMs was a complete fabrication. You cower and defect, as usual.
Where are those "many dictionaries" you claimed?
It's quoted. You refuse to consider other opinions. You said it.
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”
It's quoted. You refuse to consider other opinions. You said it.
You refuse to accept 5! qualified sources and you cower from providing the ones you claimed, just like you're cowering from our quoted PM exchange that you lied about. You are entitled to opinions, not to invent facts on your "special" widdle planet, and not to call absolutely factual matters ones of opinion. That's just desperate lying when you've screwed up and don't have the balls to admit it.
A clown with a flamethrower still has a flamethrower.
-- Charlie Sykes on MSNBC
1312. ETTD.
It's quoted. You refuse to consider other opinions. You said it.
You refuse to accept 5! qualified sources and you cower from providing the ones you claimed, just like you're cowering from our quoted PM exchange that you lied about. You are entitled to opinions, not to invent facts on your "special" widdle planet, and not to call absolutely factual matters ones of opinion. That's just desperate lying when you've screwed up and don't have the balls to admit it.
Deflect much?
Running away from your own quote.
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”
You deflect and lie, again. I've addressed head on too many times to count the fact that you cower from - opinions, yours OR mine, are irrelevant in the face of 5! qualified sources and a transcript.
Where are those "many dictionaries" you claimed? Oh that's right, you've been deflecting for weeks from the fact that they don't exist and you got busted lying about them.
A clown with a flamethrower still has a flamethrower.
-- Charlie Sykes on MSNBC
1312. ETTD.
Looks like TaliFAN identifies with crybaby cretin Det.Thorn from 9 years ago and a different forum. That's real desperation. Very apt, but still a hoot that s/he is too stupid to know what an awful thing that is to admit. Just to cite one example from among so many - despite being uber-con Det.Thorn got banned from the same CPF that pussy TaliFAN now sucks up to.
Whine on, TaliFAN, whine on, each and every time is my victory! Thank you.
A clown with a flamethrower still has a flamethrower.
-- Charlie Sykes on MSNBC
1312. ETTD.
Very much so. The TaliFan longs to live under something like Sharia law but of a Christian stripe. He's too stupid to know that those two things are the same thing in a different wrapper. Hilarious.
