The homophobic thread :>

[O Really]

Some may like to educate themselves on the term "cracker." http://www.npr.org/blogs/codeswitch/201 ... n-crackers
"cracker" does not equal "nigger"

[Cannonpointer]

Some may like to educate themselves on the term "cracker." http://www.npr.org/blogs/codeswitch/201 ... n-crackers
"cracker" does not equal "nigger"

So, if I post some quaint historical revisionism about the origin of the word nigger, is THAT word no longer a racist utterance?

How silly are you? Quite silly, apparently.

[Cannonpointer]

CRACKER = NIGGER (childishly screeched 9 times)

Not really, given the relative power dynamics bla bla bla.

Yeah, yeah, bla bla - he was only beating zimm's head in, after all. Poor powerless little sport fighting thug.

I got your power dynamic swinging, parrot.

[homerfobe]

Calif. Health Insurers Must Cover Fertility Treatments for Gay Couples

Under a new measure signed into law by California Governor Jerry Brown, beginning next year health insurance plans in the state will have to cover fertility treatments for both homosexual couples and single individuals. Previously the state’s insurance code included no such stipulations, giving insurers the option of extending or denying coverage to non-traditional patients desiring the treatment. With the new law, however, the code has been amended to prohibit insurers from withholding fertility treatments based on “age, ancestry, color, disability, domestic partner status, gender, gender expression, gender identity, genetic information, marital status, national origin, sex or sexual orientation.”

The bill was sponsored by 70-year-old state assemblyman Tom Ammiano, a San Francisco Democrat whose own 16-year homosexual partnership ended in 1994 when the man he was living with died of AIDS. (Awww....aint that sad)

wtf. Now queers have the right to insured fertility treatments for what? Lets see, the men (that's an oxymoron) want to be fertile so they can buffugg in the hopes of giving birth to live turds to raise as their own kids, hoping they don't die of AIDS or some exotic strain of disease known to inflict the asshole.
The women, providing which one can be distinguished as the female, want to twat twitch in hopes their tongue or dildo can miraculously become fertile and give birth to a larger tongue or dildo. Yep that's the ticket. Fertilize them bastards.

[homerfobe]

Yes, homerfobe, we get your vulgar and childish obsession and hatred for the American principle of equality under the law. Too bad, you've lost, move to Iran or Russia or grow up and get over it already.

Equality my ass. There's no faggot equal to a normal person. As far as moving:
go yourself.

Fwiw, I don't think any fertility treatments should be covered for anyone.
We've got enough people on the planet and there's no socially beneficial reason the state should obligate insurers to help create more.
There we agree. Especially queers.

[homerfobe]

Obsessed. Try a gay bar or online. Good luck.

If that was my thing, I'm certain you would never tell me where your bar is or the name of your website. It is interesting to see that those words are a turn on for you. You make a list of them to drool over.

[Cannonpointer]

Yes, homerfobe, we get your vulgar and childish obsession and hatred for the American principle of equality under the law. Too bad, you've lost, move to Iran or Russia or grow up and get over it already.

Fwiw, I don't think any fertility treatments should be covered for anyone. We've got enough people on the planet and there's no socially beneficial reason the state should obligate insurers to help create more.

The only thing deceptive is YOU pretending that you would have been just as "liberal" with a kid who was gonna confront as creepy ass nigger, race-baiting failboy. Everyone knows you lie.

[GoCubsGo]

John Boehner Opposes ENDA, Dealing Blow To Bill's Chances

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/0 ... 1383575154

Figures.

[Cannonpointer]

The ones that care have argued against you, not me.

No, son.

They have been as quiet as crickets on the issue of how you WOULD have responded, if the thug had been white and called his older black annoyer a nigger, before surreptitiously encircling him, and then confronting him by surprise.

Quiet as crickets, son. They may not like me, but they KNOW you, and they prize their dignity, so they stand mute.

Racist fraudboy. Everyone can see your true colors. You're as liberal as my asscrack, progtard. Smiley face.

[Cannonpointer]

Vote this week - Call Your Senators: Pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) Now!

This is a fraud. Your graph shows states where specific, by-name anti-discrimination legislation is not on the books. That does not mean employers can shit-can you for being gay. That's like saying a state without domestic violence laws is prevented from punishing domestic violence under any other statute: Disturbing the peace, assault, attempted murder, assault with intent to do serious bodily harm, etc. Nope - in states without domestic violence laws, it is legal to beat your wife.

Yep, wife beating is perfectly legal in those estates. Yep.

You just lie and lie and lie, Nancy. You lie and you lie and you lie. And I think you're too stupid to even know you are lying. I think you actually swallow your own talking points.

[O Really]

Vote this week - Call Your Senators: Pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) Now!

This is a fraud. Your graph shows states where specific, by-name anti-discrimination legislation is not on the books. That does not mean employers can shit-can you for being gay. .

Actually, that is exactly what it means.
In "employment at will" an employer can shit-can you for "a good reason, bad reason, or no reason at all" - as long as it's not an illegal reason. So if sexual orientation isn't a protected group, there is no legal basis for a discrimination charge if that's the basis for termination. Sure, individual cases can get complex - with mixed motive, fuzzy facts, yada, but if being gay is the or one of the reasons, the worker has no protection in those states. Might be some cities with anti-discrimination ordinances. But employers don't usually just admit up front they're firing someone for being gay.

[homerfobe]

1.5 million views in 1 day.

Just look at the expressions on those kid's faces. "He's marrying another man?" "A woman is going to marry another woman?"
Even those kids knows that's fucked up. So I wonder what was the point in showing those kids those videos. Just another attempt to indoctrinate their minds that perverted faggotry is normal. (normal: conforming to the standard or the common type; usual; not abnormal; regular; natural.)
Now I wonder what the kids will be told as to how 2 men or 2 women consummate sex. Think they'll be told that one man will fudge pack the other man or play lollipop with his penis and the women will take turns slurping the other's piss-hole or cramming foreign objects into the same?
Disgusting, perverted bastards.

[O Really]

Which is it - that you didn't hear what they had to say or that they used too big words for you? Whatever, clearly kids even talking about gays conjured a whole bunch of titillating images for you. You won't need to take your laptop to bed with you tonight.

He didn't really watch the vid. He's just imagining from the two kids' expressions up front. If he had actually seen the ones who thought "that was soooo cute..." etc., or the little kid who asked, without shock, "are they gay", he'd have croaked and we wouldn't have to deal with him further.

[Cannonpointer]

Vote this week - Call Your Senators: Pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) Now!

This is a fraud. Your graph shows states where specific, by-name anti-discrimination legislation is not on the books. That does not mean employers can shit-can you for being gay. .

Actually, that is exactly what it means.
In "employment at will" an employer can shit-can you for "a good reason, bad reason, or no reason at all" - as long as it's not an illegal reason. So if sexual orientation isn't a protected group, there is no legal basis for a discrimination charge if that's the basis for termination. Sure, individual cases can get complex - with mixed motive, fuzzy facts, yada, but if being gay is the or one of the reasons, the worker has no protection in those states. Might be some cities with anti-discrimination ordinances. But employers don't usually just admit up front they're firing someone for being gay.

Hoss, I have worked HR in "employment at will" states - specifically, your southern neighbor, down there in glamorous and tony Myrtle Beach. I can assure you that running people off for being gay is not what any employer would ever dare to do. Even in right to work states, where employers have a great deal of latitude, companies are very cagey in their firing and tend to use progressive discipline and documentation to avoid losing their asses in court.

I am pro- gay marriage and have been since the 90s - the first time I ever heard of the subject or considered it. I have worked for gay rights, and I have volunteered at women's clinics, confronting protestors and walking clients past them. I am certainly not averse to having sexual orientation formally added to protected status. But the pretense that you can lose your job over sexual orientation comes right out of My Little Ponyville - ain't how the world works.

[Cannonpointer]

1.5 million views in 1 day.

Just look at the expressions on those kid's faces. "He's marrying another man?" "A woman is going to marry another woman?"
Even those kids knows that's fucked up. So I wonder what was the point in showing those kids those videos. Just another attempt to indoctrinate their minds that perverted faggotry is normal. (normal: conforming to the standard or the common type; usual; not abnormal; regular; natural.)
Now I wonder what the kids will be told as to how 2 men or 2 women consummate sex. Think they'll be told that one man will fudge pack the other man or play lollipop with his penis and the women will take turns slurping the other's piss-hole or cramming foreign objects into the same?
Disgusting, perverted bastards.

Discussing sexual orientation with little kids, who are sexually androgynous, is the work of perverts and a form of molestation. If I went to the home of any moron that approves of this shit, and started talking about sex to his kids, I'd be rightly arrested - if I was lucky. What kind of sick shit is this???

That's like these "Sally has two mommies" books. WTF are people thinking? Their KIDS. Leave em alone about SEX, ya fucking perverts.

[Cannonpointer]

1.5 million views in 1 day.

You APPROVE of this, ya sick little twist? Fuckin' mo. Fuckin' mo-by-proxy.

To the CAMPS!

[O Really]

Hoss, I have worked HR in "employment at will" states - specifically, your southern neighbor, down there in glamorous and tony Myrtle Beach. ...

I'm sure you have. HR people thinking they understand the law has long been a prime source of income for the employment law firms.

No, most employers don't just say, "you're fired because you're gay." but they could, and absent some local or contractual protections, the employee would have no legal recourse. Many employers also have their own policies in which they commit to non-discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. But they don't have to.

BTW, you don't have a good understanding of "right to work" either.

[Cannonpointer]

Hoss, I have worked HR in "employment at will" states - specifically, your southern neighbor, down there in glamorous and tony Myrtle Beach. ...

I'm sure you have. HR people thinking they understand the law has long been a prime source of income for the employment law firms.

No, most employers don't just say, "you're fired because you're gay." but they could, and absent some local or contractual protections, the employee would have no legal recourse. Many employers also have their own policies in which they commit to non-discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. But they don't have to.

BTW, you don't have a good understanding of "right to work" either.

I had a rabbi in the labor department specifically because I did NOT think I understood the law. But I do know that wrongful termination suits are brought in right to work states every day - and firing someone for sexual orientation is a nonstarter. I live in a right to work state, and I know a gay attorney whose meat and taters is sexual discrimination lawsuits against employers. If she has any proof at all that an employer discriminated based on sexual preference, she plays hardball.

Again, I don't prefer civil courts in place of regulation. I'm all for anti-discrimination laws. But the idea that a boss can walk up and say, "I don't let faggots work my counter - get out!" is just silly.

[O Really]

Again, I don't prefer civil courts in place of regulation. I'm all for anti-discrimination laws. But the idea that a boss can walk up and say, "I don't let faggots work my counter - get out!" is just silly.

You do enjoy weasling, don't you? That statement, in that manner, might get a harassment lawsuit, but the same guy could call the faggot into the office, and say, "I'm sorry, but I didn't know you were homosexual when I hired you, and I don't want you working here." And if that were the only issue, the employee would have no recourse. But again, employers don't usually do that. They have policies, they have corporate philosophies against sexual orientation discrimination, they generally don't care if a person is gay if they're doing a good job. But bottom line, if any factor is not protected, it can be used legally as a reason for firing.

You still need to look up what "right to work" means.

[Cannonpointer]

...I live in a right to work state, and I know a gay attorney whose meat and taters is sexual discrimination lawsuits against employers. If she has any proof at all that an employer discriminated based on sexual preference, she plays hardball...

As the map I posted CLEARLY shows, NV is one of the states where sexual preference discrimination is illegal. You do know which one is NV, right? And, O Really is correct, "right to work" has nothing to do with it.

I stand corrected.

Besides, you just contradictorily told us:

...I can assure you that running people off for being gay is not what any employer would ever dare to do...

I hope your gay attorney acquaintance takes other kinds of cases.

She does - general employment law. I think she works with on the job injuries, as well.