N.C. Registers over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 112

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
Ragin Rebel
Red Shirt
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:48 pm

N.C. Registers over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 112

Unread post by Ragin Rebel »

North Carolina Registers Over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 112

http://www.examiner.com/article/north-c ... age-of-112
NC chart.png
NC chart.png (30.47 KiB) Viewed 1336 times
There are obviously verifiable vote fraud problems in North Carolina.

In 2010 those problems surfaced meaningfully as indicated in the below voter fraud post from an earlier Charlotte Conservative Examiner article:

Perhaps in an effort to promote North Carolina as one of the healthiest States in the Nation, this latest voter twist comes to us from Susan Myrick of the Civitas Institute in North Carolina--not to be confused with Rep. Sue Myrick of NC who is unrelated. In a radio interview with local WBT Anchor Tara Servatious, Susan reports that she has been keeping track of the number of votes in North Carolina of individuals over the age of 110 years and apparently we have quite a few, over 410 of the 110 year olds--to be exact-- actually voted via absentee ballot on October the 28th. Yes indeed, now it would appear that good ole NC has the market cornered on the Centenarian vote.



But it gets worse when we note from another concerned voter, who indicated the following explanation, which goes but one full measure further to explain what's happening in NC during this voting season of , perhaps, persistent political zombies:

I overheard a nice lady about 70 telling her friend the following: "Yes, I voted today."

"Going back tomorrow too."

"They took us to a place that don't ask names and don't write nothing down. They give $20 each time."

She then handed her friend a card I couldn't see and told her friend to call the number.


Talk about throwing "Granny" under the bus!
" I will stand with the Muslim's should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." ------Barack Hussein Obama

The shift occurred September 11, 2001 and he kept his word on that one.
It was evident again on September 11, 2012.

User avatar
Crock Hunter
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:40 pm
Location: THIS USER IS BANNED

Re: N.C. Registers over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 1

Unread post by Crock Hunter »

Ragin Rebel wrote:There are obviously verifiable vote fraud problems in North Carolina.
Cheesus Randy.. This "110 year old" voter bullshit was debunked years ago... . just how stupid are you???


What about those "dead" voters? Susan Myrick at Civitas Review blogged that "110 Year Olds Vote Strong in NC" [10]

Is that true?

NO.

From email correspondence with the NC State Board of Elections:
——– Original Message ——–
Subject: RE: Civitas writes that 2,214 “110 year olds” voted in NC
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:17:24 -0400
From: Wright, Don
To: Joyce McCloy

Joyce,

When a county does not have a birth date for a voter, they use a default date for that voters birth date and most counties use 1/1/1900. If these voters show up to vote, the pollworkers inquire as to their correct birth date and that information is added. Over the past few years, we have reduced the number of default birth date voters. And after this election the number of default birth date voters will be reduced even further.

There were millions of voters transferred from the county paper VR records to the Statewide VR database around 2000. Some of the county’s older VR data did not have the voter’s birth date and it was not required at the time that voter registered. Since that time, we have be able to reduce the number of such voters down to a little over two thousand.

Sincerely,

Don Wright
General Counsel
NC State Board of Elections

. . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. ..

Plus numbnuts.. A Voter I.D. requirement would have no effect on this WHATSOEVER... .

Damn... you people are stupid.. .. ... .. .
`~~~:< .. Welcome to the Swamp.. .. Swim Fast..

User avatar
Ragin Rebel
Red Shirt
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:48 pm

Re: N.C. Registers over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 1

Unread post by Ragin Rebel »

Crock Hunter wrote:
Ragin Rebel wrote:There are obviously verifiable vote fraud problems in North Carolina.
Cheesus Randy.. This "110 year old" voter bullshit was debunked years ago... . just how stupid are you???


What about those "dead" voters? Susan Myrick at Civitas Review blogged that "110 Year Olds Vote Strong in NC" [10]

Is that true?

NO.

From email correspondence with the NC State Board of Elections:
——– Original Message ——–
Subject: RE: Civitas writes that 2,214 “110 year olds” voted in NC
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:17:24 -0400
From: Wright, Don
To: Joyce McCloy

Joyce,

When a county does not have a birth date for a voter, they use a default date for that voters birth date and most counties use 1/1/1900. If these voters show up to vote, the pollworkers inquire as to their correct birth date and that information is added. Over the past few years, we have reduced the number of default birth date voters. And after this election the number of default birth date voters will be reduced even further.

There were millions of voters transferred from the county paper VR records to the Statewide VR database around 2000. Some of the county’s older VR data did not have the voter’s birth date and it was not required at the time that voter registered. Since that time, we have be able to reduce the number of such voters down to a little over two thousand.

Sincerely,

Don Wright
General Counsel
NC State Board of Elections

. . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. ..

Plus numbnuts.. A Voter I.D. requirement would have no effect on this WHATSOEVER... .

Damn... you people are stupid.. .. ... .. .

Crock Of, you should really check the news feeds. The story is out there and it's recent :

The Examiner
North Carolina Registers Over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 112
ELECTIONS 2012 OCTOBER 21, 2012 BY: BARRY SECREST

And you have debunked nothing, you only appear to have been the final word. But as usual, your word ain't worth "Shit"! Try reading the article for once before making a damn fool of yourself.

:lol: :lol: :lol: You know, you've been in a mighty pissy mood since Obama has lost 2 debates and Romney is gaining in the polling. Does it mess your mind up that bad? :lol: :lol: Go play with the other children and let the adults handle things. :lol: :lol: :lol:
" I will stand with the Muslim's should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." ------Barack Hussein Obama

The shift occurred September 11, 2001 and he kept his word on that one.
It was evident again on September 11, 2012.

User avatar
Crock Hunter
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:40 pm
Location: THIS USER IS BANNED

Re: N.C. Registers over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 1

Unread post by Crock Hunter »

Vrede wrote:One wingnut citing another wingnut as proof. :lol:

It's not even a "news feed", it's a column.
Randy is allergic to facts.. .. or maybe it's the bee's wax I use in Crock's Patented "Fact" Suppositories.. . :lol:
`~~~:< .. Welcome to the Swamp.. .. Swim Fast..

User avatar
Guest
Red Shirt
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:43 am

Re: N.C. Registers over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 1

Unread post by Guest »

Crock Hunter wrote:Cheesus Randy.. This "110 year old" voter bullshit was debunked years ago... . just how stupid are you???
Forum rules
Loose Rules:
1. Don't be a dick.
2. Please, no personal attacks. Prove the posters information is wrong. Don't be babies.
3. If there is a thread already covering a topic, please do not start another one.
4. Do not call out someone by their real life identity, keep it as anonymous as possible please. These posts types of posts may be deleted on a case by case basis.

User avatar
Guest
Red Shirt
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:43 am

Re: N.C. Registers over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 1

Unread post by Guest »

Crock Hunter wrote:
Vrede wrote:One wingnut citing another wingnut as proof. :lol:
It's not even a "news feed", it's a column.
Randy is allergic to facts.. ..
Forum rules
Loose Rules:
1. Don't be a dick.
2. Please, no personal attacks. Prove the posters information is wrong. Don't be babies.
3. If there is a thread already covering a topic, please do not start another one.
4. Do not call out someone by their real life identity, keep it as anonymous as possible please. These posts types of posts may be deleted on a case by case basis.

User avatar
Crock Hunter
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:40 pm
Location: THIS USER IS BANNED

Re: N.C. Registers over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 1

Unread post by Crock Hunter »

Guest wrote:
Crock Hunter wrote:
Vrede wrote:One wingnut citing another wingnut as proof. :lol:
It's not even a "news feed", it's a column.
Randy is allergic to facts.. ..
Forum rules
Loose Rules:
1. Don't be a dick.
2. Please, no personal attacks. Prove the posters information is wrong. Don't be babies.
3. If there is a thread already covering a topic, please do not start another one.
4. Do not call out someone by their real life identity, keep it as anonymous as possible please. These posts types of posts may be deleted on a case by case basis.
Sooo.. Now that you've accomplished violating Rule 1 . .. .How do you know that "Randy" is his real name? Or did you just recognize him by his idiotic comments like the rest of us did. .. ?
`~~~:< .. Welcome to the Swamp.. .. Swim Fast..

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: N.C. Registers over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 1

Unread post by Stinger »

Ragin Rebel wrote: Crock Of, you should really check the news feeds. The story is out there and it's recent :

The Examiner
North Carolina Registers Over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 112
ELECTIONS 2012 OCTOBER 21, 2012 BY: BARRY SECREST

And you have debunked nothing, you only appear to have been the final word. But as usual, your word ain't worth "Shit"! Try reading the article for once before making a damn fool of yourself.

:lol: :lol: :lol: You know, you've been in a mighty pissy mood since Obama has lost 2 debates and Romney is gaining in the polling. Does it mess your mind up that bad? :lol: :lol: Go play with the other children and let the adults handle things. :lol: :lol: :lol:
ImageImageImageImageImageImage

Damn, that was funny. You give him the facts, and he still tries to claim that it's true.

The story isn't in the newsfeed. It's in the examiner.com, which is a place where any fool can post . . . and any other fool can read and chug the Kool Aid.

Ever hear of critical judgment? I didn't think so.

It's a frickin' blogger. No more reliable than any of the Freeper crap that's been posted around here.

Image

Post Reply