I can see your point about giving the government the power to decide who lives and who dies. Most people, despite how objective they may claim to be, are still somewhat governed by emotions, subjective opinions, and innate prejudices. Some more so, some less so than others. There's simply no escaping that reality in my opinion since we're shaped by past experiences. It seems like you oppose executions because there could be some sliver of possibility the individual could be innocent, and that allowing the government the power over life and death opens up the possibility of a sliding down a slippery slope to other worrisome possibilities.Vrede wrote:"painlessly" for a murderer is not a huge consideration for me, my issue is with the pain caused to society by executions. Unlike many so-called cons, I don't trust government with that power and don't think it makes the world less dangerous.
I'm fairly confident that we will eventually end the death penalty here, I'm not going to speculate on what future punishments we devise. For now, life without possibility of parole suits me.
By pains that executions cause society, are you referring to the info you posted above that states that executions are more costly in terms of money than simply housing inmates in prison for the rest of their lives? Or the statistic you posted that points out that states that haven't outlawed executions are typically more violent? Does this prove that making executions illegal would curb violent crime? I agree with O Really that executions aren't really a good deterrent, which is what I assume you were getting at with that statistic. Regardless, if we use the individual in the example above, I suppose whatever option costs society less and does the least amount of harm to society and other individuals who may cross his path after his incarceration is the better option to go with since that individual is essentially dead to society anyway.
One last question for anyone who may know: I'm no expert on how the criminal justice system works, but if someone commits an especially heinous crime, are they guaranteed to be locked away by themselves with minimal contact with other inmates and prison staff? Are death row inmates generally locked up alone? The reason I ask is does housing someone that's especially demented in prison put even more people at risk as opposed to executing them?