Why is Supsalemgr...

[bannination]

Good god, they have to solve a captcha everytime they post over there? Talk about annoying.

[Boatrocker]

Three or four posts and it goes away. They are a timid bunch, those teatards. Completely unwilling to engage in anything but reach-arounds.

[Boatrocker]

Okay, took me about 40 minutes to get banned. Not a single insult, not a single name called. Merely asking for verification and offering non-emotional opinion. No debate offered in return. No surprise.

Hey, Solar, I know you lurk in here- you and your bitch supr- and I just want to point out that you are a cowardly pussy. Gutless. Dickless. Marinated in bullshit rhetoric, but thoroughly unequipped to put forth any debate, or even defend your bullshit.

Craven and insecure are you.

I think we have a new visiting troll.

Make that "Had", a troll.

Pretty sure it was Boatrocker from the BRD forum as he posted about gettung the boot.

That's a good boy! What a good stooge bitch you are! Yes, 'e is! Here's a treat!
Be sure and tell all the teacrackers what I said, since Solar is trying to intimidate anyone (besides his little bitch) who peeks in here!

[bannination]

I thought it'd be fun to make an account and post crazy wing nut things. It's not though, for one it's hard to top them, and two, no one questions any amount of bullshit you post, doesn't even matter how far fetched.

[Boatrocker]

I thought it'd be fun to make an account and post crazy wing nut things. It's not though, for one it's hard to top them, and two, no one questions any amount of bullshit you post, doesn't even matter how far fetched.

Far-fetched wingnuttery is welcome and encouraged. Not so much facts and informed rebuttal. Check out the few posts I made and see what set PolarSolar off on a rampage of threats.

[Boatrocker]

They lack the mental capacity to debate without name calling, denigrating, and deflecting from the actual topic at hand. Funny how Boatrocker, ombudsman, bannination and vrede sit over at BDF, talk about everything that goes on over here, and yet lack the guts to come over under those screen names and attempt actual debate without all their usual nonsense. It's either that they are spineless cowards or they know that they can not debate without everything I listed above which will not be tolerated here.

He got bitch-smacked by PolarSolar for "attracting trolls." He hates it that we talk about him and his sandbox, which is an excellent reason to keep doing so.
These inbreds are a case study in projection.

[bannination]

Good old Bowhunter hiding in his censored forum accusing us of not debating. If he's been reading over here like he claims he'd know lots of people try to post over there but are banned immediately. That's with no name calling, denigrating, and deflecting from the actual topic at hand.... (Which is what bobo was doing in that thread... but doesn't get banned for.)

[Sixty Two]

Remember all the wingnuttery a couple of years ago about the Whitehouse setting up a site to collect and respond to wingnuttery? In the wingnuts "minds" it was some dictatorial plot to retaliate against wingnuts. Looks like Supsalemgr has now taken on the role that they'd created entirely in their small, paranoid fantasies - snooping here while being too cowardly to post and then being Solar's little "stooge bitch" in helping to ensure that retaliation happens at CPF.

Solar is not about nothing.... What man would want his woman to call herself a toy. :-0?>

O! I know…. A little boy want a toy…. A real man need a WOMAN!

[Bungalow Bill]

He has the uncanny ability to see right into the hearts of gay folks.:


I would suspect most gay couples would be totally satisfied with a legal civil union
that privides the same benefits as being married. It is the radical libs who want to
redefine marriage just for their own selfish political reasons. They don't want a solution
as then they would lose it as an issue against the GOP.

[Boatrocker]

Think "she" might just be "his" kinky alter ego?

Most of them seem to harbor some gender confusion, if not outright latency. Homofob, for example?

[Sixty Two]

The little boy can't make her mind up.... What the hell she want.... A toy or a WOMAN!

Ok! i know what Solar is.... A Transgender.

[Crock Hunter]

What man would want his woman to call herself a toy.

It probably isn't her fault.. . I'm sure we've all known women that because of years of abuse from fathers and boyfriends have no self-worth. .. Solar being the ultimate control freak (as we've witnessed over on the ironically named CPF) can't relate to educated self-confident women so he seeks out these "toys" that he can control. .. .. ...

She has my sympathy.. let's hope she can escape that abusive relationship and get help.. . .

[Bungalow Bill]

I should have made it clearer that it came from SuperDuperSM.

This is another fairly common nutjob theme. People who have been
supporting gay marriage for years when it was unpopular are suddenly
doing it to have a issue they can use against the GOP. Yeah, sure.
So glad to see the wingnuts going bonkers when they see this thing
is becoming a total loser for them and there's not much they can do
about it. Sweet.

[Bungalow Bill]

Yep. some pols, mostly Democrats, are suddenly jumping on the issue. Apparently
Kay Hagan thinks it will be more of a help than a harm in 2014. Guess we might find
out if she was right next year. But there were folks, mostly liberals, who were supporting
gay rights, inclduing gay marriage, when it was still unpopular. They were not doing so
for selfish poltical reasons or to bait the GOP, as SSM has it.

[Leo Lyons]

A thread about supsalmgr !!! It appears the moonbats are following him around in another forum, then coming here to bitch about him because
the other forum won't put up with the bullshit slinging !!!!! Too funny!!

He must kinda grow ya! (Hang in there super!)

[O Really]

Solar or Supsalemgr, BB?

There's no such thing as "the same benefits as being married." It's written into thousands of laws. It is the radical bigots who want to maintain gays in second class status "for their own selfish political reasons." They don't want what is the obvious coming solution, thus prolonging our ability to use the issue "against the GOP." Thanks!

Well,there sorta is. People have been getting "civil unions" at the court house for years, but they call them "marriages." People have been getting "married" in a church for years, but when the minister files the licence, it's a "civil union." If I were making the rules, I'd make the distinction in a "legal marriage" and a "church marriage" much the same as is in some states as a "common law marriage." Anyone with a "legal marriage" is entitled to all benefits related thereto. A "church marriage" gets nothing until they also file civil papers in court. "Common law" marriages would be invalid everywhere. File the papers, dude and dudette, or don't call yourselves "married."

[O Really]

Are you sure? I'm almost positive that marriages, church or JP, are different from civil unions and that civil unions only confer the bennies specified in the enabling law, but not the bennies from all the other thousands of laws that specify "marriage".

Terminology, m'friend. You are right that what is named a "civil union" in those states offering a skim milk marriage for gays is not the same as a "marriage." Nevertheless, the marriage done in court is in fact a "civil union" also. That's where the term came from, but now does indeed refer predominately to the steerage class relationship.

[Boatrocker]

Dunno how it works in NC, but in AL, back in the last week of December, 1976, I went with my fiancé to the probate office in the small town courthouse for our county. We got all the paperwork done, signed, witnessed, and stamped and the probate judge asked if we wanted to go ahead and get the ceremony done. "Normally it's another $20 but we'll waive that this evening since the groom is in the service!"
My pentacostal bred almost-wife declined, explaining that we'd wait till the weekend and make it legal with a church ceremony. Judge said that was fine; anyway, with the paperwork all completed and registered, "Y'all are technically, officially married now! I mean, it ain't like the preacher is gonna send us some oh-fficial notice that he's conducted some religious ceremony; that's got no legal meaning." She blushed deeply but demurred, and we got married the following Saturday night.

Don't know if that's relevant, but it seem to be.

[O Really]

The only parts that matter are: (1) the couple states their intention to be married in front of a witness and someone authorized to sign the license; and (2) filing the paperwork.

The "I take thee" "sickness and health"..."come together in presence of God..." "I declare you..." parts are just for show.

[homerfobe]

Dunno how it works in NC, but in AL, back in the last week of December, 1976, I went with my fiancé to the probate office in the small town courthouse for our county. We got all the paperwork done, signed, witnessed, and stamped and the probate judge asked if we wanted to go ahead and get the ceremony done. "Normally it's another $20 but we'll waive that this evening since the groom is in the service!"
My pentacostal bred almost-wife declined, explaining that we'd wait till the weekend and make it legal with a church ceremony. Judge said that was fine; anyway, with the paperwork all completed and registered, now! I mean, it ain't like the preacher is gonna send us some oh-fficial notice that he's conducted some religious ceremony; that's got no legal meaning." She blushed deeply but demurred, and we got married the following Saturday night. Don't know if that's relevant, but it seem to be.

Alabama. Now I know what your problem is. Was your wife your first or second cousin?
"Y'all was technically, officially married" so as to make the union legal?