Vrede wrote:
"There are tons of secular humanitarian aid groups, including Oxfam, Save the Children USA, Mercy Corps, the International Rescue Committee, CARE, Doctors Without Borders, the Red Cross, AmeriCares, the United Nations and the US government. They provide far more aid faster than Christian charities, without the prejudice that some Christian charities have or the mandatory listening to preaching that some Christian charities require. With all these options, there's no need to create atheist charities. Except for a relative few, it's not like we're a club. We're just very different people that happen to share not needing the man-made crutch of religion."
By being 'secular' means they're an atheist organization?
How about some proof confirming that in order to receive aid, you have to listen to preaching? What do they do, tie 'em down? Also, tell us about the confirmed prejudices you know all about.
If you've got proof, I'll admit I was in error, and will tell the directors of the Christian-aid agencies I know that they're doing it all wrong!