Homos

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
JTA
Commander
Posts: 3898
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:04 pm

Re: Homos

Unread post by JTA »

Yooo guys! I think we can conclude that an impasse has been reached in the Hummus thread. Mr. B isn't going to change his mind to be accepting of gay marriage anymore than Vrede is going to change his mind to be against it. My seasoned experience with internet arguments has taught me that once this point in an argument has been reached, there is no where else to go except for insults. I don't agree with Mr. B personally, but as long as he's not out roaming the streets in search of gay people to beat up then I guess there is no harm done here. Case closed.
Spoiler:
Image
You aren't doing it wrong if no one knows what you are doing.

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5656
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Homos

Unread post by bannination »

JTA wrote:Yooo guys! I think we can conclude that an impasse has been reached in the Hummus thread. Mr. B isn't going to change his mind to be accepting of gay marriage anymore than Vrede is going to change his mind to be against it. My seasoned experience with internet arguments has taught me that once this point in an argument has been reached, there is no where else to go except for insults. I don't agree with Mr. B personally, but as long as he's not out roaming the streets in search of gay people to beat up then I guess there is no harm done here. Case closed.
Spoiler:
Image
I agree.

I know Mr. B isn't going to change his mind about gays, but it would be great if he would admit it's not for biblical reasons, it's personal. When you point out obvious stuff on the very next line of a text that he doesn't follow nor give a crap about it's so contradictory it's maddening.

At least no one has Godwin'd yet.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: Homos

Unread post by Mr.B »

bannination wrote:"I know Mr. B isn't going to change his mind about gays, but it would be great if he would admit it's not for biblical reasons, it's personal."
Where in the world did you get that idea? :shock: I have, nor had, any reason to have personal vendettas against "gays", nor am I going to change my mind that homosexuality is a perverse, unnatural act. I've said before that I felt that way long before I ever darkened the door of a church building. My accepting Christ only strengthened my convictions.

In my working career, I've worked with several lesbians and homosexuals (and atheists); some became friends even with their awareness that I disapproved of their lifestyle; I didn't ridicule them, nor did any ridicule me for my beliefs and/or opinions.

I do not intend to shrivel up and 'conform' to this world just because it's 'popular', regardless of the outcome. (a.k.a. "tick-tock" in Vrede language) I'm not so stupid I can't see the handwriting on the wall; then again, I do see Biblical prophecy being realized....slowly, but surely.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23651
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: Homos

Unread post by O Really »

"... homosexuality is a perverse, unnatural act. I've said before that I felt that way long before I ever darkened the door of a church building." So sayeth Mr.B.

I think he just acknowledged it's personal - just like my irrational belief that rednecks are unnatural and some are perverts. Only difference is that I admit mine - I know some think it's stupid; I know not everything I believe about rednecks is true; nevertheless, that's what I believe and I'm sticking with it. I don't try to make somebody else's writings support my prejudice.

Real question: why do people who don't like/approve of gays talk about "life style." Why not just admit that for the vast majority of homosexual people, the only thing different in their life style and the rest of us is their sex life. And that's not as different as one might think.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23651
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: Homos

Unread post by O Really »

I think the person whose name shall not be spoken but whose initial is B should join in and express her own views and defend her own self as she sees fit. :)

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12708
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: Homos

Unread post by neoplacebo »

All this talk about orifices is making me hungry and wanting to go to the bathroom.

User avatar
indago
Pilot Officer
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:39 pm

Re: Homos

Unread post by indago »

ButtHurt Vrede has cacaphoniously cackled: "That's a quote of mine from only one of the 5 examples we've been discussing. My, you sure get confused easily. Run away from by indago is the rest of my post... (and other and sundry aberrations, ramifications, fixations, lamentations, hallucinations, and incantations)"

Oh, stop your Whining'nSniveling, Whiney Snively Cretin. It's a quote from the posting where you said I was a liar.

posting 1

posting 2

I called you out on it, that you point out where I had lied, and you began with your hallucinatory ranting in an attempt to run away from your most outrageous proclamation. You just couldn't point out where I had lied. If you coulda, you woulda. Now, man up and admit it, and move on. Life goes on. But, instead, I can guarantee that you will continue to Whine'nSnivel over it.

User avatar
indago
Pilot Officer
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:39 pm

Re: Homos

Unread post by indago »

ButtHurt Vrede has witlessly WIMPered: "Run away from by indago is the rest of my post:"

No I didn't: it was all included in the "and other and sundry aberrations, ramifications, fixations, lamentations, hallucinations, and incantations".

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5656
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Homos

Unread post by bannination »

O Really wrote:"... homosexuality is a perverse, unnatural act. I've said before that I felt that way long before I ever darkened the door of a church building." So sayeth Mr.B.

I think he just acknowledged it's personal - just like my irrational belief that rednecks are unnatural and some are perverts. Only difference is that I admit mine - I know some think it's stupid; I know not everything I believe about rednecks is true; nevertheless, that's what I believe and I'm sticking with it. I don't try to make somebody else's writings support my prejudice.

Real question: why do people who don't like/approve of gays talk about "life style." Why not just admit that for the vast majority of homosexual people, the only thing different in their life style and the rest of us is their sex life. And that's not as different as one might think.

Yeah, he sort of admitted it, and contradicted it at the same time. :crazy:

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5656
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Homos

Unread post by bannination »

Mr.B wrote: I'm not so stupid I can't see the handwriting on the wall; then again, I do see Biblical prophecy being realized....slowly, but surely.

Like what? Be specific, you've got my attention.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: Homos

Unread post by Mr.B »

bannination wrote: "Like what? Be specific, you've got my attention."
Revelation 21:6-8

6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end.
I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.

7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.

8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars,
shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12708
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: Homos

Unread post by neoplacebo »

Mr.B wrote:
bannination wrote: "Like what? Be specific, you've got my attention."
Revelation 21:6-8

6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end.
I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.

7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.

8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars,
shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
Number 6 reminds me of the Hindu god Krishna: "Now I have become death, the destroyer of worlds." I wonder which god is right? And number 8 just has to exist in order to affirm the belief in "life after death" so one can be killed twice. I guess there's no "life after death" after being killed a second time. There's just nothing like all that Revelation stuff.....certain death and utter doom, thrown into a lake of fire to die again. Cute.
Last edited by neoplacebo on Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5656
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: Homos

Unread post by bannination »

Mr.B wrote:
bannination wrote: "Like what? Be specific, you've got my attention."
Revelation 21:6-8

6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end.
I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.

7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.

8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars,
shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
So... what's the prediction that's being fulfilled here?

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: Homos

Unread post by rstrong »

Mr.B wrote: Revelation 21:6-8

6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end.
I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
Revelation 14:3-4

3 And they sang a new song before the throne and before the four living creatures and the elders. No one could learn the song except the 144,000 who had been redeemed from the earth. 4 These are those who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins.

Not only are women not in on the thousand year reign of Jesus but those that were "defiled by women" are out of luck. In short, if you are not both male and a virgin then you won't be one of the 144,000 saved from the tribulations.

Being married, presumably you won't be saved no matter how perfect a self-righteous bigot you are.

Or are you cherry-picking only a few convenient verses from Revelations and pretending that the rest doesn't exist, like you do with other books of the New Testament?

User avatar
indago
Pilot Officer
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:39 pm

Re: Homos

Unread post by indago »

And didn't I just get through saying: "I can guarantee that you will continue to Whine'nSnivel over it." And there you are, Whining'nSniveling, AGAIN.

ButtHurt Vrede has haranguingly hallucinated: "This is all really funny. indago chose as an example to fail at making a point one his stupidest forays here - the inability to comprehend his own article..."

It's not my article. As is plainly noted: "Journalist Terry Shropshire wrote for The Atlanta Daily World". I just noted a piece from the article to make a point.

ButtHurt Vrede has cacaphoniously cackled: "I've already posted the link to your lie and my response to it".

Well, ButtHurt, instead of hiding behind a volley of babblings, and a nebulous "link", post the lie that I wrote, right

HERE:

User avatar
indago
Pilot Officer
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:39 pm

Re: Homos

Unread post by indago »

ButtHurt Vrede, hiding behind another "volley of babblings", posted, as the lie that I wrote:

Vrede wrote:
indago wrote:
Journalist Terry Shropshire wrote for The Atlanta Daily World 3 October 2014:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The couple said it’s not about race...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As all can plainly see, I did not write that: the journalist did, and it is not inaccurate, nor is it a lie, as you have so blatantly bleated.

-------------------------------------------
Vrede wrote:
indago wrote:
The Affiant is GAY. Her family disapproves of her lesbianism. She is suing to, among other things, obtain enough money to move to a more accepting environment for her and her daughter. There is no amount of babblonious blustering on your part that will change these facts. In other words: You are pissing into the wind.

Sigh, the article says, "that family members have no use for 2-year-old Payton," not, "disapproves of her lesbianism," though that may be the case.

Your other article says, "The couple had actually relocated from Akron to the less-racially diverse town of Uniontown because there would be better schools, but now those schools might present a bigger challenge for Payton’s academic and psychological well-being." Guess what, they were lesbians when they moved there.

There is nothing in either article that says that they want to "move to a more accepting environment for her (the mother)".

There is nothing in either article that says her disapproving family is in Uniontown or even in Ohio.

You're digging your hole deeper.
-------------------------------------------

"We are asking they change policy so it never happens again," Misny said. The lawsuit also seeks "compensation to receive the kind of counseling they will need going forward, and also to relocate to an area that is more demographically in tune with their family," he said. "At times she (Cramblett) feels that she is underwater. She loves her child to death. But what she needs is assistance in handling it properly," Misny said.

CNN

There is nothing in what I wrote that is inaccurate, nor is it a lie, as you have so blatantly bleated. You post a lot of meaningless drivel in a feeble attempt to "cover your ass". Not buying it.

User avatar
indago
Pilot Officer
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:39 pm

Re: Homos

Unread post by indago »

ButtHurt Vrede has childishly chided: "Run away, indago, run away."

Oh, did you post something of value somewhere? Point it out and I'll have a look at it.

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: Homos

Unread post by rstrong »

Image

User avatar
indago
Pilot Officer
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:39 pm

Re: Homos

Unread post by indago »

ButtHurt Vrede has boorishly babbled: "I'll allow for the possibility that indago really is that illiterate... (and other and sundry aberrations, ramifications, fixations, lamentations, hallucinations, and incantations)"

Image

OK, now reach up and pull the dirt on top of you...

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23651
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: Homos

Unread post by O Really »

OK, now I understand why Mr.B et.al. are hung up on the "gay lifestyle." Here's an outrageous example in the A-CT. Imagine - two middle-age guys, a hotel services manager and an accountant! Accountant? Seriously? How awful a lifestyle is that? Remodeled a house in Montford - it's enough to make anyone barf. And a Christmas tree! Ewwwwww! Those with such "lifestyles" should definitely be discriminated against.

http://www.citizen-times.com/story/life ... /19962123/

Post Reply