Censoring is Ridiculous on Blueridgenow

[Colonel Taylor]

OK is someone complaining about all these post or is he just being the WORLDS biggest DICK, gee can I say that here or NOT.

You have been banned from this board until Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:36 pm.

Please contact the Board Administrator for more information.

Reason given for ban: ....Damned liberal try having a thought of your own just once.

Not that I approve, Det.Thorn, but it's your karma for all the indirect calls to get me re-banned even if you didn't report me. WGACA.

I don't think anyone is bothering with reporting these days. No need with the WORLD'S biggest DICK running things. See the page 1 instructions for how to keep posting.

Yeah just not worth it right now maybe a little later. I have never reported anyone. If he keeps banning everyone who will be left?

[Sometime Lefty]

Damn twist, you're fun to laugh at. Please keep posting stupid stuff.

[Bungalow Buill]

I see where the censors are having some problems going through all the posts since
8/22/12. I commiserate with them on the time problem. Might I suggest that there
are probably some ex-memebers of the Stasi who would probably like some part-time
work, and would be quite good as this type of work. Just a suggestion.

[k9nanny]

The following is a warning which has been issued to you by an administrator or moderator of this site.
R.j. roberts was warned about language for the first time. The post you quoted was left intact because it is linked in the warning and I have not received confirmation of the warning being read. Again, I am aware of what is being posted and by whom. Please do not repost/quote again!

"Warned about language for the first time."
Gee- was mini me's post left intact until confirmation was received? Hee hee.

Question. Suppose we open the PM page, but not the warning. As long as the mod's message remains in his outbox, do our offending posts remain?

[Bungalow Bill]

These folks are so transparent it's pathetic. r.j. roberts has crap, chit, chithole, and assinine in there,
some more than once, and they can't figure it out with all their double talk. It's been up there since
early Wednesday. I don't care, but they're the ones who are trying to establish a "civil discourse."
They're just a joke.

[Wneglia]

There may be no censorship, but there is defacto inhibition of freedom of speech.

Tried to send a PM and got this: "We are sorry, but you are not authorised to use this feature. You may have just registered here and may need to participate more to be able to use this feature."

[bannination]

There may be no censorship, but there is defacto inhibition of freedom of speech.

Tried to send a PM and got this: "We are sorry, but you are not authorised to use this feature. You may have just registered here and may need to participate more to be able to use this feature."

Sorry about that, I believe it requires that a person post at least 3 times before they're given permission to PM. It's spam prevention feature. I'll see if I can't turn that off.

Edit: Done

[DooHickey]

I need to plant this post from "'Cranks and crazies' in the GOP" here in case I need it for future reference.

My post concerning my wishing the elections were over with got deleted, possibly because of what I called used cattle food.

Moderator, are you really THAT persnickety? You wouldn't by chance be that preacher Billy Bob Somebody from down in Georgia who came here a couple of years ago to teach Hendersonville a lesson about banning street preaching are you? If you aren't, you're missing a good chance, because you're slinging hellfire and brimstone to every corner of the forum. Don't you think you're carrying this warning and censoring thingy a bit too far?

I know------- I'll probably get a "WARNING" or even sent to the corner for a couple of weeks, 'cause I was a bad, bad, kid.

[\V/]

That's the most ridiculous thing about the mod claiming actions are an attempt to establish a "civil discourse."...by mangling the forums from the very day they started!!!
They're butt-hurt because it was obviously apparent to most members as the level of the mod's incompetence :!:
The mod has pointed out, publicly...that no matter how irrelevant their reason...they will exert their overly assumed self importance, over the content posted in the forums
Fucking shit-stain forgot...they can't "establish" something that they themselves lack

[Wneglia]

There may be no censorship, but there is defacto inhibition of freedom of speech.

Tried to send a PM and got this: "We are sorry, but you are not authorised to use this feature. You may have just registered here and may need to participate more to be able to use this feature."

Sorry about that, I believe it requires that a person post at least 3 times before they're given permission to PM. It's spam prevention feature. I'll see if I can't turn that off.

Edit: Done

Thanks for tr.ying, but still no go

[Wneglia]

sorry, Banni, still can't do PM's.

[bannination]

sorry, Banni, still can't do PM's.

Fixed, I don't know how that got flubbed.

[Wneglia]

sorry, Banni, still can't do PM's.

Fixed, I don't know how that got flubbed.

It's workingfine now. Thanks.

[k9nanny]

That took less than 90 seconds.

You have been banned from this board until Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:35 am.

Please contact the Board Administrator for more information.

Reason given for ban: Ignored repeated warnings of unacceptable behavior.

A ban has been issued on your username.


Up yours, pantywaist moderator. Can't take a bit of truth, can we?
DooHickey started the thread.
Others poked fun.

Meanwhile, Foolgle baits and goes *off-topic*with every thread he starts,
and r.j.roberts' post remains intact.

Back when I wrote for the Times-News, I used to be on the receiving end of letters to the editor that would make a hooker blush. The old guard would be shocked by this priggishness.

Karma is a bitch.

[bannination]

That took less than 90 seconds.

You have been banned from this board until Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:35 am.

Please contact the Board Administrator for more information.

Reason given for ban: Ignored repeated warnings of unacceptable behavior.

A ban has been issued on your username.


Up yours, pantywaist moderator. Can't take a bit of truth, can we?
DooHickey started the thread.
Others poked fun.

Meanwhile, Foolgle baits and goes *off-topic*with every thread he starts,
and r.j.roberts' post remains intact.

Back when I wrote for the Times-News, I used to be on the receiving end of letters to the editor that would make a hooker blush. The old guard would be shocked by this priggishness.

Karma is a bitch.

What did you write that was ban worthy? I missed it, and they censored the post.

I believe this is the thread being referred to.

[k9nanny]

I posted it on a new thread - BAITING.
It's the first time I've received a warning that includes a quote instead of a link.

Question is, why is the thread still there?

Baiting
Sent: Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:03 am
From: BRNModerator
To: k9nanny

Posts such as the following are considered as "baiting" or "trolling" and are a violation of forum rules.

We ain't right?
I got paddled for reposting rj's rant, peppered with Implied profanity. Seems you have to confirm receipt of your warning before the post is removed. Ha! Other posts disappear within minutes.

Everyday phrases like "Karma is a female dog" are now considered to be profane.

Shoot- even Det.Thorn got his legs striped for writing ..[a structure that holds water back] liberal try having a thought of your own just once.

We ain't the ones that ain't right!
IMO, the nastiness spewed by certain posters is more offensive than a couple of words allowed on just about any TV show.

[bannination]

Oh ok, my bad, that was the post. I'm slow today...

Edit: Err.. on second thought maybe I'm not, because I can't figure out why the heck that was ban worthy. What a stupid mod.

[DooHickey]

That was me that wrote "Well, water retaining device it all". Duh---the post was deleted as baitng.

[k9nanny]

That was me that wrote "Well, water retaining device it all". Duh---the post was deleted as baitng.

Det.Thorn and I also used it. Guess it falls under the category of implied profanity.
What a twit, the moderator, I mean.

[\V/]

That was me that wrote "Well, water retaining device it all". Duh---the post was deleted as baitng.

Baiting!?!? That's it...it's official the mod is an incompetent boob Fucking idiot could delete every post that is made, under that determination...since the moron is reviewing every post...what an idiot