"Paul said that slaves were to be treated "as brothers", whether they were or not, we don't know."
O Really wrote:"I don't see the "twisting" Mr.B."
Read the above underlined very carefully....Did I say slaves ARE (or WERE) treated as brothers? Are your words not a twist of what I actually said?rstrong wrote:"You don't think that slavery is a sin. You even justify it with "but slaves are treated as brothers!" "
Mr.B wrote:"I never said I supported or condoned slavery; I too KNOW it's absurd, degrading, and downright vile."
rstrong wrote:"Or to be more accurate ( :?: ) you condoned it, justified it with your claim that slave owners treated slaves "like brothers", doubled down on the claim at least twice, and now you're finally back-peddling".
Show me where any of my words "condoned or justified" slavery.bannination wrote:"Also, how you think slavery is in any way moral."
You conveniently left off the rest: ""Speaking", as Paul wrote, is preaching. Churches that view the Bible as God's Word do not allow women to preach. Inasmuch as God ordained and blessed the union of a man and woman as husband and wife, the man is to have authority over his household and the church. Women are allowed to speak, i.e. teach in church, just as the wife is allowed to speak and make decisions at home"(Kinda hard to preach if you don't open your mouth to speak, huh?!!)rstrong---(quoting Mr.B) wrote: "Women are allowed to speak, i.e. teach in church, just as the wife is allowed to speak and make decisions at home."
"Not according to your designated authority on morality."
That's what I mean when I say "twisting".....enough of this foolishness.