The homophobic thread :>

[Mr.B]

"Mr.B lies again - the infantile, obsessive posts about the sex that gays have are all his.

I do post about other oppressed groups, dummy.

Repeated advocacy for discrimination is hate, pure hate, just like the slavers and KKK had. Stop lying to us and yourself.

Again, fool, the "religious beliefs" I detest are your cherry picked justifications for bigotry and hateful discrimination in law and policy, not all Christianity. Are you really so dishonest or just that stupid?"

My, my, my......getting testy, aren't we?

It appears "your eyes are turning brown" (to quote the late Michael Fain)
Before you board your flight, pop a couple of ExLax, and by the time you get home, maybe, just maybe, all that build-up will be ready to purge and you will be all refreshed to start over. Good luck with it. (you might want to stra p on a Depends just in case your flight is delayed)

(haha...the censor wouldn't let me type the word stra p.....)

[Mr.B]

"Another infantile diversion from Mr.B's lies, ignorance, pure hate, religious cherry picking and stupidity - now to his new obsession with poop."

When did you change your name? I'm not obsessed with you; just lending medical advice which you're too stupid to recognize.
(was that an "infantile diversion" from your name calling?)

[Mr.B]

"Don't be such a crybaby. You lie about my posts and your own while obsessing about poop, you get called the names that you've earned. "

I wouldn't have expected any less from you. You're great at proving my points, and you're a liar and a twister as well; you get called the names that you've earned; don't be such a crybaby.

[Mr.B]

"Quote and link one supposed lie or twist of mine. Good luck and don't run away again. This should be entertaining."

I don't have all day. Your lies and twists are found in practically everything you post....lets see...."your advocacy.. your obsession .. your lies, etc....

[Mr.B]

"I knew that you couldn't find one, liar. I've cited specific examples each time of your advocacy of discrimination, your obsessions with gay-sex and poop, and your lies about your posts and mine. You deny, divert and run away, Forum Victim."

As well as you deny, divert, twist, and resort to name-calling.

[Mr.B]

Censor note: (You can't put 'gay' and 'sex' after each other...they have to be separated.....to bad humans can't figure that out)

"So, Mr.B - I can understand why you would object to being characterized as being "obsessed with gay-sex," but isn't it true that when you use the term "gay lifestyle" that you're referring to their sex life?"

Why else would two of the same gender join together? True, there are many who can't perform sexually, but that can be found in heterosexuals unions as well.

When two men or two women are shown together caressing and swapping slobbers, that is homosexuality regardless whether or not a sexual union takes place. "Gay" sex doesn't always involve the actual union.

It was Vrede who, in his/her infinite all-knowing wisdom of homosexual behavior, labeled me as "gay-sex obsessed" merely because I stated that sex between two of the same gender is perverse. Also, when I said he/she needed an ExLax, I was accused of being "poop-obsessed". One weird character.

"If you didn't know a co-worker was gay, would you be able to find things about their "lifestyle" you objected to? I doubt you object to them getting an education, becoming accountants, business people, electronic techs, whatever. I doubt you object to them going to movies, hiking, biking, taking vacations at the beach. So what part of their "lifestyle" other than gay-sex do you object to? "

<sigh> Do I have to explain this again?

Let me do some "cherry-picking" for you:

◄ Leviticus 18:22 ►
Parallel Verses:

New International Version:
"'Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.

New Living Translation:
"Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin.

English Standard Version:
You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.

New American Standard Bible:
'You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.

King James Bible:
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

Holman Christian Standard Bible:
You are not to sleep with a man as with a woman; it is detestable.

International Standard Version:
You are not to have sexual relations with a male as you would with a woman. It's detestable."

NET Bible:
You must not have sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman; it is a detestable act.

GOD'S WORD® Translation:
Never have sexual intercourse with a man as with a woman. It is disgusting.

Jubilee Bible 2000:
Thou shalt not lie with males as with women; it is abomination.

King James 2000 Bible:
You shall not lie with a man, as with a woman: it is abomination.

American King James Version:
You shall not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

American Standard Version:
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

Douay-Rheims Bible:
Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind, because it is an abomination.

Darby Bible Translation:
And thou shalt not lie with mankind as one lieth with a woman: it is an abomination.

English Revised Version:
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

Webster's Bible Translation:
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

World English Bible:
You shall not lie with a man, as with a woman. That is detestable.

Young's Literal Translation:
And with a male thou dost not lie as one lieth with a woman; abomination it is.

[Mr.B]

"One weird character."

"Could be, but not so weird as to be obsessed with gay-sex and poop."

Also has a one-track mind.

[Mr.B]

"If you stop posting your obsessions with gay-sex and poop I'll have no opportunities to ridicule them. This is not rocket surgery."

"Rocket surgery"?

"I probably would not be calling Mr.B "obsessed with the sex that gays have" if "gay-lifestyle" was all he posted. In fact, he's way, way more explicit than that. Just like homerfobe and Westboro Baptist, but not as colorfully descriptive."

In what way am I "way, way more explicit"? I've posted nothing remotely close to hf or WB. Hallucinate much?

[Mr.B]

That pathetic lie again, Mr.B? Why do you keep humiliating yourself this way? Here's just some of you posts about gaysex:

...Sigh, again, Mr.B's obsession with the sex that gays have, more than anyone else here besides homerfobe:

...copulate with one another...un-natural relationship with one of the same sex...'gay' sex is an unnatural act, and I'll say it again...'gay' sex is an unnatural act. A male was not designed to copulate with another male; nor was a female...the sex act between two of the same gender...'gay' sex is an unnatural act, and I'll say it again...'gay' sex is an unnatural act"...what they are doing is unnatural and perverted...perversion...perversion...perversion...I've always said that the homosexual act is un-natural. Man was not designed to have sex with another man, nor was the male body intended to be used as another male's sexual partner; same goes for the females......

There's been more since, it's adorable that he keeps denying his own posts and pathetic that he thinks anyone buys his denials.

You are obsessed with the physical acts that gays engage in, there's not been any other subject that you've posted more about over the past few months, not one, and it's been proven over and over. Why are you such a wuss about admitting it and how you could you possibly be so foolish as to think anyone reading this forum and seeing your quotes believes it?

I'm not even going to bother quoting all the subsequent months of descriptors.

You call that "explicit"? I know you don't live that much of a sheltered life...! again, I've posted nothing remotely close to hf or WB.

[O Really]

Censor note: (You can't put 'gay' and 'sex' after each other...they have to be separated.....to bad humans can't figure that out)

"So, Mr.B - I can understand why you would object to being characterized as being "obsessed with gay-sex," but isn't it true that when you use the term "gay lifestyle" that you're referring to their sex life?"

Why else would two of the same gender join together? True, there are many who can't perform sexually, but that can be found in heterosexuals unions as well.

When two men or two women are shown together caressing and swapping slobbers, that is homosexuality regardless whether or not a sexual union takes place. "Gay" sex doesn't always involve the actual union.

It was Vrede who, in his/her infinite all-knowing wisdom of homosexual behavior, labeled me as "gay-sex obsessed" merely because I stated that sex between two of the same gender is perverse. Also, when I said he/she needed an ExLax, I was accused of being "poop-obsessed". One weird character.

"If you didn't know a co-worker was gay, would you be able to find things about their "lifestyle" you objected to? I doubt you object to them getting an education, becoming accountants, business people, electronic techs, whatever. I doubt you object to them going to movies, hiking, biking, taking vacations at the beach. So what part of their "lifestyle" other than gay-sex do you object to? "

<sigh> Do I have to explain this again?

Let me do some "cherry-picking" for you:

◄ Leviticus 18:22 ►
Parallel Verses:
(list of quotes...)

.

I dunno, Mr.B. That list sounds pretty much all about sex to me. Now moving on, what part of the "gay lifestyle" other than sex to you object to?

[rstrong]

If you stop posting your obsessions with gay-sex and poop I'll have no opportunities to ridicule them.

To be honest, while Mr.B's bigotry is often showing, I don't get the impression that he has any such obsession. Not even a more subtle version of homerfobe's obsession.

Sorry to be a party pooper.

[Mr.B]

"To be honest, while Mr.B's bigotry is often showing, I don't get the impression that he has any such obsession. Not even a more subtle version of homerfobe's obsession....Sorry to be a party pooper."

Uhhh..thanks :?: That was a shockeroo coming from you!

"We disagree."

That too, is a shockeroo...I can't ever recall your saying you "disagree" with someone.
Usually it's something like "false witness", or just outright 'liar'.


(Y'all 'cuse me...I'm going to check my temperature; it must be so high I'm hallucinating!)

[Mr.B]

"Do you know that the forum has a search feature?"

No!?! ....You're kidding, right?!?!

[Mr.B]

"Sarcasm understood, guess I have to chalk it up to laziness or dishonesty then. Thanks for clearing it up."

"dishonesty"....another word from your vast vocabulary of selected adjectives.

[bannination]

Censor note: (You can't put 'gay' and 'sex' after each other...they have to be separated.....to bad humans can't figure that out)

It's all about the spam bots though. The hosting provider has found that those words are usually used in spam in that combination. I've remarked how close the discussion of politics and religion are to spam.
TLDR; It's spam prevention not censoring.

[Mr.B]

"It's spam prevention not censoring."

So how does "gay-sex" correlate with spam? :-0?>

[O Really]

"It's spam prevention not censoring."

So how does "gay-sex" correlate with spam? :-0?>

Banni explained that. The spam detector has found that g a y sex is found in a large percentage of spam messages. Like "grow big p e n i s". Or "money from Nigeria" whatever. So when that term is seen, it is deleted as "likely spam" but is not deleted because it might offend someone.

[Mr.B]

Oh.

[bannination]

Michele Bachmann: Gays Want To Let Adults 'Freely Prey On Little Children Sexually'


Hm... Michele Bachmann.... Mr. B......... could they be the same?

[Mr.B]

"I'm not sure that Chick-Fil-A customers are that smart..."

How Chick-fil-A Hires: The Christian Way

The chicken chain’s hiring practice is long and controversial; but it’s hard to argue with results. Credit: J. Reed

There are a few things you need to become a franchisee operator of a Chick-fil-A.

A commitment to the company. A strong belief in “wholesome values”. A willingness to endure a year-long vetting process. And it helps if you are married.

What don’t you need? A lot of money.

Chick-fil-A is, store-for-store, the most successful fast food restaurant in America, despite all of its locations being closed once a week (Sundays).
And yet, to become a franchise operator, a person only needs $5,000, compared to the $1.9 million it takes to open a KFC.

Rather than looking for operators with cash, S. Truett Cathy – the company’s founder – has always focused on finding people committed to the company’s mission statement. And what is that?

“To glorify God by being a faithful steward of all that is entrusted to us,” it reads. “To have a positive influence on all who come in contact with Chick-fil-A.”

The Hiring Process

Chick-fil-A gets between 10,000 to 25,000 applicants a year from aspiring franchise operators to fill the 60 to 70 open slots that open up each year, according to http://www.ajc.com. As part of the application, Chick-fil-A asks candidates to disclose their marital status, number of dependents and their involvement in community, civil and religious organizations, according to southernstudies.com.

The company’s vetting process can include more than a dozen interviews with an applicant – some lasting hours – and the applicant’s family, including with their children, according to Forbes.Cathy told the magazine he is looking for married candidates (he believes they are more industrious) who are loyal, wholesome and treat their families well.

“If a man can’t manage his own life, he can’t manage a business,” Cathy said, according to Forbes.

Chick-fil-A’s hiring practices have been met with opposition, as the company has been sued at least 12 times on charges of employment discrimination, according to Forbes. And yet that has done little to stop the company from becoming the most successful fast food restaurant in America on a per-store basis.

The average Chick-fil-A store produced $2.7 million in revenue in 2010, which was $300,000 more than second-place McDonald’s, according to http://www.ajc.com. And turnover at Chick-fil-A stores for both franchise operators and hourly workers are both far below industry averages, according to Forbes.

One quick note, unlike many fast food chains, Chick-fil-A owns all of its stores and has franchise operators instead of owners. The setup seems to be mutually beneficial, as the average Chick-fil-A franchise operator makes $190,000 a year, more than most franchise owners, according towww.ajc.com.

The Bottom Line

Chick-fil-A’s hiring process is like Zappos in same ways: it has a very clear culture and makes cultural fit a top priority. The results are hard to argue with, as the company is one of the most successful restaurant chains in America, despite Forbes reporting that its closed-on-Sunday edict costs the company $500 million a year.

Saying that, there are many critics to the restaurant’s hiring practices and it seems to be a lawsuit-magnet. And by looking for a certain profile, the company is potentially excluding great candidates.

Ultimately though, what makes the company successful is its top-down commitment to one, clear vision, whether you agree with it or not. And that is epitomized in its hiring practice.