The homophobic thread :>

[JTA]

Gay Marriage Gets the Green Light in West Virginia

Oh man... if you guys lost West Virginia, this fight is over.

Next thing you know people in West Virginia will be trying to marry their brothers and sisters.

[JTA]

If I ever renew my vows it's good to know I now have the choice of having a gay wedding instead of a plain old straight one.

[JTA]

So does your wife.

It's my right as an American and as a straight male to marry my straight wife in gay matrimony. Gays were never barred from straight marriages, just gay ones. Now that gay people are allowed gay marriages, straights should be allowed to have gay marriages as well. That's the way God and George Washington would have intended it, this being America and all.

[JTA]

There are plenty of effeminate males and butch women that are not gay.



Not sure which category that image would fall under.

[indago]

It's sad the disgusting perverted immorality that so many have them have now sunk to.

Yes, can you imagine the "disgusting perverted immorality" of "takin' it in the ass"?

[Mr.B]

"It's a hoot that I now join SCOTUS, 4 Appeals Courts, over 20 federal judges and bunches of state judges in that gay porn movie playing in your head. What am I wearing? Is it something pretty? "

"I dunno...tell me his name and give me a description; then I can make a judgment."

"Ummm, the post is about me, who you've met, and how would I know what you've got me wearing in that gay porn movie playing in your head? Damn, you're illiterate."

And you ain't as smart as you think you are. You went back and edited your post....your original question was "What is he wearing?"; "Is he pretty?" hence my reply to give me a description.


You missed this line further down in the exchange:

Vrede: "......... Ah-ha, you are speculating about it. Just as I've been saying, and many scientific studies have said. Is he pretty?"
Mr.B: "See reply above".

[Mr.B]

"Damn, you're stupid. The early exchange was about your speculation that I am gay. The later exchange was about your speculating about the type of gay lover you would choose. I'd suggest that you look back and admit that you screwed up, but we know how you are."

Damn, you're more stupid than I imagined...
I did go back and look, dummy. When you quoted our first exchange, something didn't look right, so I went back to look at the original post.

You realized you "screwed up" when you asked me if he (whoever you were referring to) was pretty; then you went back and edited your original post.

I replied: "I dunno...tell me his name and give me a description; then I can make a judgment."

Now, I might be crazy, but I ain't stupid; why do you think I would ask such a question if you had written "What am I wearing? Is it something pretty?" What would a name and a description have to do with what you're wearing or if it is pretty?

'fess up, man up or whatever....you haven't said you didn't edit it, you did do a dance around it ....'nuther words...you lie; we know how you are.

[indago]

There was a time Mr.B and I and perhaps you can personally remember when Christians led the struggle against bigotry like his. It's sad the disgusting perverted immorality that so many have them have now sunk to.

Yes, can you imagine the "disgusting perverted immorality" of "takin' it in the ass"?

You're clearly picturing it, vividly. Hmmm.

I don't post about gay sex at all and neither do any of the other tolerant folks here. It's just you and Mr.B that have gay porn movies playing in your head.

Oh, I see: perverts just want to get married together just because. And John Wayne Gacy was just a local contractor who played a clown for the children at local events. And Andrei Chikatilo was just a lonely guy who was henpecked by his wife, and boss. And Adolph Hitler was just a governor, bent on helping his fellow countrymen into a better life.

[indago]

Gays want to get married for the same multiple reasons that straights do. As was discussed at length when Mr.B brought up the same gay sex-obsessed (hmmm) foolishness, almost no one these days has to get married for sex.

What we do know from proven science, as opposed to indago's cultural ignorance, is that the most homophobic, like indago, are most likely to have latent homoerotic tendencies.

Well, contrary to your fantasies about me, I just don't feel, or exhibit, any "latent homoerotic tendencies".

So, you'll just have to look elsewhere for your "Fun'nGames"...

[Mr.B]

"I did not go back and edit anything, I'm not a liar like you."
You just lied again....(Oh, like me of course! )

"You invent some deceptive....."
I've got the best instructor that can be found anywhere.......

[Mr.B]

"Denial and overcompensation is a consistent element of the pathology."

You would know. :gayhappy:

[indago]

Denial and overcompensation is a consistent element of the pathology.

You ducked the first paragraph of my post, how stupid your linking of marriage with the need to get sex is these days, wuss.

I wish you would stop coming on to me here. I'm just not of your ilk.

[Mr.B]

"What we do know from proven science, as opposed to indago's cultural ignorance, is that the most homophobic, like indago, are most likely to have latent homoerotic tendencies."

"Your defensiveness is very revealing, Mr.B and indago. A homophobe that wasn't concerned about the applicability to her or himself would be able to admit the proven science rather than grasp at the delusion that it isn't proven science."

Typical liberal comebacks when their love for perversion is challenged:
"Well, science has proven that if you don't like homosexuals, you are a secret homosexual"
(I sure there's numerous "gay scientists" that came up with that earth-shattering bit of intelligent thinking)
"If you don't like "gays", you must be "gay".
"You don't like "gays"? You must fantasize about them!"
"Because I support homosexuality, you're obsessed with me"
"Because you think I might be "gay", you're fantasizing about me"
...and the whines go on, and on, and on, and on,.....

[Mr.B]

Vatican proposes 'stunning' shift on gays, lesbians

A cardinal in the Philippines!?! The world's largest cesspool of depravity!

Gotta find some way to keep those $$$$ coming in......those huge, cavernous cathedrals ain't cheap to maintain, you know.
Photos

[Mr.B]

"...your profile says you're the Captain, so I guess that means you out rank (sic) everyone else...my bad."

"It goes up and down, banni is a harsh and arbitrary CiC. Plus, I think "Marshal" JTA outranks me."

Colonel Taylor has you all beaten....he was a general when he left; must be president for life by now!
(now that I think of it, does a president out-rank our forums Dear Leader?) :-0?>

[Mr.B]

"The SCOTUS has no business in deciding a faggot-marriage issue."

"On rights issues, it is indeed the business of SCOTUS. Not the voters."

"Rights are not something you put up for a vote. America has a Bill of Rights, not a Bill of Popular Opinions."

Nor is it called 'The Bill of Privileges'.

[Mr.B]

The Nine Senate Democrats Who Still Don't Support Gay Marriage

Democratic Sens. Kay Hagan of North Carolina, Jon Tester of Montana, Mark Warner of Virginia and Claire McCaskill of Missouri all came out in favor of gay marriage this week, the latest in a seeming avalanche of support for the social issue of the moment...Here are the nine holdouts, along with how far out each is from his or her next election...

Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania. Up for reelection in 2018.
Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia. Up for reelection in 2018.
Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida. Up for reelection in 2018.
Sen. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota. Up for reelection in 2018.
Sen. Tom Carper of Delaware. Up for reelection in 2018.
Sen. Joe Donnelly of Indiana. Up for reelection in 2018.
Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana. Up for reelection in 2014.
Sen. Mark Pryor of Arkansas. Up for reelection in 2014.
Sen. Tim Johnson of South Dakota. Won't run for reelection in 2014.

...Of the four most recent conversions, Hagan and Warner face reelection next year...

...and now she's done an Obama-type turnabout......good re-election stuff.

[Mr.B]

Democratic Sens. Kay Hagan of North Carolina, Jon Tester of Montana, Mark Warner of Virginia and Claire McCaskill of Missouri all came out in favor of gay marriage this week, the latest in a seeming avalanche of support for the social issue of the moment...
...Of the four most recent conversions, Hagan and Warner face reelection next year...

Ain't it strange how the timing of changing one's mind on social issues coincides with re-election?
Example: Barack Obama

[O Really]

[
...and now she's done an Obama-type turnabout......good re-election stuff.

Why is that a bad thing? Is it unreasonable to change ones mind? Have you never done so? And if your job is dependent on getting elected, is it unreasonable to do things likely to make that happen? How stupid would one have to be to keep quixoting lost-cause windmills when it would hurt your election changes? Oh yeah, as stupid as Tillis. And isn't that a gift we appreciate like a "legitimate rape" comment?

[Mr.B]

[ "...and now she's done an Obama-type turnabout......good re-election stuff."

"Why is that a bad thing? Is it unreasonable to change ones mind? Have you never done so? And if your job is dependent on getting elected, is it unreasonable to do things likely to make that happen? How stupid would one have to be to keep quixoting lost-cause windmills when it would hurt your election changes?"

No job is so important that it would make me compromise my scruples.
I quit a job once because when I was hired, I was told I wouldn't have to work every Sunday; I was later told that I WILL work every Sunday if I wanted to keep the job. I brushed up on my Spanish with a good rendition of Adios!

As for political figures, they're all good at making asses out of themselves.