Sexiest woman ever in movies was Linda Hamilton in "Terminator 2"neoplacebo wrote: I personally like athletic women who don't wear makeup. I find them very attractive. .

Sexiest woman ever in movies was Linda Hamilton in "Terminator 2"neoplacebo wrote: I personally like athletic women who don't wear makeup. I find them very attractive. .
O Really wrote:"Mr.B finds it weird that men would dress like women, but I bet when he sees a guy wearing a kilt, he doesn't think "skirt".
I've never called a kilt a skirt; no stranger than an Indian wearing a head-dress.
"When he sees portrayals of Jesus, I bet he doesn't think either "dress" or "bathrobe."
No one knows what manner of clothing He wore; but you're right; I don't compare it to a bathrobe, dress, or sheet.
'When he sees Alice Cooper, I bet he doesn't think "like a woman" despite the mascara and lipstick."
Correct, I think plain 'ol butt-ugly weird.
"I'm beginning to think there is no room in Mr.B's world for personal variation. Any deviation from the "garden variety" and a person becomes socially unacceptable. So - Mr.B, give us your opinion on Goths, body art enthusiasts, Mardi Gras krewe members, hipsters, lumbersexuals, and gangsta rappers."
A man was created to look like and act like a man, and to be attractive to a woman. A woman was created to look like and act like a woman, and to be attractive to a man. A man should be sexually attracted to a woman; a woman should be sexually attracted to a man.
The ugliest thing I've ever seen is a woman that looks like a 3 year old kid with crayons used her body for a coloring book.
The next ugliest thing I've ever seen is a man or woman whose face looks they fell face first into a fishing tackle box.
Combine them, and you've got one mell of a hess.
Those others....I don't see enough of them to make a call.
That's what I said. But tangibly, there is no difference in a kilt and a skirt. In fact, some women's skirts are styled as a kilt. It's only in your mind that it makes a difference.Mr.B wrote:O Really wrote:"Mr.B finds it weird that men would dress like women, but I bet when he sees a guy wearing a kilt, he doesn't think "skirt".
I've never called a kilt a skirt; no stranger than an Indian wearing a head-dress.
'
Vrede wrote:"The funny thing is that Mr.B is pretty fastidious in his dress and grooming..."
I do dress in a way that no one can confuse me with being "fruity" or a female.
"gay" one might say, way more so than me, neoplacebo or even k9nanny."
And how would that be determined?
I'm surprised in your collection of stereotypes regarding homosexual males that you don't know most have a very good sense of style and dress very well, and not in a way they would be considered "fruity" or a female. And some wear lumberjack style.Mr.B wrote:Vrede wrote:"The funny thing is that Mr.B is pretty fastidious in his dress and grooming..."
I do dress in a way that no one can confuse me with being "fruity" or a female.
"gay" one might say, way more so than me, neoplacebo or even k9nanny."
And how would that be determined?
Vrede wrote:Just like sexuality itself, dress and grooming are on a spectrum, not either/or. Yours happens to be more stereotypically elderly "gay" than ours. Your obsession with appearance can be likened, for example, to O Really's lumberjack saying that you look "fruity" to him.[color=#0000FF]Mr.B[/color] wrote:Vrede wrote:The funny thing is that Mr.B is pretty fastidious in his dress and grooming
I do dress in a way that no one can confuse me with being "fruity"
Debatable, given that gays dress many different ways.
I'm certain you'd be up to date on how "gays" dress? Accusing an anti-gay of being "gay" is supposed to be a triumph for you?
or a female.
Straw man, I didn't say that.
I did...making my point.
"gay" one might say, way more so than me, neoplacebo or even k9nanny."
And how would that be determined?
Ummm, fastidiousness, as I said.
I don't expect you to get the point or admit it if you do.
I know what you mean; typical whining from you.
rstrong wrote:Don't worry; we all know that you're the most qualified gay expert here, Mr.B. You've obviously studied and pondered the issue more than anyone else.
I dunno 'bout that. According to the responses I get to my posts, there's others more highly qualified than myself.
"Cold wave?" A quick check of the weather for Raleigh shows that it's 19°F. Charlotte is 22°F. We're basking in unseasonably mild weather at -4°F right now. It'll be -26°F by Saturday night.
yep....cold wave! Right now, it's 9°F here; was 2.8°F this morning when I got up. High today was 15°F We're quite a ways from Charlotte or Raleigh; higher in elevation as well. You can have your "Alberta Clipper" back anytime you want it.
Clueless; as to what that is.Vrede wrote:"Ut-oh, Mr.B is on his church's event decorating committee. Opps."
Doesn't have committees.Vrede wrote:'Because your church doesn't have events or because it doesn't decorate for them?"
A complete idiot who managed to get elected to The Idaho House of Representatives received a female reproductive anatomy lesson today.
[...]
Barbieri sits on the board of a crisis pregnancy center in northern Idaho, and voted in favor of the legislation, because he is an ignorant dipshit. We should just put him in charge of All Of The Things.
Vrede wrote:That's how we get GOP Idaho lawmakers.
Seems like with things like artificial insemination and what not we could just do away completely with intercourse and make it a sin no matter what.Boatrocker wrote:So, that means that "traditional" vaginal sex is . . . sodomy?