War on Women

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23151
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by O Really »

neoplacebo wrote: I personally like athletic women who don't wear makeup. I find them very attractive. .
Sexiest woman ever in movies was Linda Hamilton in "Terminator 2" :-||

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by Mr.B »

O Really wrote:"Mr.B finds it weird that men would dress like women, but I bet when he sees a guy wearing a kilt, he doesn't think "skirt".
I've never called a kilt a skirt; no stranger than an Indian wearing a head-dress.

"When he sees portrayals of Jesus, I bet he doesn't think either "dress" or "bathrobe."
No one knows what manner of clothing He wore; but you're right; I don't compare it to a bathrobe, dress, or sheet.

'When he sees Alice Cooper, I bet he doesn't think "like a woman" despite the mascara and lipstick."
Correct, I think plain 'ol butt-ugly weird.

"I'm beginning to think there is no room in Mr.B's world for personal variation. Any deviation from the "garden variety" and a person becomes socially unacceptable. So - Mr.B, give us your opinion on Goths, body art enthusiasts, Mardi Gras krewe members, hipsters, lumbersexuals, and gangsta rappers."
A man was created to look like and act like a man, and to be attractive to a woman. A woman was created to look like and act like a woman, and to be attractive to a man. A man should be sexually attracted to a woman; a woman should be sexually attracted to a man.

The ugliest thing I've ever seen is a woman that looks like a 3 year old kid with crayons used her body for a coloring book.
The next ugliest thing I've ever seen is a man or woman whose face looks they fell face first into a fishing tackle box.
Combine them, and you've got one mell of a hess.
Those others....I don't see enough of them to make a call.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23151
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by O Really »

Mr.B wrote:
O Really wrote:"Mr.B finds it weird that men would dress like women, but I bet when he sees a guy wearing a kilt, he doesn't think "skirt".
I've never called a kilt a skirt; no stranger than an Indian wearing a head-dress.


'
That's what I said. But tangibly, there is no difference in a kilt and a skirt. In fact, some women's skirts are styled as a kilt. It's only in your mind that it makes a difference.

Maybe nobody knows exactly what Jesus wore because there are no contemporaneous portrayals of him personally, but it is pretty well known what styles were worn in the geographical area back then. For example,

"There is general agreement that every Jew wore three basic items of clothing. The wool or linen undergarment was the first layer. It was a voluminous sleeved tunic held in place around the waist by a rope, leather belt or cloth sash. Over that was draped a mantle or cloak, a square of cloth that served as a topcoat, blanket, bedroll or even as collateral in a loan repayable by sunset. It was draped over one shoulder or both, depending on how much freedom of movement the wearer desired. Biblical researcher Michael Marlowe adds that Jews attached blue tassels to all four corners to comply with Mosaic law. Finally, no matter how poor a person was, all Jews wore sandals. These were made either of wood or camel hide."

A "tunic" definitely isn't pants.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote:"The funny thing is that Mr.B is pretty fastidious in his dress and grooming..."
I do dress in a way that no one can confuse me with being "fruity" or a female.

"gay" one might say, way more so than me, neoplacebo or even k9nanny."
And how would that be determined?

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23151
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by O Really »

Mr.B wrote:
Vrede wrote:"The funny thing is that Mr.B is pretty fastidious in his dress and grooming..."
I do dress in a way that no one can confuse me with being "fruity" or a female.

"gay" one might say, way more so than me, neoplacebo or even k9nanny."
And how would that be determined?
I'm surprised in your collection of stereotypes regarding homosexual males that you don't know most have a very good sense of style and dress very well, and not in a way they would be considered "fruity" or a female. And some wear lumberjack style.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote:
[color=#0000FF]Mr.B[/color] wrote:
Vrede wrote:The funny thing is that Mr.B is pretty fastidious in his dress and grooming

I do dress in a way that no one can confuse me with being "fruity"

Debatable, given that gays dress many different ways.
I'm certain you'd be up to date on how "gays" dress? Accusing an anti-gay of being "gay" is supposed to be a triumph for you?

or a female.

Straw man, I didn't say that.
I did...making my point.

"gay" one might say, way more so than me, neoplacebo or even k9nanny."

And how would that be determined?

Ummm, fastidiousness, as I said.
Just like sexuality itself, dress and grooming are on a spectrum, not either/or. Yours happens to be more stereotypically elderly "gay" than ours. Your obsession with appearance can be likened, for example, to O Really's lumberjack saying that you look "fruity" to him.

I don't expect you to get the point or admit it if you do.

I know what you mean; typical whining from you.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23151
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by O Really »

Mr.B, you're missing a lot of opportunities for gay-bashing by focusing on the few who "try to look like a woman." Here's a few tips to enhance your gaydar:

1. Look at their dog. Gay guys have little frou-frou dogs, or maybe even a cat.
2. Look at their car. They drive Miatas. Clean ones.
3. They have good haircuts, sometimes with color streaks. Sometimes they're hairdressers.
4. They don't have chest hair.
5. You can find them shopping at Nordstrom's.
6. They're Bette Midler fans.
7. They wear matching tops and bottoms for gymwear.
8. They shop for groceries more in the veggie aisle than in the chip aisle.

Hopefully those clues will help.

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12435
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: War on Women

Unread post by neoplacebo »

:lol:

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: War on Women

Unread post by rstrong »

20. They don't think that all male dancers, musicians and artists are gay. (Just the good ones.)

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by Mr.B »

Ain't we blessed!? Who'da thunk we had so many "gay" experts? The cold wave from Canada even brought one in. Brrrr!

Church "decorating" committee....?

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: War on Women

Unread post by rstrong »

Don't worry; we all know that you're the most qualified gay expert here, Mr.B. You've obviously studied and pondered the issue more than anyone else.

"Cold wave?" A quick check of the weather for Raleigh shows that it's 19°F. Charlotte is 22°F. We're basking in unseasonably mild weather at -4°F right now. It'll be -26°F by Saturday night.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by Mr.B »

rstrong wrote:Don't worry; we all know that you're the most qualified gay expert here, Mr.B. You've obviously studied and pondered the issue more than anyone else.
I dunno 'bout that. According to the responses I get to my posts, there's others more highly qualified than myself.

"Cold wave?" A quick check of the weather for Raleigh shows that it's 19°F. Charlotte is 22°F. We're basking in unseasonably mild weather at -4°F right now. It'll be -26°F by Saturday night.
yep....cold wave! Right now, it's 9°F here; was 2.8°F this morning when I got up. High today was 15°F We're quite a ways from Charlotte or Raleigh; higher in elevation as well. You can have your "Alberta Clipper" back anytime you want it.

The Jet-Stream thingy....
Image

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote:"Ut-oh, Mr.B is on his church's event decorating committee. Opps."
Clueless; as to what that is.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by Mr.B »

Vrede wrote:'Because your church doesn't have events or because it doesn't decorate for them?"
Doesn't have committees.

User avatar
rstrong
Captain
Posts: 5889
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: War on Women

Unread post by rstrong »

Idaho lawmaker asks if women could swallow cameras for gynecological exams before abortion
A complete idiot who managed to get elected to The Idaho House of Representatives received a female reproductive anatomy lesson today.
[...]
Barbieri sits on the board of a crisis pregnancy center in northern Idaho, and voted in favor of the legislation, because he is an ignorant dipshit. We should just put him in charge of All Of The Things.

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2066
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: War on Women

Unread post by Boatrocker »

I knew female physiology was different, but I didn't know they shit out of their hoo-hoos.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.

User avatar
billy.pilgrim
Admiral
Posts: 15632
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by billy.pilgrim »

Vrede wrote:That's how we get GOP Idaho lawmakers.

hehe
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2066
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: War on Women

Unread post by Boatrocker »

So, that means that "traditional" vaginal sex is . . . sodomy?
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.

JTA
Commander
Posts: 3898
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:04 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by JTA »

Boatrocker wrote:So, that means that "traditional" vaginal sex is . . . sodomy?
Seems like with things like artificial insemination and what not we could just do away completely with intercourse and make it a sin no matter what.
You aren't doing it wrong if no one knows what you are doing.

JTA
Commander
Posts: 3898
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:04 pm

Re: War on Women

Unread post by JTA »

You aren't doing it wrong if no one knows what you are doing.

Post Reply