Trump on Trial

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 51736
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by Vrede too »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Fri Aug 04, 2023 7:36 pm
Is he threatening Jack Smith and potential witnesses?

Image

Yes GoCubsGo, and yes Ron. Lock him up now. At least seize TRE45QN's passport and airplane.

Not a comprehensive list, but a biting one:

Fact-Checking the Defenses of Trump After His Latest Indictment
A clown with a flamethrower still has a flamethrower.
-- Charlie Sykes on MSNBC
1312. ETTD.

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 17828
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

Jail time for Donald before trial?

Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 51736
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by Vrede too »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Fri Aug 04, 2023 7:36 pm
Is he threatening Jack Smith and potential witnesses?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F2tz1XcWEAA ... ame=medium

https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/stat ... 8631439360
People Aren't Buying Donald Trump's Explanation For 'I'm Coming After You!' Post
The ex-president's team gave a questionable defense for his ominous warning after he appeared in court for conspiracy charges related to the 2020 election.


Trying to sell a bridge there.
Somebody got a call from his lawyers.
Yeah... that argument would be a lot more compelling if this weren't the post immediately preceding the threat one.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrum ... 4321227364
Those around him realized how serious this was, but couldn't persuade him to delete or explain, so they put this out is my guess. Doubt the judge will buy this excuse unless he comes out himself and disavows.
Sure, OK, yeah, we all believe that. 😉
More tweets at the link.

Stupid begets stupid:

Greg Gutfeld Suggests Trump Can Destroy Surveillance Video For Dumbfounding Reason
The Fox News host gave a jaw-dropping take on new charges alleging that Trump ordered the deletion of incriminating footage.


Greg doesn’t know how evidence works. “Like if they’re YOUR clothes with blood on them, and there’s an open investigation into your missing spouse, why can’t YOU throw YOUR own clothes away? What a witch hunt.”
This blood-soaked knife? What's wrong with that? It's *my* knife. Why can't I throw it away? I don't understand that.
Finally, not direct responses to Gutfield:


Last edited by Vrede too on Sat Aug 05, 2023 1:35 pm, edited 4 times in total.
A clown with a flamethrower still has a flamethrower.
-- Charlie Sykes on MSNBC
1312. ETTD.

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 17828
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

LOL

Judge ain't buying it either.

Another busy weekend for trump attorneys .

Image
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 51736
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by Vrede too »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 1:27 pm
LOL

Judge ain't buying it either.

Another busy weekend for trump attorneys .

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F2yG7JXXYAA ... name=large
Note: No content changed with the editing above. I just got rid of redundant Xes. X no longer shows me the X being replied to even though it's actually embedded in the X I go to paste. :x

Also not buying it:
Ex-White House Press Secretary Says She's 'Nervous' Following Trump's 'Chilling' Post
"How is that not intimidation?" asked former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham about Trump's Truth Social post on Friday.


Stephanie Grisham, a White House press secretary under former President Donald Trump, said her ex-boss’ “chilling” Truth Social post made her “nervous” and declared that it should make other Trump critics feel similarly on Friday.

Grisham, who also served as a chief of staff to former First Lady Melania Trump, weighed in after the former president wrote “IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!” on his social media platform.

“Well, I think it’s chilling. Legally, it doesn’t seem like it’s very smart. But how is that not intimidation? And, you know, what other people are going to take a message from that?” Grisham told CNN’s Brianna Keilar on Friday.

“As we have seen and heard, people really believe that Donald Trump sent them to the Capitol and people really felt like hours later when he said to stop, they listened.”

... “Does someone have to get hurt before people take this kind of online intimidation seriously?” Grisham said.

“The people, and I know he’s pointing out the prosecutors, but you know as somebody who gets death threats every other day, it makes me nervous. It should make anybody who’s ever spoken out against him nervous. And that’s a lot of people.” ...
Is it witness intimidation if a witness says that she's intimidated?

Lock him up without internet access now!
A clown with a flamethrower still has a flamethrower.
-- Charlie Sykes on MSNBC
1312. ETTD.

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 17828
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

Vrede too wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 1:53 pm
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 1:27 pm
LOL

Judge ain't buying it either.

Another busy weekend for trump attorneys .

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F2yG7JXXYAA ... name=large
Note: No content changed with the editing above. I just got rid of redundant Xes. X no longer shows me the X being replied to even though it's actually embedded in the X I go to paste. :x

I'm not sure what all that means.

Also not buying it:
Ex-White House Press Secretary Says She's 'Nervous' Following Trump's 'Chilling' Post
"How is that not intimidation?" asked former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham about Trump's Truth Social post on Friday.


Stephanie Grisham, a White House press secretary under former President Donald Trump, said her ex-boss’ “chilling” Truth Social post made her “nervous” and declared that it should make other Trump critics feel similarly on Friday.

Grisham, who also served as a chief of staff to former First Lady Melania Trump, weighed in after the former president wrote “IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!” on his social media platform.

“Well, I think it’s chilling. Legally, it doesn’t seem like it’s very smart. But how is that not intimidation? And, you know, what other people are going to take a message from that?” Grisham told CNN’s Brianna Keilar on Friday.

“As we have seen and heard, people really believe that Donald Trump sent them to the Capitol and people really felt like hours later when he said to stop, they listened.”

... “Does someone have to get hurt before people take this kind of online intimidation seriously?” Grisham said.

“The people, and I know he’s pointing out the prosecutors, but you know as somebody who gets death threats every other day, it makes me nervous. It should make anybody who’s ever spoken out against him nervous. And that’s a lot of people.” ...
Is it witness intimidation if a witness says that she's intimidated?

Lock him up without internet access now!
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 51736
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by Vrede too »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 3:08 pm
Vrede too wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 1:53 pm
Note: No content changed with the editing above. I just got rid of redundant Xes. X no longer shows me the X being replied to even though it's actually embedded in the X I go to paste. :x
I'm not sure what all that means.
Yeah, I wondered if it was going to make sense. Sorry.
It used to be that when I opened a tweet I would see that tweet plus the tweet it responded to, along with further tweets in the conversation.
I had no way to erase the original tweet, so I knew that it would post along with the tweet I opened if I went to post the tweet I opened here. Fine, if I didn't want to keep posting the original tweet I would just copy and paste the text from the tweet I opened as I've now done above.
Now, X is just showing me one X, not the ongoing conversation and not the X it responded to. So, it looks to me like I can just post lone Xes, but in reality I'm post them along with the original X. If I'm trying to post multiple responses to that original X, I end up also posting that original X over and over.
Hence, I had to declutter by going back and replacing all the Xes that I tried to post directly with the copied and pasted text from them.
:angry-banghead: Fuck you, Elon.
A clown with a flamethrower still has a flamethrower.
-- Charlie Sykes on MSNBC
1312. ETTD.

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 17828
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

Vrede too wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:19 pm
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 3:08 pm
Vrede too wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 1:53 pm
Note: No content changed with the editing above. I just got rid of redundant Xes. X no longer shows me the X being replied to even though it's actually embedded in the X I go to paste. :x
I'm not sure what all that means.
Yeah, I wondered if it was going to make sense. Sorry.
It used to be that when I opened a tweet I would see that tweet plus the tweet it responded to, along with further tweets in the conversation.
I had no way to erase the original tweet, so I knew that it would post along with the tweet I opened if I went to post the tweet I opened here. Fine, if I didn't want to keep posting the original tweet I would just copy and paste the text from the tweet I opened as I've now done above.
Now, X is just showing me one X, not the ongoing conversation and not the X it responded to. So, it looks to me like I can just post lone Xes, but in reality I'm post them along with the original X. If I'm trying to post multiple responses to that original X, I end up also posting that original X over and over.
Hence, I had to declutter by going back and replacing all the Xes that I tried to post directly with the copied and pasted text from them.
:angry-banghead: Fuck you, Elon.
Ah, from the no account thing.
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 17828
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

Judge ain't playing.

Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 17828
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

Cheetohead may see the inside of a jail cell sooner than we think.

Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 51736
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by Vrede too »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:45 pm
Cheetohead may see the inside of a jail cell sooner than we think.

https://twitter.com/MeidasTouch/status/ ... 1920669696
Full lying, moronic whine from TRE45QN:

Image

:roll: Lock him up!
A clown with a flamethrower still has a flamethrower.
-- Charlie Sykes on MSNBC
1312. ETTD.

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 17828
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

Vrede too wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:55 pm
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:45 pm
Cheetohead may see the inside of a jail cell sooner than we think.

https://twitter.com/MeidasTouch/status/ ... 1920669696
Full lying, moronic whine from TRE45QN:

Image

:roll: Lock him up!
I don't think he thinks it could happen.

I hope he's wrong.

But the wingnuts really would go wild.

I don't know, maybe that needs to happen and get a bunch more locked up.
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.

User avatar
billy.pilgrim
Admiral
Posts: 15632
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by billy.pilgrim »

Do to him same as Germany did to his grandfather


Exile
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 17828
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

If she's not outright in the bag for Donald then she's just not up to the job.

Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 21585
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by O Really »

Well, this is depressing.

"More than half of Americans believe Trump tried to stay in office illegally: poll"

Only 51%? Seriously? We're effin' doomed.
The new CBS News poll found that 51 percent of Americans think that Trump tried to stay in office beyond his term through “illegal and unconstitutional” means. Twenty-nine percent said he tried to stay in office using legal means and 20 percent said the former president did not attempt to stay in office.

The poll was conducted after Trump was indicted on four federal charges related to his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/more-half-am ... 16397.html

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 51736
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by Vrede too »

O Really wrote:
Mon Aug 07, 2023 1:12 pm
Well, this is depressing.

"More than half of Americans believe Trump tried to stay in office illegally: poll"

Only 51%? Seriously? We're effin' doomed.
The new CBS News poll found that 51 percent of Americans think that Trump tried to stay in office beyond his term through “illegal and unconstitutional” means. Twenty-nine percent said he tried to stay in office using legal means and 20 percent said the former president did not attempt to stay in office.

The poll was conducted after Trump was indicted on four federal charges related to his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/more-half-am ... 16397.html
"20 percent said the former president did not attempt to stay in office."

:headscratch: :wtf: :headscratch: :wtf: :headscratch: :wtf:


Judge dismisses Trump's defamation claim against E. Jean Carroll
:---P :happy-cheerleaderkid:
A clown with a flamethrower still has a flamethrower.
-- Charlie Sykes on MSNBC
1312. ETTD.

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 17828
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

This will convince the judge fer sure.

Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.

User avatar
billy.pilgrim
Admiral
Posts: 15632
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by billy.pilgrim »

GoCubsGo wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 1:27 pm
LOL

Judge ain't buying it either.

Another busy weekend for trump attorneys .

Image
Well, did he respond?
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”

User avatar
Vrede too
Superstar Cultmaster
Posts: 51736
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by Vrede too »

billy.pilgrim wrote:
Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:58 pm
GoCubsGo wrote:
Sat Aug 05, 2023 1:27 pm
LOL

Judge ain't buying it either.

Another busy weekend for trump attorneys .

Image
Well, did he respond?
Yes, just before the deadline.
A clown with a flamethrower still has a flamethrower.
-- Charlie Sykes on MSNBC
1312. ETTD.

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 17828
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Trump on Trial

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

billy.pilgrim wrote:
Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:58 pm


Well, did he respond?
Part of it is what I posted above. ⬆️⬆️
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.

Post Reply