Censoring is Ridiculous on Blueridgenow

k9nanny · Unread post by **k9nanny** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:38 am

As of 6:30am, lefty, deleted.
Did you get a warning or an answer?

DooHickey · Unread post by **DooHickey** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:02 am

Vrede wrote:DooHickey posted a pic of a gagged woman, it disappeared.

Post it here, it was a good one.

k9nanny · Unread post by **k9nanny** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:22 am

Great picture, DooHickey.
The obits have been fixed, and the cheerleader gallery no longer has the prime spot in the upper left corner.

bannination · Unread post by **bannination** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:33 am

At least they're now consistent.

I guess they're revenge is banning and deleting comment history of everyone pointing out their hypocrisy.

Along with deleting the censored woman avatar, which was great btw, they deleted my avatar as well.

Sometime Lefty · Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:22 pm

k9nanny wrote:As of 6:30am, lefty, deleted.
Did you get a warning or an answer?

Nothing. Into the memoryhole I guess.

k9nanny · Unread post by **k9nanny** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 1:38 pm

Vrede wrote:Management is now hiding their online status, defending Big Ugly and John Fogle, and deleting threads titled, "Free Speech". Chickenshits.

Nascar is also being an ass.
Fools (auto correct for Fogle) became suddenly prolific when all this crap started.

Wneglia · Unread post by **Wneglia** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:00 pm

I had a post censored BEFORE I even had a chance to post it.

I had this link ready: http://www.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeedpolitic ... o-fuck-off
and when I went to preview it, the link got deleted. They must now have some sort of net nanny software that kills stuff automatically.

DooHickey · Unread post by **DooHickey** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:56 pm

Information
You have been banned from this board until Mon Oct 01, 2012 8:40 am.

Please contact the Board Administrator for more information.

Reason given for ban: We reserve the right to remove the posting privileges of users
who violate these standards of Forum behavior at any time.

A ban has been issued on your username.

Dip-shit. I didn't post anything profane or attacking. I posted a photo relevant to censorship;
no words, just a photo.

DooHickey · Unread post by **DooHickey** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:56 pm

Information
You have been banned from this board until Mon Oct 01, 2012 8:40 am.

Please contact the Board Administrator for more information.

Reason given for ban: We reserve the right to remove the posting privileges of users
who violate these standards of Forum behavior at any time.

A ban has been issued on your username.

Dip-shit. I didn't post anything profane or attacking. I posted a photo relevant to censorship;
no words, just a photo.

DooHickey · Unread post by **DooHickey** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:02 pm

Oh yeah, another thing. I posted a reply to Bannination; his post got deleted. I asked "how did I reply to Bannination
if.....never mind I don't want to know". That post got deleted. If that's not censorship, it's missing a damn good chance.

bannination · Unread post by **bannination** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:23 pm

Vrede wrote:Only posters allowed this afternoon: John Fogle, Big Ugly, nascarfan88.

It's not possible to create a more dishonest, uninformed, cowardly, hateful and inane forum. Good job BRN!

You read my mind, I was getting ready to post the same thing.

John Fogle trying to disprove man-made global warming with psychology.

Red Herring in every post and they eat it up.

bannination · Unread post by **bannination** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:31 pm

President Obama leads Mitt Romney among NASCAR fans, 48%-41%

Link

Proof some nascarfan's aren't idiots.

I bet it'll get deleted, so posting it here too.... I though it was ironic!

k9nanny · Unread post by **k9nanny** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:35 pm

Don't leave out Doc's Elizabeth Warren thread starter. Not a single liberal-ish poster has been allowed to challenge his sources.
Shame on you, Doc. At this point, you should be baiting the cons.

(You don't need to be licensed in a state if you're arguing a Federal case. I'm sure O Really could shed some light on that whole aspect of the law.)

Bungalow Bill · Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:14 pm

You didn't really except these jokers to allow something like a Free Speech thread!!

Foolgle, Big Ugly, and nascar. Talk about the bottom of the barrel. It ain't the three
wise men.

Foolgle was gone for a while, then he came back when the Libyan embassy attack
happened. Whether it was just coincidence that the crack down happened around the
same time, I don't know.

Those sexy cheerleaders have been around a while, at least in the NFL. That one looks
like she has to go and is desperately holding it in.

Leo L, MrX, MrB etc. · Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:59 pm

Stinger wrote:Hi, guys. Ya miss me?

Damn! There goes the neighborhood!

Good to hear from you again, you old jerkwad!

Stinger · Unread post by **Stinger** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:03 pm

Leo L, MrX, MrB etc. wrote:
Stinger wrote:Hi, guys. Ya miss me?
jerkwad!

Isn't that against the terms of service?

k9nanny · Unread post by **k9nanny** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:27 pm

Well, we know that bow has been lurking over here.

http://forum.blueridgenow.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=5497

The Piper wrote:
nascarfan88 wrote:
You hear wrong then....I was given my own time out by the new mod about two weeks ago. Got parked for a week!!!

A whole week! wow! Everybody else got two weeks or more; how'd you spring that one?
I was parked for a week too.....by me.

Might want to go check K9nanny's complaints on "the other forum". Seems she was only given a week:

Re: Censoring is Ridiculous on Blueridgenow
Post Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:59 am
k9nanny

Posts: 38

That took less than 90 seconds.

You have been banned from this board until Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:35 am.

Please contact the Board Administrator for more information.

Reason given for ban: Ignored repeated warnings of unacceptable behavior.

A ban has been issued on your username.

By my count that is only one week. On the other hand it could be that once I got my hand slapped I stopped reaching for the cookie jar. I changed my avatar and signature as requested and have done my best to comply with the rest of the rules. Funny what happens when you act like an adult....you actually get TREATED like one!

Boy Howdy- He's been soooooo adult today. Reckon it's safe to do your lib bashing when there are few libs allowed to post. What a big, brave man!!!!!!! Just remember, karma is a bitch.

hey, nascar, donjon think rj's full of chit post is adult behavior? I would love to hear your theory as to why it remains. I got spanked either for "disparaging" remarks about your taxpayer funded benefits, or for calling you and Det.Thorn "sexist pigs", because you think birth control = promiscuity.

\V/ · Unread post by **\V/** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:02 pm

k9nanny wrote:Well, we know that bow has been lurking over here.

But why, oh why hasn't the coward shown himself...scratch that, I just answered myself didn't I?

Leo L · Unread post by **Leo L** » Tue Sep 25, 2012 6:57 am

A Question For The HT/N Administration
by The Piper Ã‚Â» Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:30 pm

I am curious as to why you don't/won't answer any of the questions put to you by the various forum members when they ask you why you delete posts and/or ban the posters when they post something you don't agree with. The language and referencing to bad language has been stopped, but yet I have read the posts made by some only to find them deleted later, or find they have been banned for differing amounts of time. Other than the quote-unquote "canned response" you issue, can you please explain in plain English why you have resorted to these tactics and why it is necessary to ban posters when an established rule has not been broken?

Your rule states you have the right to delete posts found to be offensive; offensive to whom? Is questioning you deemed offensive?

Next question is, are you going to issue me a warning or ban me for "questioning your authority"? Or would you be kind enough to respond to my query in a gentlemanly fashion?

Information
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.

So much for "a gentlemanly fashion".

Piper are you so naive you actually thought those morons would "respond to (your) query in a gentlemanly fashion"? They're on a power trip.

bannination · Unread post by **bannination** » Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:46 am

Well, with the wingnuts left to their own devices, they'll look more moronic than usual IMHO.