Yeah, but you're spin ain't working. You got nothing to back it up but the usual knee-jerk conjecture, distortions, and outright lies.Supsalemgr wrote:And the spin continues.
SSDD.
Yeah, but you're spin ain't working. You got nothing to back it up but the usual knee-jerk conjecture, distortions, and outright lies.Supsalemgr wrote:And the spin continues.
If you're talking about Tertius, he has a full-blown lunatic conspiracy from the bowels of the right-wing extremist bottom-feeder pit. Freeper stuff.Brother wrote:When somebody says that the President knew about the attack and did nothing mean? What would you have had him do? And do you think that the American public had the right to know everything the Whitehouse knew when they knew it?
How do you know it wasn't acted upon?Supsalemgr wrote:How about a quick "spin" on why the drone video was not acted upon?
LINKat the start of the attack, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta "looked at available options, and the ones we exercised had our military forces arrive in less than 24 hours, well ahead of timelines laid out in established policies."
Two Americans did die six hours into the attack, but Stevens was long dead.Rick Nelson, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a former Navy pilot who worked in counter-terrorism, says such missions can be very risky. "A lot can go well, right, as we saw with the bin Laden raid. It was a very successful event," he says. "But also, when there are high risk activities like this. a lot can go wrong, as we saw with the Iranian hostage rescue decades ago."
I think you should go to Benghazi and find out just exactly what happened and report back to us. Don't forget your weapons.Supsalemgr wrote:Sorry Vrede doesn't agree with me starting a thread just in this topic.However, in my view I believe it deserves special attention. If Vrede does not, she can ignore the thread and make it more to the point.
Reality wrote:"What did you expect him to do" should be put on Obama's campaign posters. Kinda like pleading the 5th.
Have you ever heard that feces draws more flies than sugar. If not just follow this thread and watch the libs swarm.
In the face of daily threats worldwide, U.S. diplomacy plays a central and pivotal role. At embassies around the globe, United States diplomats work to create a more secure, democratic, and prosperous world for the people of America, and for people everywhere. It is essential that these diplomats be able to function in a safe environment, and that their facilities and materials are secure at all times.Stinger wrote:Tertius wrote: the other discussion I started centers around the setting up of a gay American Ambassador to be murdered, the failure ti deploy and withdrawal of security, and the failure of the administration to permit our forces in the area to rescue the last two murdered.
Stupid bullshit fairy tale. None of it's true. You still haven't given any facts in support of your poppycock, and it's been several days.
You have, however, completely bungled the situation with tales on nonexistent Marines, nonexistent Special Forces, forces that could have saved Stevens when he died from smoke inhalation early in the attack, and tales of the "Chicago diplomatic circle."
You have no credibility.
I think that can be the focus of the other discussion.
The focus of the other discussion is your extreme gullibility and complete lack of credibility.
Here we can discuss the Obama-Clinton coverup and attempt to postpone findings of the study of the events until after the election.
Coverup? Another right-wing goose chase. You dumbasses never learn. How'd that Fast and Furious thing work out for you?
Stinger wrote:How do you know it wasn't acted upon?Supsalemgr wrote:How about a quick "spin" on why the drone video was not acted upon?
A force was sent from Tripoli.
LINKat the start of the attack, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta "looked at available options, and the ones we exercised had our military forces arrive in less than 24 hours, well ahead of timelines laid out in established policies."
It sounds like they exercised something. They just didn't get there in time.
Launching attacks over sovereign air space is a touchy matter.
Damn. How weak of Stinger. We have our ambassador and other citizens in peril and he is concerned our action is a "touchy" matter with a questionable goverment.
Launching an attack with good intel and good planning is risky. Sometimes you end up with planes crashing in the desert and sometimes you end up killing bin Laden.
Launching an attack with next-to-no intel and no planning can be downright foolish.
Two Americans did die six hours into the attack, but Stevens was long dead.Rick Nelson, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a former Navy pilot who worked in counter-terrorism, says such missions can be very risky. "A lot can go well, right, as we saw with the bin Laden raid. It was a very successful event," he says. "But also, when there are high risk activities like this. a lot can go wrong, as we saw with the Iranian hostage rescue decades ago."
What's your proposal? "We should have done something." Exactly what should we have done?
I wonder if a Benghazi is faster than a Bugatti?billy.pilgrim wrote:did this MSN creature actually get On a benghazi?
neoplacebo wrote:I wonder if a Benghazi is faster than a Bugatti?billy.pilgrim wrote:did this MSN creature actually get On a benghazi?
Reality wrote:"What did you expect him to do" should be put on Obama's campaign posters.
There are presidential responsibilities, and there are responsibilities that aren't the presidents'. this wasn't the presidents', and no amount of lies, distortions, spin, or wishful delusions by the cons can make it his decision.
Kinda like pleading the 5th.
No. Just explaining reality to the impaired.
Have you ever heard that feces draws more flies than sugar.
That explains the constant buzzing sound that comes from your posts.
Do the neighbors complain much?
If not just follow this thread and watch the libs swarm.
That would make us the flies and you the feces, right?
Supsalemgr wrote:I take full responsibility for my posts. I am not really concerned that Vrede does not like them.
Here's the story:billy.pilgrim wrote:Supsalemgr wrote:I take full responsibility for my posts. I am not really concerned that Vrede does not like them.
so, if you actually believe that the MSM got on the benghazis, why won't you tell us why?
are they comfortable to sit on, or ride-able or offer a view of the surroundings
we want the hole story