The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Soupy Sales is in on the Kool Aid chugging.

Unread post by Stinger »

Supsalemgr wrote:And the spin continues.
Yeah, but you're spin ain't working. You got nothing to back it up but the usual knee-jerk conjecture, distortions, and outright lies.

SSDD.

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by Stinger »

Brother wrote:When somebody says that the President knew about the attack and did nothing mean? What would you have had him do? And do you think that the American public had the right to know everything the Whitehouse knew when they knew it?
If you're talking about Tertius, he has a full-blown lunatic conspiracy from the bowels of the right-wing extremist bottom-feeder pit. Freeper stuff.

It's so far-fetched that even the normal Obama-hating loons will have nothing to do with it.

Check out the thread about the Obama-Clinton-murder stupidity.

Supsalemgr
Marshal
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by Supsalemgr »

How about a quick "spin" on why the drone video was not acted upon?

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by Stinger »

Supsalemgr wrote:How about a quick "spin" on why the drone video was not acted upon?
How do you know it wasn't acted upon?

A force was sent from Tripoli.
at the start of the attack, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta "looked at available options, and the ones we exercised had our military forces arrive in less than 24 hours, well ahead of timelines laid out in established policies."
LINK

It sounds like they exercised something. They just didn't get there in time.

Launching attacks over sovereign air space is a touchy matter.

Launching an attack with good intel and good planning is risky. Sometimes you end up with planes crashing in the desert and sometimes you end up killing bin Laden.

Launching an attack with next-to-no intel and no planning can be downright foolish.
Rick Nelson, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a former Navy pilot who worked in counter-terrorism, says such missions can be very risky. "A lot can go well, right, as we saw with the bin Laden raid. It was a very successful event," he says. "But also, when there are high risk activities like this. a lot can go wrong, as we saw with the Iranian hostage rescue decades ago."
Two Americans did die six hours into the attack, but Stevens was long dead.

What's your proposal? "We should have done something." Exactly what should we have done?

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by Reality »

"What did you expect him to do" should be put on Obama's campaign posters. Kinda like pleading the 5th.

Have you ever heard that feces draws more flies than sugar. If not just follow this thread and watch the libs swarm.

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12435
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by neoplacebo »

Supsalemgr wrote:Sorry Vrede doesn't agree with me starting a thread just in this topic. :( However, in my view I believe it deserves special attention. If Vrede does not, she can ignore the thread and make it more to the point.
I think you should go to Benghazi and find out just exactly what happened and report back to us. Don't forget your weapons.

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by Reality »

PBO, I believe exactly what happened has already been reported.

BTW, has anyone heard from Hillary lately?

Brother
Red Shirt
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:50 pm

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by Brother »

Reality wrote:"What did you expect him to do" should be put on Obama's campaign posters. Kinda like pleading the 5th.

Have you ever heard that feces draws more flies than sugar. If not just follow this thread and watch the libs swarm.

I get it. If what you consider a liberal posts it is considered "swarming" but if you consider them a Conservative then that's just good critical thinking, right. You didn't answer the question either. What did you expect the President to do when he found out about the murders? Bomb all of Syria? That's GOOD foreign politics there...

Reality
Wing commander
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:39 am

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by Reality »

I expected the POTUS to not be a part of the deception that haunted this debacle by his Department of State and his White House Staff from the get go. What did you expect?

He had the info on what really happened and allowed the charade to continue. He's the POTUS for Gods sake. Why don't you and the others quit acting Presidential (this President) and come clean rather than continuing the alibi charade.
Last edited by Reality on Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tertius
Squadron Leader
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: Soupy Sales is in on the Kool Aid chugging.

Unread post by Tertius »

Stinger wrote:
Tertius wrote: the other discussion I started centers around the setting up of a gay American Ambassador to be murdered, the failure ti deploy and withdrawal of security, and the failure of the administration to permit our forces in the area to rescue the last two murdered.

Stupid bullshit fairy tale. None of it's true. You still haven't given any facts in support of your poppycock, and it's been several days.

You have, however, completely bungled the situation with tales on nonexistent Marines, nonexistent Special Forces, forces that could have saved Stevens when he died from smoke inhalation early in the attack, and tales of the "Chicago diplomatic circle."

You have no credibility.


I think that can be the focus of the other discussion.

The focus of the other discussion is your extreme gullibility and complete lack of credibility.

Here we can discuss the Obama-Clinton coverup and attempt to postpone findings of the study of the events until after the election.

Coverup? Another right-wing goose chase. You dumbasses never learn. How'd that Fast and Furious thing work out for you?
In the face of daily threats worldwide, U.S. diplomacy plays a central and pivotal role. At embassies around the globe, United States diplomats work to create a more secure, democratic, and prosperous world for the people of America, and for people everywhere. It is essential that these diplomats be able to function in a safe environment, and that their facilities and materials are secure at all times.

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/138440.pdf

The Obama State Department withdrew a 16 member special forces team from Benghazi one month before the deadly attacks on 9-11. Lt. Col. Andy Wood was the leader of the 16 member special forces team whose job it was to protect US personnel in Libya. His team’s mission ended in August a month before the deadly Al-Qaeda attack on 9-11. A six member mobile security team was also withdrawn around the same time. This was despite the fact that there were over a dozen attacks in the country this year. Lt. Col. Wood was subpoenaed to appear at a House committee hearing this coming week. Wood told CBS News it was unbelievable to him that the State Department withdrew security when they did because of the 13 security incidents before 9-11.g

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/10 ... ack-video/

User avatar
billy.pilgrim
Admiral
Posts: 15632
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by billy.pilgrim »

I'm still just trying to figure out how or why the MSN got On benghazi. it's not fair when tag uses secret language in his threads
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”

Supsalemgr
Marshal
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by Supsalemgr »

Stinger wrote:
Supsalemgr wrote:How about a quick "spin" on why the drone video was not acted upon?
How do you know it wasn't acted upon?

A force was sent from Tripoli.
at the start of the attack, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta "looked at available options, and the ones we exercised had our military forces arrive in less than 24 hours, well ahead of timelines laid out in established policies."
LINK

It sounds like they exercised something. They just didn't get there in time.

Launching attacks over sovereign air space is a touchy matter.

Damn. How weak of Stinger. We have our ambassador and other citizens in peril and he is concerned our action is a "touchy" matter with a questionable goverment.

Launching an attack with good intel and good planning is risky. Sometimes you end up with planes crashing in the desert and sometimes you end up killing bin Laden.

Launching an attack with next-to-no intel and no planning can be downright foolish.
Rick Nelson, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a former Navy pilot who worked in counter-terrorism, says such missions can be very risky. "A lot can go well, right, as we saw with the bin Laden raid. It was a very successful event," he says. "But also, when there are high risk activities like this. a lot can go wrong, as we saw with the Iranian hostage rescue decades ago."
Two Americans did die six hours into the attack, but Stevens was long dead.

What's your proposal? "We should have done something." Exactly what should we have done?

User avatar
billy.pilgrim
Admiral
Posts: 15632
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by billy.pilgrim »

did this MSN creature actually get On a benghazi?
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12435
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by neoplacebo »

billy.pilgrim wrote:did this MSN creature actually get On a benghazi?
I wonder if a Benghazi is faster than a Bugatti?

User avatar
billy.pilgrim
Admiral
Posts: 15632
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by billy.pilgrim »

neoplacebo wrote:
billy.pilgrim wrote:did this MSN creature actually get On a benghazi?
I wonder if a Benghazi is faster than a Bugatti?

I bet tag won't tell us - he's a boy with many secrets
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by Stinger »

Reality wrote:"What did you expect him to do" should be put on Obama's campaign posters.

There are presidential responsibilities, and there are responsibilities that aren't the presidents'. this wasn't the presidents', and no amount of lies, distortions, spin, or wishful delusions by the cons can make it his decision.

Kinda like pleading the 5th.

No. Just explaining reality to the impaired.

Have you ever heard that feces draws more flies than sugar.

That explains the constant buzzing sound that comes from your posts.

Do the neighbors complain much?


If not just follow this thread and watch the libs swarm.

That would make us the flies and you the feces, right?

Supsalemgr
Marshal
Posts: 915
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by Supsalemgr »

I take full responsibility for my posts. I am not really concerned that Vrede does not like them.

User avatar
billy.pilgrim
Admiral
Posts: 15632
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:44 pm

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by billy.pilgrim »

Supsalemgr wrote:I take full responsibility for my posts. I am not really concerned that Vrede does not like them.

so, if you actually believe that the MSM got on the benghazis, why won't you tell us why?

are they comfortable to sit on, or ride-able or offer a view of the surroundings

we want the hole story
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”

User avatar
gongoozler
Pilot Officer
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by gongoozler »

billy.pilgrim wrote:
Supsalemgr wrote:I take full responsibility for my posts. I am not really concerned that Vrede does not like them.

so, if you actually believe that the MSM got on the benghazis, why won't you tell us why?

are they comfortable to sit on, or ride-able or offer a view of the surroundings

we want the hole story
Here's the story:

The MSM creature is a deceitful animal. It constantly looks out for its own fairy tale views and rarely if ever tells the full truth without mixing in pixie dust to make reality seem more like what it wants the world to see.

The Benghazi is a train leading away from the truth that out leader has been working feverishly to hide. The MSM joined our leader on The Benghazi for a ride to NeverNever Land.

The End (of our leader's term).

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23149
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The MSM Is On the Benghazi Coverup

Unread post by O Really »

I don't know what you guys can do about Benghazi, but you better get out to the FEMA trailers on Upward road before they unload the black helicopters and start collecting our guns.

Post Reply