do you get a prize for lying about what someone else says

[Stinger]

Defective Colon:

Instead of posting stupid, pointless, lie-filled rants, post proof of your accusations.

Here's where we stand.

I post proof that you endlessly repeat lies, even after you're proved to be lying.

You deceptively edit other's quotes to make it appear that they said something they didn't.

Instead of stopping your lying or at least manning up and admitting it, you go full retard and start whining about some event in the past that you can't prove . . . while adding even more lies to your compilation.

Best you can do, I guess.

[Colonel Taylor]

Coming to a Forum near you
The Stinger Lie and Deny Show.
How to get a Forum Shut Down in One easy Step.


attachment=0]chris-crocker-crying[1].jpg[/attachment]

Defective Colon:

Instead of posting stupid, pointless, lie-filled rants, post proof of your accusations.

Here's where we stand.

I post proof that you endlessly repeat lies, even after you're proved to be lying.

You deceptively edit other's quotes to make it appear that they said something they didn't.

Instead of stopping your lying or at least manning up and admitting it, you go full retard and start whining about some event in the past that you can't prove . . . while adding even more lies to your compilation.

Best you can do, I guess.

[Stinger]

Stinger: Posts 9 examples of Defective Colon lying/editing posts.

Defective Colon: Posts 0 examples of Stinger lying/editing posts.

Stinger: Smart enough to know there's no contest.

Defective Colon: Stupid enough to keep whining and making an ass out of himself . . . again.

[Stinger]

How to get a Forum Shut Down in One easy Step.

Stinger: On Gainesville Sun forum when it was shut down (at the same time the Ocala Star Banner forum and others were shut down -- Stinger was not on those forums).

Defective Colon: On Blue Ridge Now forum when it was shut down.

Stinger: Smart enough to know that neither Stinger nor Defective Colon got any forums shut down.

Defective Colon: Stupid enough to believe that Stinger magically got a forum shut down while blind and hypocritical and stupid enough not to apply the exact same standards to himself.

Typical rightie.

[billy.pilgrim]

especially when there is an audio and video tape of what they said


I really don't get it, why would anyone want to come on these anonymous boards and humiliate themselves - even anonymously, yet tag and the kernel can't seem to get enough. and the ragin moron, he uses 2 lies for his signature line

is there any possibility that they don't understand creditability

is the ideology so strong that it overcomes reality

do they think they get a prize for arguing with reality
do they argue with stop signs


tag, I'll have a conversation with you, but if you are going to dump an over-proven lie at the end of your next feel good story, like the one about the local business, expect to get your ass beat for tacking on the lie - again

Does this include those people like me who go on incessantly about trivial bs that no one cares about or do you mean the real liars, people who base their major decisions on false information and then when the information is proved false, they refuse to accept the facts and just continue to bleat on placing opinion over fact?

yes kernel to the latter, this thread was intended to discuss how some people are able to go on literally for years asserting information that is known to be false, but they continue to do it anyway because it supports their beliefs or makes them feel good
acorn voter fraud is a recent example
frd didn't help end the depression and we saved france from the nazis are two that continue to persist for over 50 years now

but I accept that I didn't make myself clear in the title of the thread and do now hereby award you the prize for distorting more inconsequential trivia than anyone on this forum.

the prize be a suitable for framing picture of the last white American president with his close (very close) friend sheik barbar

[Stinger]

Does this include those people like me who go on incessantly about trivial bs that no one cares about or do you mean the real liars, people who base their major decisions on false information and then when the information is proved false, they refuse to accept the facts and just continue to bleat on placing opinion over fact?

yes kernel to the latter, this thread was intended to discuss how some people are able to go on literally for years asserting information that is known to be false, but they continue to do it anyway because it supports their beliefs or makes them feel good

Colonel Asshat does that too.

[mike]

What's really funny is the smug surety with which they deny reality and make complete fools of themselves.

Watching Clint Eastwood rant at an imaginary Obama over Republican-imagined talking points was weird enough. But even that went to a whole new level when the crowd of Republican leaders clapped and barked like trained seals when Eastwood ridiculed Obama for having invaded Afghanistan.

I missed that.

I missed that as well!

I didn't ... I remember it well, that was the point wherein I felt sorry for Eastwood. I've always liked his movies. He got me through the rehabilitation of my shoulder after I crashed my '65 'Vette.
I watched every Clint Eastwood movie out at the time - even all of the Spaghetti Westerns.

His speech at the RNC was a sad day for me ... again, I felt really sorry for the old dude.

[mike]

In case you all are disagreeing over semantics:

Eastwood: ...I know you were against the war in Iraq, and that's okay. But you thought the war in Afghanistan was OK. You know, I mean -- you thought that was something worth doing. We didn't check with the Russians to see how did it -- they did there for 10 years.

(APPLAUSE)

But we did it, and it is something to be thought about, and I think that, when we get to maybe -- I think you've mentioned something about having a target date for bringing everybody home. You gave that target date, and I think Mr. Romney asked the only sensible question, you know, he says, ``Why are you giving the date out now? Why don't you just bring them home tomorrow morning?''...

(APPLAUSE)

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08 ... z2DUIryPta

So, he didn't say Obama invaded Afghanistan, but he also didn't mention that Shrub did; he did criticize Obama's occupation but never mentioned Shrub's still longer one; he praised Mitten's question, but never mentioned that Mitten did not ever once hint that he would "just bring them home tomorrow morning". The GOP conventioneers ate it up, not once recognizing that Clint was really damning the GOP's policy even more than Obama's.

Exactly, Vrede.

[rstrong]

So, he didn't say Obama invaded Afghanistan, but he also didn't mention that Shrub did; he did criticize Obama's occupation but never mentioned Shrub's still longer one; he praised Mitten's question, but never mentioned that Mitten did not ever once hint that he would "just bring them home tomorrow morning". The GOP conventioneers ate it up, not once recognizing that Clint was really damning the GOP's policy even more than Obama's.

One nitpick there: Invasion and occupation are two different things.

I would have supported the invasion to capture bin Laden, Mullah Omar, etc., or at the very least to remove their government. Then I would have turned power over to the tribes to hold their own territories. Let THEM nation-build, if they wanted.

I would not have supported a long-term occupation. Certainly not one where the US occupies it with a minimal force, while it goes on an adventure in Iraq for almost a decade.

And I doubt that Obama was expecting that if he supported the invasion of Afghanistan.

All through the 2008 election campaign the Republicans claimed that Obama would "cut and run" from Iraq and Afghanistan. He didn't. And so the wars instead became "Obama's wars." And that's what Eastwood was doing; making American involvement in Afghanistan "Obama's war", with not a Republican involved in the decision.