Sickophants

[Ulysses]

He just might be a boomer.

[GoCubsGo]

Someone had a few cocktails with his dinner.

[GoCubsGo]

He hasn't sobered up yet.

[GoCubsGo]

:laughing-rofl:

[neoplacebo]

Looks to me like he's got that enlarged balls syndrome. It appears to be a terminal case.

[GoCubsGo]

This is real.

[GoCubsGo]

How to be unemployed for a long time.

[billy.pilgrim]

This is real.

Who is the tat on the side of his dumbass face?
At first I thought it was Wilbur Van Snobbe, but the hair is wrong.

[GoCubsGo]

This is real.

Who is the tat on the side of his dumbass face?
At first I thought it was Wilbur Van Snobbe, but the hair is wrong.

Pretty sure it's Richie Rich.

[billy.pilgrim]

This is real.

Who is the tat on the side of his dumbass face?
At first I thought it was Wilbur Van Snobbe, but the hair is wrong.

Pretty sure it's Richie Rich.

Yep
The guy makes for a true suburban legend

[Ulysses]

I doubt those are real tats. At least I hope they aren't. If they are real, that guy is definitely cra.

Of course all the Trump shit is a big clue.

I just cannot understand how he snagged that lady, who doesn't look half-bad.

Oh, wait. Just watched some of the other video of that nut. The tats look more faded, but still there. Who knows? Who cares? I sure don't.

[GoCubsGo]

Seriously.
Did someone schedule a full moon and not tell the rest of us?








There's probably more but it makes my head hurt.

[O Really]

Has there ever been such craziness given any kind of credibility before? Consider the claims (later shown to be true) that were ridiculed, ignored, disputed, etc. that weren't nearly as crazy sounding as this stuff. Would a President actually authorize a break-in into the opposing party headquarters? Naaaa. No way.

[Ulysses]

Has there ever been such craziness given any kind of credibility before? Consider the claims (later shown to be true) that were ridiculed, ignored, disputed, etc. that weren't nearly as crazy sounding as this stuff. Would a President actually authorize a break-in into the opposing party headquarters? Naaaa. No way.

Ummm. I'll take a wild guess: Watergate?

[neoplacebo]

Christian fascists and GQP nutjobs drive the narrative and make it about their own grievance and "religious liberty" which is actually the "liberty" to discriminate and denigrate and shame anyone who doesn't fit their own version of "America" or share their own religion. We overlook this at our peril.

[billy.pilgrim]

Since the beginning of rove, anytime there has been a republican scandal brewing, up pops some similar content but insanely imaginary or overblown dem scandal that makes any charges against republicans look like petty retaliation.

Why don't we hear about the ES&E or SE&S or whatever they're called?
Why aren't we investigating why Biden- trump votes count was nearly 400 votes off?

We don’t hear a word about these other races.
votes for trump and senators was similar to polling in the Dominion states.
Dominion machines can't be controlled remotely

But in the states using other big company (ES&E or SE&S or whatever) republicans ran 10 to 15 points above polling
These machines were designed for remote access and were only recently asked politely to disable the feature
but we can't open a big investigation because we would look bad day in and day out on fox news.

Still, it's time to call them on their lies. Too bad Obama didn't use his speaking abilities a little more as the cheer leader type that trump is.
It's looking more and more like an end to the days of the statesman; from now on it's the movie actor, governator, sports hero, or reality tv host backed by the most dark money who wins in a landslide of voter suppression.

[Vrede too]

Has there ever been such craziness given any kind of credibility before? Consider the claims (later shown to be true) that were ridiculed, ignored, disputed, etc. that weren't nearly as crazy sounding as this stuff. Would a President actually authorize a break-in into the opposing party headquarters? Naaaa. No way.

Ummm. I'll take a wild guess: Watergate?

Conversely:


When was America great? Trump supporters face the ultimate test. #shorts

"Correct."

[Vrede too]

Christian fascists and GQP nutjobs drive the narrative and make it about their own grievance and "religious liberty" which is actually the "liberty" to discriminate and denigrate and shame anyone who doesn't fit their own version of "America" or share their own religion. We overlook this at our peril.

Yup.

84% of Trump voters worry about discrimination against whites and think Christianity is under attack

... "American racial and ethnic politics have reached their breaking point," begins the report, contrasting Biden voters' views with those of Trump voters....

The polling found that 52% of Trump voters said they strongly agreed with the statement, "I worry that discrimination against whites will increase significantly in the next few years," a figure that rises to 84% when including those that somewhat agree. An even higher percentage, 61%, strongly agreed with the notion that "Christianity is under attack in American today," which also rises to 84% when including people who somewhat agree.

Meanwhile, Biden voters largely disagreed. On both counts, only 38% of Biden voters strongly or somewhat agreed that anti-white discrimination is a problem and that Christianity is under attack. 91% of Democrats strongly or somewhat agreed that "system racism in America is a real and serious problem."

Further polling conducted by the group revealed just how tied to immigration Trump voter's concerns were; upwards of 80% of them strongly or somewhat agreed that they were worried about paying higher taxes due to illegal immigrants using healthcare, welfare, and education resources. A similar percentage were strongly or somewhat in agreement with the notion that they would "suffer personally" from the US being more socialist as a result of immigration.

"Trump voters are deeply and personally animated by a strong anti-immigration sentiment that unites their thinking across previously distinct and separate policy areas," the report observes....

[neoplacebo]

Christian fascists and GQP nutjobs drive the narrative and make it about their own grievance and "religious liberty" which is actually the "liberty" to discriminate and denigrate and shame anyone who doesn't fit their own version of "America" or share their own religion. We overlook this at our peril.

Yup.

84% of Trump voters worry about discrimination against whites and think Christianity is under attack

... "American racial and ethnic politics have reached their breaking point," begins the report, contrasting Biden voters' views with those of Trump voters....

The polling found that 52% of Trump voters said they strongly agreed with the statement, "I worry that discrimination against whites will increase significantly in the next few years," a figure that rises to 84% when including those that somewhat agree. An even higher percentage, 61%, strongly agreed with the notion that "Christianity is under attack in American today," which also rises to 84% when including people who somewhat agree.

Meanwhile, Biden voters largely disagreed. On both counts, only 38% of Biden voters strongly or somewhat agreed that anti-white discrimination is a problem and that Christianity is under attack. 91% of Democrats strongly or somewhat agreed that "system racism in America is a real and serious problem."

Further polling conducted by the group revealed just how tied to immigration Trump voter's concerns were; upwards of 80% of them strongly or somewhat agreed that they were worried about paying higher taxes due to illegal immigrants using healthcare, welfare, and education resources. A similar percentage were strongly or somewhat in agreement with the notion that they would "suffer personally" from the US being more socialist as a result of immigration.

"Trump voters are deeply and personally animated by a strong anti-immigration sentiment that unites their thinking across previously distinct and separate policy areas," the report observes....

An accurate and easily grasped concept of why those 84% believe what they believe can be gleaned from "We Need New Stories: The Myths that Subvert Freedom" by Nesrine Malik. It's a good explanation of how the gullible are enticed into voting against their own interest. But of course, none of them will read it.

[O Really]

I don't know that I would have answered those particular questions with "I agree", but I can certainly see why some groups would do so. It's hard to explain to even some educated people how it is that giving any preference at all for minorities doesn't discriminate against white people. And Christianity of some types is "under attack", but mostly that type that engages in pedophilia or does other stuff not in keeping with the normal mores of society.