A Nutjob A Day

[bannination]

http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/p ... f-the-usa/

Interestingly, the nutjobs are now taking the position of the ACLU now. At least this is good news. Perhaps they'll contribute. (More likely they don't realize that they are taking a Democrat position on the 4th.)

http://www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/us-v-jones

Too bad they're too chicken shit to discuss it.

[Bungalow Bill]

That's why, as the CPF has it, this country is dying--we've forgotten those good ole
Judean values. There was another funny post in Obama is a Muslim one (they never
give up on the stupid) that said Obama had never sat through a church service, coming
from the same nuts who had him sitting through twenty years at Wright's church. But
Chariman S. outdoes himself again.:

In other words, libs hate what obamby has done to the country but aren't smart enough
to either understand the failure or articulate their point, so they will simply fall in line with
being told to vote Hilary.

Truth is, the country is sick of liberalism and waiting for the chance to drive a stake through
it's heart come midterm.

I thought in S.'s world Obama and liberals are both Marxists, so why would one hate what
the other does? And why didn't the country drive a stake through liberalism's heart in November?
There's no nut like a wingnut.

[Bungalow Bill]

One of the nutjobs posted a press release from Sen. Ted Cruz about how Obama is
trying to massively extend federal power and Cruz lists six Supreme Court cases where
the court unanimously decided against the U.S. Naturally the usual nutters joined in
about how Obama is a dictator, blah, blah, blah. Turns out of the six cases, five began
before Obama took office. I can understand the nutjobs being stupid enough not to bother
to check this out, but a U.S. Senator also being that stupid? Guess so.

[O Really]

..., but a U.S. Senator also being that stupid? Guess so.

You are, after all, talking about Cruz.

[Bungalow Bill]

And Cruz has an impressive background in the law and he just lets his right wing
nuttiness blind him to the facts. Not really surprised, but still pretty pathetic.

It only took one reply for the wingnuts to bring Obama into the Boston Marathon
explosions.:

They're reporting casualties.

They're also reporting another unexploded device at the hotel.

Obama's friends? This administration will surely take advantage of it--
"Never let a good crisis go to waste."

[rstrong]

It only took one reply for the wingnuts to bring Obama into the Boston Marathon
explosions.:

Apparently it only took Alex Jones a few minutes to declare the bombings a "false flag" operation, carried out by the FBI. His followers are "wondering whether the bombings took place" and are already declaring the victims to be actors.

[Stinger]

Your ledge is really making up for lost time. You're getting some national press.

[Stinger]

North Carolina's going to have to work extra hard to out-stupid your neighbors to the west.

[bannination]

It will be blamed on the constitutional / patriot movement right out of the gate.

Then they will actually look for evidence and find something totally different.

Just like the DA killings.

-----

Never forget that Obama's buddy, Bill Ayers ADMITTED to doing this sort of bombing but for reasons I don't remember, he never served time for his crimes.

[Bungalow Bill]

Not that it makes much difference which wingnut it was, because they are, for the most
part, pretty much the same, but it was Yawn. I get a kick out of that name, as in yawn,
we've heard all this nuttiness before.

Now he's mananged to get Obama's "buddy," Bill Ayers into the mix. One of the reasons
was the FBI used illegal tactics to obtain evidence.:


Never forget that Obama's buddy, Bill Ayers ADMITTED to doing this sort of
bombing but for reasons I don't remember, he never served time for his crimes.

[rstrong]

Obama's "buddy," Bill Ayers

The lead federal prosecutor of the Weathermen in the 1970s points out just how sleazy and dishonest that smear is:

Prosecuting Weathermen

[Stinger]

Obama's "buddy," Bill Ayers

The lead federal prosecutor of the Weathermen in the 1970s points out just how sleazy and dishonest that smear is:

Prosecuting Weathermen

You know that, and I know that, and all the rational people know that, but the wingnuts will never get there.

I used to love how they always used the word "unrepentant" right before "terrorist" when discussing Bill Ayers. Usually followed by the word "ilk" somewhere down the line.

I guess it wasn't one of Butt Ugly's "original thoughts" if they were all using the same exact vocabulary.

[bannination]

Somehow I totally missed this thread. A college student(?) needing help with a speech.

http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/p ... -questions!/

As the title says... I have a speech due tomorrow and need some questions answered on a STRONG REPUBLICAN view! So here are the questions:

TOPIC: Government Run Healthcare-

1.) What does the plan entail?
2.) What plans do we have right now?
3.) Who does this affect?
4.) What is the opinion of the majority?

==============================================================================

Please help AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!!! thanks

Answers:

Wow!! Today at 21:47:50 and your just now asking for help.

#1 You have to vote for it so you can see what's in it.

#2 I have my own plan that I pay for myself.

3. Who does what effect?

4. Most of us are Conservatives.


Homework = Responsibility!

----

You obviously have a computer with access to the Internet. I suggest you do your own research.

----

As I recall, NONE of these questions were adequately addressed, much less answered, before the bill became law. After three years, it should be ever so plain, shouldn't it?

----

As far as opinions go, this forum has went into great detail on each of the questions that you posed. Just look at your questions and scour the topics that have been discussed by all of the conservatives here and I have no doubt that you'll find topics that have dicussed your questions. A word of caution though, speeches have a bad rep sometimes that are compiled in the manner that you are suggesting. Wouldn't it be better if you used your own data? Too many times already the audiences at such events are bored with repititious data, same ole' stuff-just a different mouth spewing it. Sink or swim, I'd go with originality. IMHO

What a riot!

[Ombudsman]

If there was ever any doubt that forum is nothing but a collection of idiots and lunatics, the thread on the Boston bombing provides overwhelming evidence.

[Boatrocker]

If there was ever any doubt that forum is nothing but a collection of idiots and lunatics, the thread on the Boston bombing provides overwhelming evidence.

Unfortunately, similar topics on a variety of forums have re-energized the conspiracy-addled rightwingnutosphere. It's all a great, big ol' plot by that moozlum Kenyan presy-dent and his minions in the FBI and FEMA and all them-there agencies without no names- you know, the ones with them black helicopters and missile-farrin' drone thingies and jackboots and shit.

[Bungalow Bill]

Not much doubt they're a collection of loony tunes. The detector they lack is a little common
sense. Most people have it to some degree, the nutjobs never did. Another good one from
Chariman S. and his bizarro world. These idiots talking about an agenda of truth. Hilarious.:



And somehow you miraculously have a "real news" detector the rest of us dumb asses don't have?

I'm guessing your critical thinking gene has been over ridden by your conspiracy gene and everyone
with an suspected agenda is out to trick you. We have an agenda here as well, it's called getting the
truth out, and had you been paying attention, we now have a Marxist in the House, Hell bent on destroying the American culture.

Wait until you get out of college and see the real world before you come to any conclusions on your
own, it's really not that bad, more than half the country are still decent folk.

[O Really]

Another Republican works on getting the female vote by referring to them as "vaginas." Yes, he did.
http://now.msn.com/peter-hansen-new-ham ... mass-email

[Boatrocker]

Another Republican works on getting the female vote by referring to them as "vaginas." Yes, he did.
http://now.msn.com/peter-hansen-new-ham ... mass-email

Another stupid old asshole. If minimum age limits are appropriate for holding office, then maximum age limits are equally reasonable. It won't keep out all the nutjobs, but it will take care of old shits like this. And McConnell. And McCain. And Byrd. And Helms. And . . . .

[Boatrocker]

Hillary Rodham Clinton will be his age in 2017.

Whatever issues/baggage she may be burdened with, being raised an arrogant asshole, who believes in the natural dominance and superiority of the male gender probably ain't one of them. But if she were subject to a maximum age, then so be it.

[Stinger]

Another Republican works on getting the female vote by referring to them as "vaginas." Yes, he did.
http://now.msn.com/peter-hansen-new-ham ... mass-email

To be fair, everyone calls him "Peter".

Only to his face. Behind his back, they call him "That Fucking Dick."