No more KoolAid wrote:
Only a matter of time before Banni's head gets to big it's already started but you have drank so much KoolAid it's flooded your brain. He has already tried to limit posters, one by trying to make you log in or join to start a thread. Now he is saying he may make it so you have to log in just to even answer a post. He's giving ya a taste of the KoolAid and you are lapping it up like a rabid dog. This is the liberal mantra, a little here a little there, they YOU swallow.
You're a complete idiot that doesn't know how the internet works.
Why are you so scared to log in? Don't want to lies equated with a user name? I don't blame you, Big Ugly.
Bungalow Bill wrote:
Not exactly the hardest thing to do. Leo is back with the Who Am I? Hitler/Obama thing, which
one of the nutjobs posted a while back at the dumb and dumber run BRN forum. Of course the
factual history of Hitler is all screwed up, as you might guess with a nutter email. Hitler was born
and raised in Austria, his father was born in Austria, and the father didn't desert the family, he
died when Hitler was thirteen. Those are just a few of the screw-ups. Anybody who really thinks there
are some deep similarities between the two has already shown he is a typical dumbass ill-informed
nutjob (sorry for the redundancies).
That post must have really hit you hard didn't it? Did I hurt your feelings or something? I thought the piece was funny and I posted it just to see the humorous comments it would illicit; however I wasn't prepared for the rabid stupidity as in your comments. You really ought to get a life; this Obama obsession is going to make you wormy. Oh wait...I forgot! This is the playground of the libs!
Silly me.
I guess it would have been funny if you had stated it was sarcasm or something. As it was it just looked like a really screwed up version of Hitler history.
Big Ugly says there are two answers.... he just doesn't know what they are..... typical Big Ugly.
Another in a long series of nutjob factually screwed-up posts hitting anybody hard?
Yep, about as hard as dog bites man. It's the same old wingnut ploy. Post some
nonsensical garbage from an email or net, somebody comes along and shows how
stupid it is and then pretend it was a joke. That's been SOP for every nutjob over on
the dumb and dumber run forum for who knows how long. If the comments were so
stupid, why don't you go back and point out where I was wrong? Because you're just
another nutjob nitwit, who, for whatever reason, likes to demonstrate repeatedly
how clueless your are. Whatever.
Up there above No more Koolaid whines about having to log in on here to respond to a post....hilarious....you have to log in at the D & D forum to respond to a post there. Why would it be any different anywhere else?
DooHickey wrote:Thanks, Banni. The underlined, bold parts of the agreement was the thorny part I didn't care for.
Why did you leave [img], [flash], and smilies OFF? Control fever getting to you?
Are you becoming a NASCAR fan?
"You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any other material that may violate any laws be it of your country, the country where “NO CENSORSHIP!!†is hosted or International Law. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed required by us.
The IP address of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions.
You agree that “NO CENSORSHIP!!†have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should we see fit.
As a user you agree to any information you have entered to being stored in a database.
While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent, neither “NO CENSORSHIP!!†nor phpBB shall be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised. "
Translation: You post kiddie porn and of course I have to delete it. Notice, it doesn't say you can't post hateful messages, it says you can't post hateful message that violate laws.
It's an anonymous forum. Who's whining about posting under a pseudonym?
Don't forget that if someone slanders a person by name, that person can sue and acquire the actual names of an anonymous forum.
If you "slander" an anonymous forum persona, that's not slander. No legal repercussions.
And, if you say the truth about someone -- e.g. "Big Ugly's a frickin' dumbass" -- there won't be any comebacks at all.
Leo L wrote:
That post must have really hit you hard didn't it? Did I hurt your feelings or something? I thought the piece was funny and I posted it just to see the humorous comments it would illicit; however I wasn't prepared for the rabid stupidity as in your comments.
Definition of ILLICIT
: not permitted : unlawful
Definition of ELICIT
1
: to draw forth or bring out (something latent or potential) <hypnotism elicited his hidden fears>
2
: to call forth or draw out (as information or a response) <her remarks elicited cheers>
From the guy who takes great delight in ridiculing others over typos and such. Just like Mr. X.
I guess it's a good thing for you that "rabid stupidity" isn't "elicit," or you'd be arrested.
You really ought to get a life; this Obama obsession is going to make you wormy.
I would thing the person who is unhinged enough to make an Obama/Hitler comparison is the one with the obsession who really ought to get a life. Normal, rational people wouldn't make such posts.
Leo L wrote:
That post must have really hit you hard didn't it? Did I hurt your feelings or something? I thought the piece was funny and I posted it just to see the humorous comments it would illicit; however I wasn't prepared for the rabid stupidity as in your comments.
Definition of ILLICIT
: not permitted : unlawful
Definition of ELICIT
1
: to draw forth or bring out (something latent or potential) <hypnotism elicited his hidden fears>
2
: to call forth or draw out (as information or a response) <her remarks elicited cheers>
From the guy who takes great delight in ridiculing others over typos and such. Just like Mr. X.
I guess it's a good thing for you that "rabid stupidity" isn't "elicit," or you'd be arrested.
"Opps!" Blew that one!
Stinger wrote:I would thing (You would?) the person who is unhinged enough to make an Obama/Hitler comparison is the one with the obsession who really ought to get a life. Normal, rational people wouldn't make such posts.
That's what you get for "thinging". Life's a real bitch, ain't it?
[u]Bungalow Bill[/u] wrote:Another in a long series of nutjob factually screwed-up posts hitting anybody hard?
Yep, about as hard as dog bites man. It's the same old wingnut ploy. Post some nonsensical garbage from an email or net, somebody comes along and shows how stupid it is and then pretend it was a joke. That's been SOP for every nutjob over on
the dumb and dumber run forum for who knows how long.
It did hurt your feelings! Dammit Bunghole, I'm sorry, Pal; I didn't realize you'd take it so hard.
(no pun intended) Now the nutjobs have their own forum to ply their SOP. Got it.
If the comments were so stupid, why don't you go back and point out where I was wrong?
I didn't say that anything you said was wrong. I was referring to your getting your ass in a
twist over a stupid email that likened your hero to another one of history's weirdos.
Because you're just another nutjob nitwit, who, for whatever reason, likes to demonstrate repeatedly
how clueless your are. Whatever.
So your "strategy" is to post nonsensical email stuff that either you realize is full of errors
or that you are too ignorant to realize is full of errors and then when someone corrects it,
say their feelings are hurt, and then show how dumb you are all over again? Dude, that
just ain't a winner for you. Neither is the old nutjob ploy that somehow people are getting their
ass in a twist when they show how stupid you are. Hell, this is like shooting fish in a teacup.
Wingnuts=Hilarious.
The nutjobs have always had their own forum. It's the d & d run one over on BRN, the one run
by the two narrow-minded nanny staters. Why not post one nasty post, without curse words
just to make it fair, here and on the BRN forum and see where it is deleted first.
Liberal? No, you'll always be the same old, same old clueless right-wing nut job. Just like stupid,
it can't be fixed.
Bungalow Bill wrote:
The nutjobs have always had their own forum. It's the d & d run one over on BRN, the one run
by the two narrow-minded nanny staters. I know now, thanks for clearing it up; the nutjobs couldn't hack it over there, so they started their own personal forum here. Bless your heart. I totally understand now. Forgive me, please; I was unaware I was mingling with mental incompetents.
Why not post one nasty post, without curse words
just to make it fair, here and on the BRN forum and see where it is deleted first. Nope. Not stooping to your level; thanks for the offer though.
We'll leave that action where it's more at home.
Liberal? No, you'll always be the same old, same old clueless right-wing nut job.
Just like stupid, it can't be fixed. Firstly, I'm not a right-wing nor a left-wing; clueless sometimes, yes.
You've already proven, as a liberal blank, that you can't fix stupid.
Every time you see yourself in a mirror, you're mingling with a mental incompetent. It had nothing
to do with no being able to hack it. Nutters like yourself are just as clueless as you were six months
ago. Folks just got tired of the two narrow-minded assholes who were running the site and keeping
"free speech" to a minimum. That's why this site is a whole lot better. And that's the reason you wouldn't
dare post an identical mildly offensive post on each site, because you know the two assholes over on
BRN would delete it in a minute, but not here. That would be one way to clearly show the difference,
but nutjobbers don't like real world evidence when they have their loony tunes emails to rely on.
Hilarious.
Hee hee, disclaimer. So after you outed yourself as a complete shithead, it's disclaimer
time. And yet the other nutters still don't get it and are taking it seriously. And you're
still talking about history repeating itself, even after you realize it's a bunch of bull.
The only history that is repeating itself is yours of being a complete fucking idiot. It is
entertaining, that's for sure. Wingnuts usually are. My favorite is His father deserted
him. Yeah, Hitler's father deserted him by dying when Hitler was thirteen. The nerve of
that guy. Wingnuts, more fun than a barrel of monkeys, though not quite as bright.
Your intelligence...I mean lack of intelligence is showing. Liberal wingnuts, like yourself, are like the low-lifes who walk around with their pants down around their ankles; you know two big words. The first begins with an 'F', and the other has mother in front of it. Otherwise, just like a butt-sniffing liberal you are, anyone who you disagree with gets a cussing.
I'm expecting either of your clones to chime in next.
Yep, real intelligence you're showing there, Billy Bob.
Leo L wrote:Your intelligence...I mean lack of intelligence is showing. Liberal wingnuts, like yourself, are like the low-lifes who walk around with their pants down around their ankles; you know two big words. The first begins with an 'F', and the other has mother in front of it. Otherwise, just like a butt-sniffing liberal you are, anyone who you disagree with gets a cussing.
I'm expecting either of your clones to chime in next.
Yep, real intelligence you're showing there, Billy Bob.
I'm adult enough to handle an occasional profanity. I'm more offended by the utterly stupid and egregiously dishonest -- i.e. the wingnut Kool Aid shit you post. You whine about word choice and promote dishonesty and ignorance. Great choices.
Leo L wrote:Your intelligence...I mean lack of intelligence is showing. Liberal wingnuts, like yourself, are like the low-lifes who walk around with their pants down around their ankles; you know two big words. The first begins with an 'F', and the other has mother in front of it. Otherwise, just like a butt-sniffing liberal you are, anyone who you disagree with gets a cussing.
I'm expecting either of your clones to chime in next.
Yep, real intelligence you're showing there, Billy Bob.
I'm adult enough to handle an occasional profanity. I'm more offended by the utterly stupid and egregiously dishonest -- i.e. the wingnut Kool Aid shit you post. You whine about word choice and promote dishonesty and ignorance. Great choices.
"I'm expecting either of your clones to chime in next."......
Leo L wrote:Your intelligence...I mean lack of intelligence is showing. Liberal wingnuts, like yourself, are like the low-lifes who walk around with their pants down around their ankles; you know two big words. The first begins with an 'F', and the other has mother in front of it. Otherwise, just like a butt-sniffing liberal you are, anyone who you disagree with gets a cussing.
I'm expecting either of your clones to chime in next.
Yep, real intelligence you're showing there, Billy Bob.
I'm adult enough to handle an occasional profanity. I'm more offended by the utterly stupid and egregiously dishonest -- i.e. the wingnut Kool Aid shit you post. You whine about word choice and promote dishonesty and ignorance. Great choices.
"I'm expecting either of your clones to chime in next."......
It's a forum where multiple people post. That's kind of like predicting the sun will rise tomorrow. Or the unemployment rate will go below 8% after 31 straight months of private-sector job growth.
I don't know of any correlation between intelligence and using curse words. Motherfucker is as
American as cherry pie. Sorry there no clones here. Everybody gives their individual opinion.
I just got a tremendous kick out of the nonsensical efforts to link Hitler with Obama, just because
(leaving aside the history howlers) they share a few insignificant characteristics that could apply
to any number of pols. It's just another example of the absolute delusional character of your typical
nutjob.
Hitler ran against an old white guy for president and lost.
Obama ran against an old white guy for president and won.
The moron would be Leo L., who posted it over on the BRN forum under the thread title
Who Am I? He used the old nutter switcheroo: when someone pointed out that it was
full of historical errors, it all of a sudden became a joke posted for "entertainment" purposes.
Got it. The same messed up email was posted by someone a fairly long time ago. The nutters
can't even come up with new loony tunes, they just keep repeating the same old ones.
That would be r.j.'s MO, posting wingnuttery, then saying he did it for fun, to get the liberals riled.
His chit post is still intact, though buried on page 3.
A bit of profanity is no big deal. Obviously, however, damn is enough to get you banned over at BRN, but lies and lack of accountability are inconsequential. The 3 Little Sexist Pigs are immune from censure, much less censorship. Its quite alright to impugn sexually active women, even if they're married. Calling mthomemama a spoiled brat doesn't fit their definition of "disparaging" comments.
And Fogle, who thinks of himself as a humorist, is the biggest impugner of them all.
