I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Stinger »

Wait. I surrender. I do believe. I do believe.

I believe that you watched the forum for six months before you posted anything because you're just such a shy, reticent, non-confrontational person with no opinions on any state or national issues. It makes so much sense.

I believe that you observed the whole troll infestation (though still not smart enough to figure out that the mod -- with all the information you didn't have -- figured it out and booted the troll but left me) and then watched the forum for more than six months before you posted anything. That's eminently logical and explains your vast knowledge of the troll infestation. And, it's just so . . . you.

I believe that you sat and watched as the stimulating topic of a sheriff's assault vehicle in a county you don't live played out right before your very eyes and overstimulated your mind so much that, three months later, when you finally worked up the nerve to make a comment, you made it about the sheriff's assault vehicle. It just makes so much sense. How could anyone doubt a story like that? I feel so silly.

I can see you going back and reading that thread every night, typing up little drafts of a response, trying to work up the nerve to make your first post about a sheriff's assault vehicle in a county you don't live in. What a cathartic breakthrough it must have been when you finally could bring yourself to make that first comment.

Yes, I am gullible enough to believe all of that. That's why I chug all that far-right extremist Kool Aid and believe Obama was born in Kenya, etc., etc.

Dumbass.

User avatar
Leo Lyons
Ensign
Posts: 1787
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Leo Lyons »

Stinger wrote:Wait. I surrender. I do believe. I do believe.
Yes, I am gullible enough to believe all of that.
That's why I chug all that far-right extremist Kool Aid and believe Obama was born in Kenya, etc., etc.
Image Image Image Image Image Image

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Stinger »

Wait. I surrender. I do believe. I do believe.

I believe that you watched the forum for six months before you posted anything because you're just such a shy, reticent, non-confrontational person with no opinions on any state or national issues. It makes so much sense.

I believe that you observed the whole troll infestation (though still not smart enough to figure out that the mod -- with all the information you didn't have -- figured it out and booted the troll but left me) and then watched the forum for more than six months before you posted anything. That's eminently logical and explains your vast knowledge of the troll infestation. And, it's just so . . . you.

I believe that you sat and watched as the stimulating topic of a sheriff's assault vehicle in a county you don't live played out right before your very eyes and overstimulated your mind so much that, three months later, when you finally worked up the nerve to make a comment, you made it about the sheriff's assault vehicle. It just makes so much sense. How could anyone doubt a story like that? I feel so silly.

I can see you going back and reading that thread every night, typing up little drafts of a response, trying to work up the nerve to make your first post about a sheriff's assault vehicle in a county you don't live in. What a cathartic breakthrough it must have been when you finally could bring yourself to make that first comment.

Yes, I am gullible enough to believe all of that. That's why I chug all that far-right extremist Kool Aid and believe Obama was born in Kenya, etc., etc.

Dumbass.

User avatar
Leo Lyons
Ensign
Posts: 1787
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Leo Lyons »

Stinger wrote:Wait. I surrender. I do believe. I do believe.
Yes, I am gullible enough to believe all of that.
That's why I chug all that far-right extremist Kool Aid and believe Obama was born in Kenya, etc., etc.
Image Image Image Image Image Image

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Stinger »

Leo Lyons wrote:
Stinger wrote:Wait. I surrender. I do believe. I do believe.
Yes, I am gullible enough to believe all of that.
That's why I chug all that far-right extremist Kool Aid and believe Obama was born in Kenya, etc., etc.
Image Image Image Image Image Image
Leo's just like my toilet -- full of shit and just keeps running and running and running ....

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5592
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by bannination »

LOL good lord children.

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Stinger »

I just think it's funny watching Leo try to pretend that his answers make the slightest bit of sense.

Okay, I'll settle it once and for all. I really, really do believe Leo's fairy tales. I do believe.

I believe that he watched the forum for six months before he posted anything, as he has stated, because he's proven to be such a shy, reticent, non-confrontational person with no opinions on any state or national issues. It makes so much sense.

I believe that he observed the whole troll infestation (though he's still not smart enough to figure out that the mod -- with all the information he didn't have -- figured it out and booted the troll but left me) and then watched the forum for more than six months before he posted anything. That's eminently logical and explains his vast knowledge of the troll infestation. And, it's just so . . . Leo.

I believe that he sat and watched as the stimulating topic of a sheriff's assault vehicle in a county he didn't live in played out right before his very eyes and overstimulated his mind so much that, three months later, when he finally worked up the nerve to make a comment, he made it about the sheriff's assault vehicle. It just makes so much sense. How could anyone doubt a story like that? I feel so silly.

I can see him going back to that thread, night after night, typing up little drafts of a response, trying to work up the nerve to make his first post about a sheriff's assault vehicle in a county he didn't live in. What a cathartic breakthrough it must have been when he finally could bring himself to make that first comment.

Yes, I believe Leo's entire story. It passes every sniff test I can come up with.

But I'm sure going to miss his little impotent protestations ... and his threats to beat me up in a nonexistent dojo that his imaginary friend owns.

You guys take all the fun out of a forum.

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5592
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by bannination »

Vrede wrote:
bannination wrote:...good lord...
Huh? ;)
Nothing wrong with a figure of speech! :mrgreen:

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Stinger »

bannination wrote:
Vrede wrote:
bannination wrote:...good lord...
Huh? ;)
Nothing wrong with a figure of speech! :mrgreen:
I use those figures of speech all the time.

Biggest problem for atheist sticklers -- what do you say when you have an orgasm? "Oh, Flying Spaghetti Monster?"

User avatar
Leo Lyons
Ensign
Posts: 1787
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Leo Lyons »

Stinger wrote: Leo's just like my toilet-- full of shit and just keeps running and running and running ....
Your toilet has to get it's load from somewhere doesn't it; it doesn't fill itself.

Takes a load to make a load.
Stinger wrote:I believe that he watched the forum for six months before he posted anything,
There's that echo again.

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Stinger »

Leo Lyons wrote:
Stinger wrote: Leo's just like my toilet-- full of shit and just keeps running and running and running ....
Your toilet has to get it's load from somewhere doesn't it; it doesn't fill itself.

Takes a load to make a load.

I know where my toilet gets the shit that it's full of. Don't know where you get yours. Don't want to. Just stating the facts.
Stinger wrote:I believe that he watched the forum for six months before he posted anything,
There's that echo again.
That's your story, and you're sticking to it ... er, running from it.

Sounds vaguely reminiscent of something country.

I already confessed that I buy the whole story. You read the forum for six months before you ever posted anything. You were so fascinated by the sheriff's assault vehicle that you finally worked up the nerve to post about it ... over three months after it died. No problems with the sniff test on any of that. What more do you want?

User avatar
Leo Lyons
Ensign
Posts: 1787
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Leo Lyons »

[b][i]Stinger the Echo[/i][/b] wrote:I know where my toilet gets the shit that it's full of. No problems with the sniff test on any of that. Image

Not nary a doubt in my mind. Glad to see your such great friends with your poot pot. Like I said; it takes a load to make a load. Image

What more do you want?
I never asked for anything to begin with, however, you should be thanking me. I must be of great therapeutic value to you;
you know, a friendly shoulder to cry on, vent your frustrations, etc. So you just go on with your childish tirade; we're here for you Ol' Buddy....cuss, spew, slobber, and rage on. We're here to pat you on the back and tell you all's OK...
Image

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Stinger »

[quote="Leo Lyons"] We're here to pat you on the back and tell you all's OK[/img]

Gee, that's exactly what I'm doing for you. All that whining and playing the victim card because people doubted your totally-believable story ... why, it was just a few pages back. Poor wittle Weo compwaining about those big, bad posters picking on him for no reason. As Thorn would misspell it, "Wha, wha, wha." I'm just telling you that we all believe it now, and you can stop all the whining and playing the victim card.

And if you want to just sit and read the forum another six months before you post, go right ahead. I hope you find another topic as interesting as sheriff's assault vehicles when you come out of hibernation.

User avatar
Guest
Red Shirt
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:43 am

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Guest »

Stinger wrote:
Leo Lyons wrote: We're here to pat you on the back and tell you all's OK[/img]

Gee, that's exactly what I'm doing for you. All that whining and playing the victim card because people doubted your totally-believable story ... why, it was just a few pages back. Poor wittle Weo compwaining about those big, bad posters picking on him for no reason. As Thorn would misspell it, "Wha, wha, wha." I'm just telling you that we all believe it now, and you can stop all the whining and playing the victim card.

And if you want to just sit and read the forum another six months before you post, go right ahead. I hope you find another topic as interesting as sheriff's assault vehicles when you come out of hibernation.
Good god, what a pair of whiney asses. You two should create your own little playground....Oh, wait though... :shock:

User avatar
Leo Lyons
Ensign
Posts: 1787
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Leo Lyons »

Vrede wrote:They tell me the make-up sex is amazing!
You'd probably want to watch.

User avatar
Leo Lyons
Ensign
Posts: 1787
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Leo Lyons »

Leo Lyons wrote: Your "troll infestation" wasn't exactly secret, lamebrain, every time you posted, your supposed "dopplegangers" would repeat your post
and you would whine and spew about it until you got your wet nurse's attention....I mean geeze, get real.

Now let's consider this for a moment: In the BRN forums, someone couldn't come along and use the same avatar that someone else was already using, so it stands to reason that you were your own troll. You would copy & paste your post and change the screen name to Winger, Banger, or Dingalinger or some far out shit like that, them piss and moan that you had a troll following you around.
:wtf: :roll:
Wow! This woman's been reading the blueridgedebate.com debacles; she took some pages from Stinger's book! :lol: :wtf:
It's a weird world out there in fantasyland! :lol: Geeze Stinger, maybe you had a boyfriend??
Woman used Facebook to harass herself

05/05/2013
KENT COUNTY, Mich. - A Michigan woman faces criminal charges after police say she used Facebook to harass herself.

According to police, Cheryl Nelson, 52, admitted to creating Facebook accounts using her ex-boyfriend’s personal information
to make it look like his new girlfriend was harassing her.

Nelson reported that she had been the victim of stalking, harassment, assault and home invasion.

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Stinger »

Still too stupid to figure it out. That's our wittle Weo. That's okay. The mod did (having access to IP addresses, e-mail addresses, etc., dumbs), and so did everyone else with two or more working brain cells.

You're not even smart enough to figure out how stupid you look harping on something everyone else figured out long ago.

Maybe you should hibernate for six months and work up enough courage to post about the sheriff's assault vehicle.

User avatar
Stinger
Sub-Lieutenant
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Stinger »

Leo Lyons wrote:
Leo Lyons wrote: Your "troll infestation" wasn't exactly secret, lamebrain, every time you posted, your supposed "dopplegangers" would repeat your post and you would whine and spew about it until you got your wet nurse's attention....I mean geeze, get real.
And how would you know, dumbass?

I believe that you either

A) read those posts, got all excited, and obsessed about them the entire six months you waited until you worked up the nerve to make your first post

or

B) went back through 80 or so pages, thousands upon thousands upon thousands of threads, and read up on all the different threads where the troll posted ... because that old forum was just so frickin' interesting.

I really do believe your story, . . . but I'd love to hear you tell it one more time.

Always cracks me up.

User avatar
Leo Lyons
Ensign
Posts: 1787
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am

Re: I support background checks, wait, no, no I don't.

Unread post by Leo Lyons »

There's that echo again, again, again, again ))))))

We've always known you were cracked.....Image

Post Reply