Gun Legislation

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23182
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by O Really »

Mad American wrote:.other than my original statement that you can't be arrested for stupid -0-?
Yeah, except that you can. It happens all the time. Happened at least twice yesterday down here in Spring Break Land. They don't put "Being Stupid" on the charge documents, of course, but it's fundamental stupidity that results in some actual infraction. Most of those are actually way less "stupid" than not properly clearing a firearm and pointing it away from people.

Mad American
Flight Lieutenant
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:46 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Mad American »

Vrede wrote:Misleading? I lived out West for 30 years and I know what instate hunters think of out of state hunters. CO has a huge tourist economy, the impact will likely be negligible except for isolated businesses. You folks are free to snit all you want, most Coloradans won't miss you a bit.
Yes, misleading. Your article does not mention what Colorado resident hunters think of non resident hunters at all. It is directed at the potential economic impact for the most part but it is still a good read. You are correct the impact to the entire state may be minimal. As long as Vale, Aspen, Copper, Breckenridge and all the other ski towns stay open the state's tourism will not suffer. However, individual towns like Newcastle, and Meeker will suffer on the local level if out of state hunters go elsewhere.

Mad American
Flight Lieutenant
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:46 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Mad American »

O Really wrote:
Mad American wrote:.other than my original statement that you can't be arrested for stupid -0-?
Yeah, except that you can. It happens all the time. Happened at least twice yesterday down here in Spring Break Land. They don't put "Being Stupid" on the charge documents, of course, but it's fundamental stupidity that results in some actual infraction. Most of those are actually way less "stupid" than not properly clearing a firearm and pointing it away from people.
Again.....I DO NOT KNOW why criminal charges are rarely brought....ask a prosecuting attorney! Why do you continue to beat the dead horse?

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23182
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by O Really »

Mad American wrote:. However, individual towns like Newcastle, and Meeker will suffer on the local level if out of state hunters go elsewhere.
Probably so, but don't other events/changes cause some locations or businesses to suffer and some to prosper? Building the interstates wiped out a lot of roadside businesses. Sad, but that doesn't mean it was a bad decision to build the road.

User avatar
GoCubsGo
Admiral
Posts: 21722
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:22 am

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by GoCubsGo »

Maybe they should go to Pennsylvania...


Hunter shoots deer at Walmart



http://www.upi.com/blog/2013/03/27/Hunt ... 364407417/
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000 000101 010202 020303 010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.


Foxtrot
Delta
Tango

User avatar
Crock Hunter
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:40 pm
Location: THIS USER IS BANNED

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Crock Hunter »

Mad American wrote:You didn't explain jack shit idiot.
Of course he did... It seems everyone understood Ombudsman but you. .. . This and you repeating the Federal law that I posted as though no one here had read it.. I'm beginning to get a sense of just how poor your reading comprehension is.. .. .. .
`~~~:< .. Welcome to the Swamp.. .. Swim Fast..

Mad American
Flight Lieutenant
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:46 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Mad American »

Crock Hunter wrote:Of course he did... It seems everyone understood Ombudsman but you. .. . This and you repeating the Federal law that I posted as though no one here had read it.. I'm beginning to get a sense of just how poor your reading comprehension is.. .. .. .
Really? My apologies, I'll dumb it on down for you so it won't be so difficult for you to understand. I forgot that most of you here have difficulty over the 2nd grade level.

User avatar
Ombudsman
Ensign
Posts: 1268
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Ombudsman »

Mad American wrote:
Ombudsman wrote:Sally, Sugar, Sweetie, do you still not comprehend that I was the first person to explain this to you? Yes O Really was more patient in walking you through it, step by baby step but he was just drawing you a picture of what I already said. I'm sorry I took a break and ran to Publix while he laid it out for you. I'd have done the same although my responses would have involved a lot more references to what a dip shit you are, but he beat me to it. It's good for you that people are more patient than I am with backwoods bumpkins but are you still so confused that you can't understand my original post?

You didn't explain jack shit idiot. You were proven a moron on federal gun law, ran off, waited, and then when vrede and o'really jumped in the conversation you popped out from under the porch yapping like an ankle biting dog. Just like the little ankle biting bitch you are, you got punted like a football. Crawl back under your porch and lick yourself bitch....the adults are talking.

Stupid is a tough way to live huh?
I wouldn't know but you sure seem to be having a tough go of it
Its difficult communicating with someone as out of touch with reality as you appear to be but I didn't run off. You obviously sit here all day hitting the refresh button waiting for me to respond to one of your childish little taunts and then throw a hissy fit that I'm not hanging out all day with nothing to do. Sorry chump but you're going to have to beef up your act if you want me to pay you more attention.
Wing nuts. Not just for breakfast anymore.

User avatar
Ombudsman
Ensign
Posts: 1268
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Ombudsman »

In one of Freuds essays he discusses the appearance of weapons in a dream, in particular swords. He believed them to be phallic symbols and stated that fear of weapons in a dream by a woman meant fear of men. And it's not as if this a secret. Even gun manufacturers draw the connection and use it their marketing.

Image
Wing nuts. Not just for breakfast anymore.

User avatar
Crock Hunter
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:40 pm
Location: THIS USER IS BANNED

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Crock Hunter »

Mad American wrote:
Crock Hunter wrote:Of course he did... It seems everyone understood Ombudsman but you. .. . This and you repeating the Federal law that I posted as though no one here had read it.. I'm beginning to get a sense of just how poor your reading comprehension is.. .. .. .
Really? My apologies, I'll dumb it on down for you so it won't be so difficult for you to understand. I forgot that most of you here have difficulty over the 2nd grade level.

Damn.. that is likely the most non sequitur reply to a post of mine since DeLudicrous Sextus went off on his "Watts not Lumens" fulmination.. .. . but come to think of ..he was a gun nut too.. . brain damage from lead and gun powder exposure must be a chronic condition with you nitwits..

Please .. I don't expect you to be honest but at least you could be sentient when you post.. ..

Plus... don't worry about dumbing yourself down..(good job btw.) on your best day ever... you cannot talk over my head. it's a good 3 feet over your ass.... .
`~~~:< .. Welcome to the Swamp.. .. Swim Fast..

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23182
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by O Really »

Mad American wrote:
O Really wrote:
Mad American wrote:.other than my original statement that you can't be arrested for stupid -0-?
Yeah, except that you can. It happens all the time. Happened at least twice yesterday down here in Spring Break Land. They don't put "Being Stupid" on the charge documents, of course, but it's fundamental stupidity that results in some actual infraction. Most of those are actually way less "stupid" than not properly clearing a firearm and pointing it away from people.
Again.....I DO NOT KNOW why criminal charges are rarely brought....ask a prosecuting attorney! Why do you continue to beat the dead horse?
It's a rhetorical question, Mad. Lots of people, including yourself, express opinions on topics without actually KNOWING the answer.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23182
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by O Really »

They apparently bought all the weapons legally, along with the ammunition. They were apparently keeping it all legally. The police had no grounds to search their premises, and couldn't have done anything about their arsenal if they had. Even if everybody who knew Lanza thought he was a nut case, there is no provision to do anything with or about him. If he actually threatened no one, nor violated any law, there apparently wasn't anything anybody could have done to prevent his rampage. Just a regular ol' law-abiding NRA member who wants a bunch of "sporting" weapons just because he can, and whose "rights" to do so far outweigh the overall interests of the community and the hazards endured by the community.

Mad American
Flight Lieutenant
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:46 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Mad American »

Vrede wrote:
Newtown school gunman fired 154 rounds in less than 5 minutes

The gunman who killed 20 children and six adults at a Connecticut elementary school fired 154 rounds in less than 5 minutes, selecting high capacity magazines from a home arsenal stocked with swords, knives and a cache of guns, officials said.

Investigators also found a newspaper clipping about a mass shooting in the home that Adam Lanza shared with his mother, along with a gun safe in his bedroom, receipts from shooting ranges and National Rifle Association certificates for both of them, according to court papers released on Thursday.

To carry out the second deadliest school shooting in U.S. history, the 20-year-old Lanza used 30-round magazines...

"We now know that he left the lower capacity magazines at home," Malloy said in a statement. "This is exactly why we need to ban high capacity magazines and why we need to tighten our assault weapons ban."...

The searches showed that Lanza had many weapons besides the AR-15-type assault rifle and two handguns used in the December 14 attack...

The court papers said police searching the Lanza home found an Enfield Albian bolt-action rifle, a Savage Mark II rifle, a revolver...

The search also turned up a Saiga 12 shotgun and two magazines containing 70 rounds of ammunition in the car Lanza drove to the school.
3 rifles, a shotgun, 3 pistols, ten 30-round magazines for the AR-15, tons of ammo - all in the possession of just 2 law-abiding NRA members - 30+ rounds fired per minute, 26 kids and staff slaughtered.
Whats your point vrede. I've already proven over and over again that magazine swaps can be accomplished in seconds by the most inexperienced shooters...fractions of a second by proficient ones. Magazine size is irrelevant!

Mad American
Flight Lieutenant
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:46 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Mad American »

Crock Hunter wrote:Damn.. that is likely the most non sequitur reply to a post of mine since DeLudicrous Sextus went off on his "Watts not Lumens" fulmination.. .. . but come to think of ..he was a gun nut too.. . brain damage from lead and gun powder exposure must be a chronic condition with you nitwits..

Please .. I don't expect you to be honest but at least you could be sentient when you post.. ..

Plus... don't worry about dumbing yourself down..(good job btw.) on your best day ever... you cannot talk over my head. it's a good 3 feet over your ass.... .
You are not worth my best...I reserve that for people that have the ability to think. All I can say is you must be one tall SOB because for your head to be three feet over my ass when it is so firmly planted in your own is something. Now go catch some spring lizards and let the adults talk. Out!

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23182
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by O Really »

Mad American wrote: I've already proven over and over again that magazine swaps can be accomplished in seconds by the most inexperienced shooters...fractions of a second by proficient ones. Magazine size is irrelevant!
OK - I'll take your word for it. But if that's the case, why would anybody be negatively affected if they could only buy max 10?

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2066
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Boatrocker »

Mad American wrote:. . . Whats your point vrede. I've already proven over and over again that magazine swaps can be accomplished in seconds by the most inexperienced shooters...fractions of a second by proficient ones. Magazine size is irrelevant!
You have yet to prove one thing, beyond your dimness. And the emboldened portion of that idiotic post is absolute bullshit. Pure bullshit.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.

Mad American
Flight Lieutenant
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:46 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Mad American »

O Really wrote:
Mad American wrote: I've already proven over and over again that magazine swaps can be accomplished in seconds by the most inexperienced shooters...fractions of a second by proficient ones. Magazine size is irrelevant!
OK - I'll take your word for it. But if that's the case, why would anybody be negatively affected if they could only buy max 10?
They wouldn't. However, what happens the next time we have a mass shooting and the shooter used 6 ten round magazines instead of 2 thirties? Gonna cut them back to 5 rounds, then to 3, back to single shots.....where will it stop???

Mad American
Flight Lieutenant
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:46 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Mad American »

Boatrocker wrote:
Mad American wrote:. . . Whats your point vrede. I've already proven over and over again that magazine swaps can be accomplished in seconds by the most inexperienced shooters...fractions of a second by proficient ones. Magazine size is irrelevant!
You have yet to prove one thing, beyond your dimness. And the emboldened portion of that idiotic post is absolute bullshit. Pure bullshit.
So my statement that magazine swaps can be accomplished in fractions of a second by proficient ones (shooters) is bullshit? "Pure bullshit"???

Pay extra close attention from about the 3:50 mark on. Then I'll be accepting that apology.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8C-CLsMRcA0

Or maybe here if you like handguns:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X94nfgvP8Ks

Or here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAFxgQmxbGI

Is three enough or do you need more?? Like shooting fish in a barrel when a loudmouthed moron who is ignorant on a subject tries to make a point!!! :---P :oII

User avatar
Boatrocker
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 2066
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
Location: Southeast of Disorder

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Boatrocker »

Mad American wrote:
Boatrocker wrote:
Mad American wrote:. . . Whats your point vrede. I've already proven over and over again that magazine swaps can be accomplished in seconds by the most inexperienced shooters...fractions of a second by proficient ones. Magazine size is irrelevant!
You have yet to prove one thing, beyond your dimness. And the emboldened portion of that idiotic post is absolute bullshit. Pure bullshit.
So my statement that magazine swaps can be accomplished in fractions of a second by proficient ones (shooters) is bullshit? "Pure bullshit"???

Pay extra close attention from about the 3:50 mark on. Then I'll be accepting that apology.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8C-CLsMRcA0

Or maybe here if you like handguns:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X94nfgvP8Ks

Or here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAFxgQmxbGI

Is three enough or do you need more?? Like shooting fish in a barrel when a loudmouthed moron who is ignorant on a subject tries to make a point!!! :---P :oII
I don't apologize to lying teabagger white trash gun nuts. Fraction if a second? Hardly. Bullshit. Double bullshit. I love it when a dumb cracker pretends to be a small arms expert, but is so fucking stupid he falls for fake videos.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.

Mad American
Flight Lieutenant
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:46 pm

Re: Gun Legislation

Unread post by Mad American »

Boatrocker wrote:
Mad American wrote:
Boatrocker wrote:
Mad American wrote:. . . Whats your point vrede. I've already proven over and over again that magazine swaps can be accomplished in seconds by the most inexperienced shooters...fractions of a second by proficient ones. Magazine size is irrelevant!
You have yet to prove one thing, beyond your dimness. And the emboldened portion of that idiotic post is absolute bullshit. Pure bullshit.
So my statement that magazine swaps can be accomplished in fractions of a second by proficient ones (shooters) is bullshit? "Pure bullshit"???

Pay extra close attention from about the 3:50 mark on. Then I'll be accepting that apology.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8C-CLsMRcA0

Or maybe here if you like handguns:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X94nfgvP8Ks

Or here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAFxgQmxbGI

Is three enough or do you need more?? Like shooting fish in a barrel when a loudmouthed moron who is ignorant on a subject tries to make a point!!! :---P :oII
I don't apologize to lying teabagger white trash gun nuts. Fraction if a second? Hardly. Bullshit. Double bullshit.
Not only incurably stupid, but deaf and blind as well. Still doesn't negate the fact that those videos just proved you an ignorant loudmouthed ass...and then you doubled down on it :lol: :-H :lol: :-H Keep up the good work :clap:

Post Reply