Homos

[neoplacebo]

"I'm asking you is oral sex a perversion for a married couple? I don't care if you do it or not, is it a "perversion"?

It's your fantasy.....I dunno...you tell us.

I once put my mouth on a burning bush and after reflecting upon it, I thought it was awful, maybe even perverted. I won't do that again.

[Mr.B]

"I once put my mouth on a burning bush and after reflecting upon it, I thought it was awful, maybe even perverted. I won't do that again."

We used to call a burning bush the clap.....

[Mr.B]

"While Mr.B dodges a question that he knows his answer for...."

Yeah, but you don't know my answer, and it's driving you crazy....oh, wait...uhhh.......my bad....

[Mr.B]

"Banni, can I please be an Admiral?"

Why in the world would you wanna be a television?



Did you hear about the woman who was disappointed when she joined the Navy only to find a 21" Admiral was a television?

[neoplacebo]

That must have been a big woman....probably a Commodore.

[Sometime Lefty]

"I'm asking you is oral sex a perversion for a married couple? I don't care if you do it or not, is it a "perversion"?

It's your fantasy.....I dunno...you tell us.

We all know why you won't answer. If you do it, it isn't a perversion.

[Mr.B]

"We all know why you won't answer. If you do it, it isn't a perversion."

I haven't said one way or the other. I don't discuss my intimate life; I've more respect for my wife.

Why are you trying to parrot Vrede? That ain't healthy.

[Sometime Lefty]

Dodge. I didn't ask if YOU did it, I asked if it was a perversion. Vrede is an excellent debater. A true pitbull, never quits, or is it that the ever ready bunny? Doesn't matter, Vrede uses facts not brainwashing to refute and doesn't run away like some.

[Sometime Lefty]

Hey that's what my wife looks like just before she... never mind don't want to embarrass Mr B. His wife probably never enjoyed it. Poor thing! Oral sex- one of the best "perversions" ever invented!

[indago]

Vrede is an excellent debater. A true pitbull, never quits, or is it that the ever ready bunny? Doesn't matter, Vrede uses facts not brainwashing to refute and doesn't run away like some.

"Vrede" hallucinates and uses fantasy in support of his arguments. Hardly a trait worth emulating...

[Mr.B]

"Dodge. I didn't ask if YOU did it, I asked if it was a perversion."
You're right, it was a dodge. What a man and his wife do in their bedroom is what they make of it. If they want to indulge in such, then 'perversion' would be the decision of the 'indulgees'.

"Vrede is an excellent debater........Vrede uses facts not brainwashing to refute and doesn't run away like some."
Vrede a debater?? That's a laugh! Vrede is not a debater; rather a troll that has to inject his "intimidating supposed superiority" over others.

"A true pitbull, never quits...."
You got that right! Vrede is just like a pitbull that won't let go once he bites; keeps chewing and gnawing until the 'victim' gives up.
There's an old saying: "Won't let go until lightning strikes"; or in our case, loses interest.

Granted, there are times I appreciate his input on subjects, but the majority of his posts are put-downs of others' opinions, beliefs, and ideas. That's his nature; just pay close attention to his use of adjectives that he uses to describe others. He has no respect for other people; just those who parrot his opinions.

You strive on flattery?

[Mr.B]

". . . if it's a man and his spouse, depending on the spouse."

Oh yeah...I forgot....."spouse" in your world.

"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."

Another Biblical example of "confusion" :

An article might read thus:
"Jane and her wife Diane.....", or "Diane and her wife Jane...."
"John and his husband Roy.....", or "Roy and his husband John....."

So which of these confused souls is the wife, and which is the husband? If they adopt kids, which is the Mom, or which is the Dad?

Strive, thrive...not much difference where you're concerned. You strive for flattery because you thrive on it.

[rstrong]

"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."

Once again Mr.B - who disavows the ENTIRE Old Testament and declares it not part of Christianity when it contradicts his personal beliefs - quotes the Old Testament when it does.

He's no Christian. He shows no understanding of Christianity. He's just a bigot who has latched on to a nearby book as a convenient source of quotes, cherry-picking the ones that support his phobias hatred and bigotry, and ignoring the rest.

[Mr.B]

"If they adopt kids..." I said nothing about 'straights' or single-parent households. What part of "they" are you having trouble understanding?

" Where in the Bible are those? "
What part of "An article might read thus...." do you not understand?

"They're spouses, dummy."
Like I said, in your world. You're so confused.

"He's no Christian. He shows no understanding of Christianity. He's just a bigot who has latched on to a nearby book as a convenient source of quotes, cherry-picking the ones that support his phobias hatred and bigotry, and ignoring the rest."

I'll take what I am over what you aren't any day. I'll take being a bigot over being an idiot any day.

Like Vrede, you're caught up in your self-serving 'righteousness' and love for perversion.

Go ahead, call me all the names you want...sticks and stones and all that.
BTW...I'm still "latched on" to that book and I keep it nearby.

[Mr.B]

"......... cherry-picking the ones that support his phobias hatred and bigotry...."

You mean like Vrede cherry-picks the same verses that support his phobias, hatred, and bigotry over and over as above? He's got them saved in his documents so he can copy and paste them when his hate, phobia, and bigotry kick in. Good one, rstrong.

[indago]

Provide some examples, indago. Good luck and don't run away.

In contrast, here are some examples of your own hallucinations and use of fantasy in support of your arguments.
http://blueridgedebate.com/viewtopic.ph ... 599#p42599
http://blueridgedebate.com/viewtopic.ph ... 736#p42736
http://blueridgedebate.com/viewtopic.ph ... 662#p42662

Is that all you got? I don't see anything there that support your hallucination. And besides, I'm not the subject here, you are.

Of course, you ran away when challenged.

I'm still here, jerk!

ButtHurt Vrede wrote: "You're siding with Muslim fundies?" A total hallucination, conjured so that he can argue the hallucination rather than the point made.

ButtHurt Vrede wrote: "I haven't called anyone a liar but you, and I posted the quotes from your own article to prove it. Now, you've lied again." Another conjured hallucination, vomited up "so that he can argue the hallucination rather than the point made."

[Mr.B]

Vrede a Pit bull......point proven.

[bannination]

"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."

Once again Mr.B - who disavows the ENTIRE Old Testament and declares it not part of Christianity when it contradicts his personal beliefs - quotes the Old Testament when it does.

He's no Christian. He shows no understanding of Christianity. He's just a bigot who has latched on to a nearby book as a convenient source of quotes, cherry-picking the ones that support his phobias hatred and bigotry, and ignoring the rest.

This. :thumbsup:

[rstrong]

"......... cherry-picking the ones that support his phobias hatred and bigotry...."

You mean like Vrede cherry-picks the same verses that support his phobias, hatred, and bigotry over and over as above? He's got them saved in his documents so he can copy and paste them when his hate, phobia, and bigotry kick in. Good one, rstrong.

If you're referring to the Leviticus quotes, that's not cherry picking. It's simply showing what you didn't pick.

You cherry-pick Biblical passages that support your sick beliefs - while ignoring and even disavowing those that don't. Vrede acknowledges that your quotes exist, but supplies the context: passages that you as a supposed Christian are equally bound by, but ignore or disavow. While consistently disagreeing with all of them.

[indago]

ButtHurt Vrede has quislingly quibbled: "You hallucinated contradictions to what your own article clearly said, then never had the balls to man-up when proven wrong by quotes from it." Also: " indago's hallucinated examples failed, utterly, while he was too butt hurt to even try and disprove mine."

Prove it!