Only within the "Party of Lincoln."Mr.B wrote:That set that "Women's Lib" thingy back a few years, huh?![]()
Because they never made it out of the 1860s either.
Only within the "Party of Lincoln."Mr.B wrote:That set that "Women's Lib" thingy back a few years, huh?![]()
"Women's Lib"?? Seriously?? So how old are you, Mr.B? I'd guess you have to be 60-something or close to it. That means you had to be born no later than around 1955. Although a fight for equality continues, what was referred to as "Women's Lib" had accomplished most of its first goals by the mid-seventies or when you would have been 20ish. Also, "women's lib" was co-opted as a derogatory term and hasn't used much by real "libbers" for about 40 years - more than half your life.Mr.B wrote:That set that "Women's Lib" thingy back a few years, huh?Vrede wrote:"bring it down to a woman’s level"?“Men do tend to talk about things on a much higher level,” Congresswoman Renee Ellmers (R-NC2) said. “Many of my male colleagues, when they go to the House floor, you know, they’ve got some pie chart or graph behind them and they’re talking about trillions of dollars and how, you know, the debt is awful and, you know, we all agree with that. We need our male colleagues to understand that if you can bring it down to a woman’s level...that’s the way to go.”
Maybe hers.![]()
No, can't say I do understand. I understand jokes - even jokes that are old or way out-dated. But I don't understand people so unaware of the world in which they live. For example, I frequently run into managers in their 40's who for some reason think it's OK to say they'd "prefer a male" in the job or "s/he's too old" or "I don't want to hire anybody who won't work on Sunday..." etc. Yet these things have been illegal since before this guy was born. Although discrimination still exists, almost every company in the US has had non-discrimination training and non-discrimination policies in place long before this guy got out of grade school. Where has he been all his life? Jokes about the stereotypical "homely braless hairy-legged libber" might have been funny to some in 1975, but now practically every woman in the country supports the principles and benefits from the efforts of those sasquatches. So the stereotype doesn't fit so well when we're talking about our own mothers, does it?Mr.B wrote:So....did you just come from under your rock?
I'm aware how old this 'lib' thing is, and it's still the butt of a few jokes, many of which you wouldn't understand.
My point was that Ellmers said something that was deemed derogatory to women's capabilities; something that was one of the points of the WL movement.
Are you beginning to understand now..... or are you just continuing your chain-yanking game with Mr.B ?
I guess not.O Really wrote: "So the stereotype doesn't fit so well when we're talking about our own mothers, does it?"
Consider the source, Mr.B. Same comment wouldn't have been in character if, for example, rstrong had said it. For you, it was believable. Sorry for the misunderstanding.Mr.B wrote:I guess not.O Really wrote: "So the stereotype doesn't fit so well when we're talking about our own mothers, does it?"
It's amazing how someone can take words spoken in jest (or otherwise), and make a mud-slinging fest out of it. Just look at this forums' dwindling membership.....
Thanks.O Really wrote: "Consider the source, Mr.B. Same comment wouldn't have been in character if, for example, rstrong had said it. For you, it was believable. Sorry for the misunderstanding."
Did anyone else hear that strange noise?The Bully wrote:"But not for my backing you up?"Mr.B wrote:"Thanks."![]()
"I guess it didn't fit your current "bully" meme."
Saw that this morning. Probly won't be long before one of those prolife terrorists gets violent with one or both of them.
In those two photos, which is the husband and which is the wife?