Homos

[neoplacebo]

"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."

Once again Mr.B - who disavows the ENTIRE Old Testament and declares it not part of Christianity when it contradicts his personal beliefs - quotes the Old Testament when it does.

He's no Christian. He shows no understanding of Christianity. He's just a bigot who has latched on to a nearby book as a convenient source of quotes, cherry-picking the ones that support his phobias hatred and bigotry, and ignoring the rest.

Preachers do this every Sunday; pick a sermon to spew to the gullible and pretend all the other "scripture" that doesn't fit with their message just doesn't exist. Then they ask for money. I think it's shameful."Tell them what they want to hear" is the standard refuge of charlatans and hacks. The worst part is that they have been pretty successful at it for a long time, but less so as time passes.

[O Really]

[
An article might read thus:
"Jane and her wife Diane.....", or "Diane and her wife Jane...."
"John and his husband Roy.....", or "Roy and his husband John....."

So which of these confused souls is the wife, and which is the husband? If they adopt kids, which is the Mom, or which is the Dad?

.

"Confusion" created only in your mind, Mr.B. Males are husbands and dads; females are wives and moms. Being homosexual doesn't change ones gender. I'll bet you thought gay couples divided themselves into mom/dad wife/husband roles, didn't you? I'll bet you've seen a couple that included what some disrespectfully refer to as a "bull lesbian" and thought "well we know who's the man in that relationship." And why just "adopt." Lots of homosexuals are birth parents.

[Mr.B]

Not my confusion, O Really.

Let's say for a moment that 'Jane and Diane' in the above scenario were your "parents"......which one would you call "Mom"...and
if 'John and Roy' were your "parents", which one would you call "Dad"? Explain that one to a small child adopted by homosexuals. That's confusion.

confusion: (noun)
1...an act causing a disorderly combination of elements with identities lost and distinctions blended

2...a lack of clarity or order

3...the state of being mixed or blended so as to produce indistinctness or error; indistinct; disorder; tumult

[O Really]

Not my confusion, O Really.

Let's say for a moment that 'Jane and Diane' in the above scenario were your "parents"......which one would you call "Mom"...and
if 'John and Roy' were your "parents", which one would you call "Dad"? Explain that one to a small child adopted by homosexuals. That's confusion.
t

Oh puh-leeze. Maybe the kid says "daddy-john' and "daddy-roy" or has another name - like kids come up with names for the grandparents, the step-parents, whoever. It's not rocket surgery.

[neoplacebo]

Religion is the opiate of the people. I think it was Karl Marx who said that. Now we have real opiates and religion takes a lesser role. Neoplacebo 12:1: 1

[indago]

I did, by providing the full contexts and links - something you conveniently neglected to do - and you did not even try to disprove my examples. Pay attention.

So, where's the lie?

[Mr.B]

"Preachers do this every Sunday; pick a sermon to spew to the gullible and pretend all the other "scripture" that doesn't fit with their message just doesn't exist. Then they ask for money. I think it's shameful. "Tell them what they want to hear" is the standard refuge of charlatans and hacks. The worst part is that they have been pretty successful at it for a long time, but less so as time passes."

Citation?
Where do you go to church that you experience what you've described?
Or....where have you gleaned this expert knowledge of what goes on in church services?
Or...are you just blowing smoke to entertain and impress Vrede?

[Mr.B]

"Mr.B gets confused when a child has 2 uncles or 2 aunts."

Only when you're mentioning your Uncle Daddy or Aunt Mommy.

[Mr.B]

"Oh puh-leeze. Maybe the kid says "daddy-john' and "daddy-roy" or has another name......."

That's the point. Two 'daddies' :

"Daddy-John (Roy)....why do I have two daddies and my friend Timmy has a Mommy and Daddy...where's Mommy?

Timmy came out of his Mommy's tummy, did I come out (one of) your asses, or mouth?

[Mr.B]

"Obsessed with me, as usual."

Don't flatter yourself......you're not even worth a fleeting thought; let alone a fantasy or obsession.

[indago]

ButtHurt Vrede has obtusely obfuscated: "We weren't quite discussing lies, indago. You've lost track already. Rather we were discussing your claims that I hallucinate and use fantasy... (and other and sundry aberrations, ramifications, fixations, lamentations, hallucinations, and incantations)"

You had conjured: "I haven't called anyone a liar but you, and I posted the quotes from your own article to prove it. Now, you've lied again."

I, then, queried: "So, where's the lie?"

I don't blame you for wanting to change the subject, considering the fact that you have proved my point.

You are EPIC FAIL

[Mr.B]

"Uterus, and every child came out of one."
Except you...two buzzards flying backwards bumped asses and you fell out.

"did I come out (one of) your asses, or mouth?"

"Obsessed with gay orifices, as usual."
You nailed that one..."gay orifices".
I'd hate to think that a man's mouth or anus is nothing more than an orifice to stick a d*ck into.
Of course that's your fantasy & obsession, isn't it? ......
otherwise you wouldn't accuse others of fantasizing or obsessing when the subject is mentioned briefly in an exchange of words.

BTW...do you like my new quotation marks?.....or do they turn your little ol' world upside down too?

[Mr.B]

... asses ...

Obsessed, as usual.

Obsessed with gay orifices, as usual.

You nailed that one..."gay orifices".

You just admitted your obsession, big of you.

I'd hate to think that a man's mouth or anus is nothing more than an orifice to stick a d*ck into.

Is that how you see Mrs.B's orifices?

Of course that's your fantasy & obsession, isn't it? ......

You're fantasizing that I'm gay, again. Clearly, you desperately want to have intercourse with gays, nttawwt.

otherwise you wouldn't accuse others of fantasizing or obsessing when the subject is mentioned briefly in an exchange of words.

"the subject is" your obsession with me even when replying to neoplacebo, and I did not say sexually. You've lost track, again.

BTW...do you like my new quotation marks?

Yes, I do like your ignorance of grammar, your choice to go bigger with it, and the effort you waste doing so. Thank you.

.....or do they turn your little ol' world upside down too?

Fantasizing, again.

Point run away from by Mr.B, as usual:

neoplacebo did not say that it's all of them and you've admitted that some preachers do exactly this which, of course, is undeniable. Have you "forgotten" your own posts already?

[Mr.B]

{....}

[Mr.B]

Nothing I've said should have involved my wife.

I've not "ran anywhere"....you got my drift, though? Again, I mean it.

[neoplacebo]

"Preachers do this every Sunday; pick a sermon to spew to the gullible and pretend all the other "scripture" that doesn't fit with their message just doesn't exist. Then they ask for money. I think it's shameful. "Tell them what they want to hear" is the standard refuge of charlatans and hacks. The worst part is that they have been pretty successful at it for a long time, but less so as time passes."

Citation?
Where do you go to church that you experience what you've described?
Or....where have you gleaned this expert knowledge of what goes on in church services?
Or...are you just blowing smoke to entertain and impress Vrede?

Citation? Ok, check any of the billboards or lighted signs in front of any church in any town in this country. You will not find reference to any of the passages from Leviticus posted here previously. You will only find words and phrases that suit what the messenger (preacher) wants you to hear. It's no different than 500 years ago when the message was just as it is today; "don't think for yourself. Instead listen to me and know what I say is true." And I personally don't go to church to experience this; I don't have to because I know they won't be preaching about where to buy your slaves, when to murder your children, etc. And, this is not expert knowledge, just a fact of organized religion (disregard the parts of the scriptures that you'd rather not admit exist). Lastly, I blow smoke for my own pleasure, not to entertain or impress anyone. But should someone be impressed by it, that's fine, too.

[neoplacebo]

Is that how you see Mrs.B's orifices?

Last warning: Keep my wife out of your goddamned queer-obsessed remarks....I mean it, Vrede, and I'm serious as a heart attack.

You could also have said "Homey don't play that."

[indago]

Ah, you were referring to a single one of the 5 examples we were discussing, indago.

WRONG! Just goes to show how wrong you can be.

[Mr.B]

Nothing I've said should have involved my wife.

Nothing I've said should have involved my parents.....Watcha (sic) gonna do, tough guy?

You got pissed because I said your parents should have beat your ass more often; and you got all bent out of shape about it and started making remarks about my wife, up to the vulgar crap you posted today. There was nothing in that post about your parents, only about "queer-sex" that you accuse me of obsessing about. Why was that descriptive subject so sensitive to you? This forum is used by it's pitiful amount of members that's left; the ones you haven't run off yet, and does not involve our spouses or kids. My parents are dead as well, and any spewings about them from you or anyone else is moot and useless.

If push comes to shove, you have no idea what I'm capable of; but I will NOT allow my wife to be dragged into the filth and scum of this forum
that you champion.

I will continue to express my opinions here until I tire of it, or I'm banned; neither of which would be a catastrophic event. Up to this point, I've taken all your and others remarks and goading with a grain of salt; I thought of the whole past-time as fun.

If you really "mean it" and aren't just throwing a hissy fit, you know exactly how to get Mrs.B off the table. Whiny and half-assed won't be sufficient this time and any immediate backtracking will land us right back here. Again, either way is fine with me, your choice.
I mean what I said above; I only regret the way I said it; therefore I deleted it. As far as I'm concerned, Mrs.B is "OFF THE TABLE" and don't mention her again. Call me whiny and half-assed all you like; I will continue to post as I always have. I'm not ashamed of my beliefs nor my attitude towards homosexuality. I've said many times, I hate no one, it's the lifestyle I abhor.

Now that we've addressed that diversion, how is your obsessive characterization of gay sex any different from applying the same description to straight sex?
Anytime anyone mentions something, you come back with that silly-ass "obsession" remark. How else would you "characterize" sex between two men any differently than what I described? Also again, why did that get your drawers all in a wad?

[Mr.B]

"Why did you quote me at the bottom of page 6 without posting a word of your own? Flustered?"

I was unaware my remarks were not posted; I must've hit submit instead of preview...I don't know. Here's what I intended:

Vrede: Obsessed with gay orifices, as usual.

Mr.B : You nailed that one..."gay orifices".

Vrede: You just admitted your obsession, big of you.

Mr.B: YOU were the one who called a "gay" man's mouth and anus "gay orifices"....it's YOUR obsession.
I'd hate to think that a man's mouth or anus is nothing more than an orifice to stick a d*ck into.

That's when the ship hit the sand.......