Good question. Or asked if he needed anything, or even when he expected his parents. Call the cops? For a 12-year old kid in his own yard? Seriously? In places other than Congress and state legislatures, the inmates have surely taken over the asylum.Vrede too wrote:I wonder why the nosy neighbor didn't just go sit with him and/or offer him some lemonade and a seat on her/his porch. That's what would have happened when I was a kid and among my friends now.
Free Range Kids
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23172
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Free Range Kids
- Colonel Taylor
- Marshal
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Free Range Kids
Let the guvmit take care of your children.
Ya know it takes a village..... of idiots.



Ya know it takes a village..... of idiots.


- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23172
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Free Range Kids
Some over-zealous local yokels mis-apply a state law and somehow it's Obama's fault even though he probably didn't know the law existed or could be applied that way and likely would not agree with the action taken. Yep. That's your current standard of right-wing "thought." Even Bill Buckley is twirling in his grave.
- Colonel Taylor
- Marshal
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Free Range Kids
You mean like everything wrong in OBlamers life and with the country is Bush's fault?O Really wrote:Some over-zealous local yokels mis-apply a state law and somehow it's Obama's fault even though he probably didn't know the law existed or could be applied that way and likely would not agree with the action taken. Yep. That's your current standard of right-wing "thought." Even Bill Buckley is twirling in his grave.

- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: Free Range Kids
....says the "everything wrong in the country in Obama's fault" nutjob who just posted a "Comrade Obama" picture, despite Obama running the country as essentially a pre-Tea-Party mainstream Republican. (But more fiscally conservative and more libertarian.)Colonel Taylor wrote:You mean like everything wrong in OBlamers life and with the country is Bush's fault?
Your picture is even complete with obligatory "taking away everyone's guns" submoronic wingnuttery, despite Obama being demonstrably more pro-gun than even Ronald Reagan and most Republicans before just a few years ago. Yes, really.
- Colonel Taylor
- Marshal
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Free Range Kids
rstrong wrote:....says the "everything wrong in the country in Obama's fault" nutjob who just posted a "Comrade Obama" picture, despite Obama running the country as essentially a pre-Tea-Party mainstream Republican. (But more fiscally conservative and more libertarian.)Colonel Taylor wrote:You mean like everything wrong in OBlamers life and with the country is Bush's fault?
Wow so what do y'all smoking by the way?
Your picture is even complete with obligatory "taking away everyone's guns" submoronic wingnuttery, despite Obama being demonstrably more pro-gun than even Ronald Reagan and most Republicans before just a few years ago. Yes, really.
- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: Free Range Kids
What part of this do you disagree with. Examples?Colonel Taylor wrote:rstrong wrote:....says the "everything wrong in the country in Obama's fault" nutjob who just posted a "Comrade Obama" picture, despite Obama running the country as essentially a pre-Tea-Party mainstream Republican. (But more fiscally conservative and more libertarian.)Colonel Taylor wrote:You mean like everything wrong in OBlamers life and with the country is Bush's fault?
Wow so what do y'all smoking by the way?
Really. Look it up. The Republican party has move FAR to the right since Reagan, and the Democrats have followed.
Obama has stuck to Republican policy across the board. Even ObamaCare is 15 years of Republican health care policy up until the moment Obama adopted it. That includes the personal mandate - now described by Republicans as commie Marxist socialism - but previously pushed by the far-right Heritage Foundation, Bob Dole, Newt Gingrich, Jim DeMint, Mitt Romney and a great many more Republicans.
Perhaps you believe in **pre**-election Reagan: Smaller government, less government debt, more libertarian, abortions banned, etc. But it's only fair to consider **post**-election Reagan, as he actually ran the White House. He grew government, ran the deficits and debt through the roof and passed it to the next generation, turned his back on the anti-abortion crowd once elected, etc. Reagan's military adventure in Lebanon even managed to make Jimmy Carter look like a military genius.
Sure, you could make the case for him cutting government regulation, but no more than you could make the same case for Obama or even Carter. And Obama's stance on same-sex marriage is far more libertarian than that of most Republicans even today.
Still, even for a conservative like myself there's a whole lot about Obama's reign that I don't like. The NSA stuff, not prosecuting those who turned the US into a torture state, all the TSA theatrics, etc. Your whining notwithstanding, almost all of it IS him stocking to Republican policy from the previous administration. Or in the case of the TPP scam, the previous Republican administration AND current Republican. If you think otherwise, give us some examples.
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23172
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Free Range Kids
The colonel seems to believe (still) that all Democratic presidents get a clean slate starting January 21 after election. That nothing existed in the political world before them, and nothing is out of their authority or control. Therefore, and conditions that exist on January 22 are automatically the fault of the new Democrats.
Except for constant Obama-bashing, however, the NC Republican legislature does not believe they got a clean slate. They believe everything wrong (or that they might define as wrong) is the fault of 140 years of Democratic majority. Of course, in those 140 years, NC became a leader in a lot of stuff. This wasn't because it was just one party, but because the Democratic party had a very big tent, with a wide range of ideology. However, not being obliged to automatically disagree with their colleagues - just ummm because he's one of "them" - the legislature got stuff done. Good education system, good roads, attracting some big time industry including tech, pharmaceuticals, financial, yada. But whatever the reality, the Republicans took power and blamed the Democrats for existing conditions.
So my question for the Colonel is, how long should a President be in office before being blamed for current conditions? One day? One month? One year?
Is it dishonest to say "President Bush created some conditions that cannot immediately be undone"? And does that factual statement ever become untrue?
Is it possible for a rational person to say both "Obama can't blame Bush for anything" and "NC Republicans can blame the Democrats for everything."
Except for constant Obama-bashing, however, the NC Republican legislature does not believe they got a clean slate. They believe everything wrong (or that they might define as wrong) is the fault of 140 years of Democratic majority. Of course, in those 140 years, NC became a leader in a lot of stuff. This wasn't because it was just one party, but because the Democratic party had a very big tent, with a wide range of ideology. However, not being obliged to automatically disagree with their colleagues - just ummm because he's one of "them" - the legislature got stuff done. Good education system, good roads, attracting some big time industry including tech, pharmaceuticals, financial, yada. But whatever the reality, the Republicans took power and blamed the Democrats for existing conditions.
So my question for the Colonel is, how long should a President be in office before being blamed for current conditions? One day? One month? One year?
Is it dishonest to say "President Bush created some conditions that cannot immediately be undone"? And does that factual statement ever become untrue?
Is it possible for a rational person to say both "Obama can't blame Bush for anything" and "NC Republicans can blame the Democrats for everything."
-
- A bad person.
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm
Re: Free Range Kids
That's what you get for letting presidents out on the street or playground by themselves .... "Free Range Kids"
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 57301
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Free Range Kids
How did Obama get into a discussion of what the FL state CPS did in a state headed by a GOP Governor and GOP Legislature?
F' ELON
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23172
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Free Range Kids
If not finding a way to blame Obama, the Colonel would have found himself in agreement with us "libruls" that what they did with that kid was outrageous. Couldn't have that happen now, could we? Might break his belief in the absolute evil of Democrats or "libruls." Or that - even worse - he doesn't agree with what the Republican-run state did.Vrede too wrote:How did Obama get into a discussion of what the FL state CPS did in a state headed by a GOP Governor and GOP Legislature?
-
- Captain
- Posts: 5592
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
- Location: Hendersonville
- Contact:
Re: Free Range Kids
Don't hold your breath for that reply.rstrong wrote: What part of this do you disagree with. Examples?
- Colonel Taylor
- Marshal
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Free Range Kids
rstrong wrote:....says the "everything wrong in the country in Obama's fault" nutjob who just posted a "Comrade Obama" picture, despite Obama running the country as essentially a pre-Tea-Party mainstream Republican. (But more fiscally conservative and more libertarian.)Colonel Taylor wrote:You mean like everything wrong in OBlamers life and with the country is Bush's fault?
I have said and mentioned many things Bush did wrong when he was POTUS unlike those who protect your supreme leader here.
Your picture is even complete with obligatory "taking away everyone's guns" submoronic wingnuttery, despite Obama being demonstrably more pro-gun than even Ronald Reagan and most Republicans before just a few years ago. Yes, really.
It took him less then 30 minutes yesterday to bring up gun control. You do know this was a gun free zone right? Lets not forget the liberal right to passage Never let a tragedy go to waste. Color, race or nothing else had to do with this young man being a mental midget dumbass. He hated so much if not a gun a vehicle filled with gas or explosives.
OBlamer brought up gun control many times over the years it just doesn't go anywhere because we all see how great it's working in chicago, dc and cleveland. All gun free zones.

- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23172
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Free Range Kids
Seriously? He hated what so much? Oh yeah, according to him, it was black people.Colonel Taylor wrote:...Color, race or nothing else had to do with this young man being a mental midget dumbass. He hated so much if not a gun a vehicle filled with gas or explosives.
None of those cities are "gun-free" zones, but they do have more restrictions than a lot of other places. BTW, you forgot to include Connecticut.
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 57301
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Free Range Kids
O Really wrote:Colonel Taylor wrote:...Color, race or nothing else had to do with this young man being a mental midget dumbass.
We should defer to Kernel Failure's expertise on the matter.
He hated so much if not a gun a vehicle filled with gas or explosives.
Sounds like Kernel Failure can empathize and has thought this through.
F' ELON
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
- Colonel Taylor
- Marshal
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Free Range Kids
What a site where the adm can't even get his ignore feature to work! 

-
- A bad person.
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm
Re: Free Range Kids
What.....? You wanting them to get any crazier? Get a grip man... without me and you, they wouldn't have any reason to come here for... give 'em a break already!Colonel Taylor wrote:"What a site where the adm can't even get his ignore feature to work!"
- Colonel Taylor
- Marshal
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Free Range Kids
Na when things get slow here banni goes to con forums and brings their post over here. Ya know without being able to think for themselves.Mr.B wrote:What.....? You wanting them to get any crazier? Get a grip man... without me and you, they wouldn't have any reason to come here for... give 'em a break already!Colonel Taylor wrote:"What a site where the adm can't even get his ignore feature to work!"
This from someone who can't even get his own ignore option to work.










- Boatrocker
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2066
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
- Location: Southeast of Disorder
Re: Free Range Kids
That's rarely necessary, when we have crackers like you posting in here on a regular basis.Colonel Taylor wrote: . . . Na when things get slow here banni goes to con forums and brings their post over here . . . .
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
- Vrede too
- Superstar Cultmaster
- Posts: 57301
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:46 am
- Location: Hendersonville, NC
Re: Free Range Kids
Kernel Failure is a pretty good argument for not allowing Free Range Adults.
F' ELON
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD
and the
FELON
1312. ETTD