hokiewoodchuck wrote:So you folks give my name out again.....LOL!
Sorry but it doesn't bother one bit since the last time. It just seems cowards hide behind screen names.
It seems as if you cannot keep up me me teaching you lessons y'all just resort to name calling, posting false and defamatory lies and such.
Knock yourself out cause he who laughs last, laughs best.
Now that you have been labeled a liar..........whose gonna believe you. If you have any street cred please share with us your real ID. But then again we wouldn't believe that either. Either way you lose.
And it is spelled Koran........grins!
I love being an arrogant American......life couldn't be better.
Sorry Hokiewoodchuck, but is this post addressed to me, if so, I'm not following you at all. I just asked why you don't burn the Quran like you keep daring Tertius to do?
And don't you have a screen name like everyone here? So why do you consider some people cowards because they have a screen name, and you aren't, even though you have a screen name as well?
And feel free to spell it "Koran", use a red crayon while you spell it out on your mommie's wall, might as well.
Just curious, what do you have to be arrogant about?
Morons abound these days.
And yes I have burned a Koran and will do so again if need be.
And yes I will write it on any wall I feel I need to do so however my mother has no walls as she is in Heaven as we speak. She died almost two years ago.......Feel better Now?
And this will be the last post directed at you. I do not engage folks like you in a conversation as you don't have enough sense to peel a banana.
My name has been put out there...........What's yours coward.
Now if you can address the topic at hand that will be quite an achievement in your world.
Colonel Taylor wrote:
Or she can come out and say I TOLD THE WHITE house and look like the Hero to her followers and the rest of the Dems and in 4 years run for POTUS. They were out foxed.
Why would she lie? Hildabeast is a politician, worse yet a democrat.
Because you do it all the time? The adhom attack belies your desire to deflect the issue. Your basic assumption because you're so familiar with the behavior? See first response to your silly claim.
She couldn't tell the White House if she herself were not told. During the testimony on CSpan, Ms. Lamb said they were in satellite phone contact with the Ambassadors people in the compound during the attack, do you seriously believe Rice did not contact Hildabeast immediately after that? And where did you get the idea that she wants to run in four years?Hildabeast has wanted nothing more, even the taste of carpet, than to be President, are you that delusional?
And yes I have burned a Koran and will do so again if need be.
And yes I will write it on any wall I feel I need to do so however my mother has no walls as she is in Heaven as we speak. She died almost two years ago.......Feel better Now?
And this will be the last post directed at you. I do not engage folks like you in a conversation as you don't have enough sense to peel a banana.
My name has been put out there...........What's yours coward.
Now if you can address the topic at hand that will be quite an achievement in your world.
So, we have established by your own statements that you have already burned one Quran, and you will burn another "if need be". What would this "need" be, to make you burn another Quran? If you're really the brave little man that you've always dreamt about being, how about adding a last name to the name "Neil", that Crock Hunter called you, then with your full name, along with your claim of burning a Quran, you will really be the brave little man you claim to be.
But you won't do this, because you Sir are the real coward here. Think before you open your mouth and you won't look as foolish as you do right now.
And yes I have burned a Koran and will do so again if need be.
And yes I will write it on any wall I feel I need to do so however my mother has no walls as she is in Heaven as we speak. She died almost two years ago.......Feel better Now?
And this will be the last post directed at you. I do not engage folks like you in a conversation as you don't have enough sense to peel a banana.
My name has been put out there...........What's yours coward.
Now if you can address the topic at hand that will be quite an achievement in your world.
So, we have established by your own statements that you have already burned one Quran, and you will burn another "if need be". What would this "need" be, to make you burn another Quran? If you're really the brave little man that you've always dreamt about being, how about adding a last name to the name "Neil", that Crock Hunter called you, then with your full name, along with your claim of burning a Quran, you will really be the brave little man you claim to be.
But you won't do this, because you Sir are the real coward here. Think before you open your mouth and you won't look as foolish as you do right now.
What does burning a Quran/Koran have to do with cowardice? This whole line of thought is simply ridiculous. the man has his right to do whatever he wants with their bible just as you iberals do with Christian symbols.
Let's look at reality, what good has Islam actually ever done in its life as a religion? How does subjegation of women and murdering of non practicing muslims qualify in liberals minds as something to crow about?
Islam is a terrible cult which should be eradicated from the face of the earth.
lessthantolerant wrote:
Hildabeast suffers from the same mindset Obie does, they like the lifers in the State Department believe if we act passive and plead nicely than all people will love us.
Tell that to bin Laden and all the Taliban and Al Qaeda who've been wiped out by drone strikes.
What they don't believe in is heavy, jack-booted invasions at the costs of thousands of American lives, trillions added to the debt, a loss of leadership around the world, and the increase of anti-American sentiment around the world -- i.e. more terrorists ready to attack America.
These very same people believe America is inherently evil and corrupt.
No, but they probably believe that some of America is ignorant and easily-deluded. Especially if they read your posts.
They sacrificed Ambassador Stevens and his security detail to their ideology.
That's just stupid.
Watching them all run for cover and try to cover their affirmative action puppet Obie is too funny.
Yeah, telling the truth is a big sin, according to the right-wing sheep. How'd that birth certificat thing work out for you? How'd that Fast and Furious thing work out for you?
Do you guys hate the truth because you spread so many lies, or do you spread so many lies because you hate the truth?
lessthantolerant wrote:
Hildabeast suffers from the same mindset Obie does, they like the lifers in the State Department believe if we act passive and plead nicely than all people will love us.
Tell that to bin Laden and all the Taliban and Al Qaeda who've been wiped out by drone strikes.
What they don't believe in is heavy, jack-booted invasions at the costs of thousands of American lives, trillions added to the debt, a loss of leadership around the world, and the increase of anti-American sentiment around the world -- i.e. more terrorists ready to attack America.
These very same people believe America is inherently evil and corrupt.
No, but they probably believe that some of America is ignorant and easily-deluded. Especially if they read your posts.
They sacrificed Ambassador Stevens and his security detail to their ideology.
That's just stupid.
Watching them all run for cover and try to cover their affirmative action puppet Obie is too funny.
Yeah, telling the truth is a big sin, according to the right-wing sheep. How'd that birth certificat thing work out for you? How'd that Fast and Furious thing work out for you?
Do you guys hate the truth because you spread so many lies, or do you spread so many lies because you hate the truth?
Wow! Talk about delusional. You poor libbies are so entertaining to watch how you would justify your stupidity and hate for America.
lessthantolerant wrote:
Hildabeast suffers from the same mindset Obie does, they like the lifers in the State Department believe if we act passive and plead nicely than all people will love us.
Tell that to bin Laden and all the Taliban and Al Qaeda who've been wiped out by drone strikes.
What they don't believe in is heavy, jack-booted invasions at the costs of thousands of American lives, trillions added to the debt, a loss of leadership around the world, and the increase of anti-American sentiment around the world -- i.e. more terrorists ready to attack America.
These very same people believe America is inherently evil and corrupt.
No, but they probably believe that some of America is ignorant and easily-deluded. Especially if they read your posts.
They sacrificed Ambassador Stevens and his security detail to their ideology.
That's just stupid.
Watching them all run for cover and try to cover their affirmative action puppet Obie is too funny.
Yeah, telling the truth is a big sin, according to the right-wing sheep. How'd that birth certificat thing work out for you? How'd that Fast and Furious thing work out for you?
Do you guys hate the truth because you spread so many lies, or do you spread so many lies because you hate the truth?
Wow! Talk about delusional. You poor libbies are so entertaining to watch how you would justify your stupidity and hate for America.
Whoa. I just shot down a heavy dose of your stupidity, and I did it with stupidity? That must make your inanities extra-extra-double-stupid.
You post nothing but ignorant, completely unsubstantiated, knee-jerk conjecture, and then claim that anyone who laughs at your nonsense is stupid.
Best you can do, I guess.
And please give some example of my "hate for America." Just more of your ignorant, completely unsubstantiated, dishonest knee-jerk conjecture.
And yes I have burned a Koran and will do so again if need be.
And yes I will write it on any wall I feel I need to do so however my mother has no walls as she is in Heaven as we speak. She died almost two years ago.......Feel better Now?
And this will be the last post directed at you. I do not engage folks like you in a conversation as you don't have enough sense to peel a banana.
My name has been put out there...........What's yours coward.
Now if you can address the topic at hand that will be quite an achievement in your world.
So, we have established by your own statements that you have already burned one Quran, and you will burn another "if need be". What would this "need" be, to make you burn another Quran? If you're really the brave little man that you've always dreamt about being, how about adding a last name to the name "Neil", that Crock Hunter called you, then with your full name, along with your claim of burning a Quran, you will really be the brave little man you claim to be.
But you won't do this, because you Sir are the real coward here. Think before you open your mouth and you won't look as foolish as you do right now.
They (Neil, that idiot film maker and Pastor Qur'an Burner) are the worst kind of cowards.. They incessantly mouth off about their First Amendment rights while purposefully avoiding the responsibility that comes with such rights. When soldiers or diplomats are killed as a result of their "need" to lip off THEY are as guilty as any accessory to murder.
IF they had the courage of their convictions, they would expose themselves to the danger when they ran their mouths rather than hide behind someone much more courageous than they are.
It should disgust any American to see hokie old men rattling sabers when young brave men die covering their saggy asses..
And yes I have burned a Koran and will do so again if need be.
And yes I will write it on any wall I feel I need to do so however my mother has no walls as she is in Heaven as we speak. She died almost two years ago.......Feel better Now?
And this will be the last post directed at you. I do not engage folks like you in a conversation as you don't have enough sense to peel a banana.
My name has been put out there...........What's yours coward.
Now if you can address the topic at hand that will be quite an achievement in your world.
So, we have established by your own statements that you have already burned one Quran, and you will burn another "if need be". What would this "need" be, to make you burn another Quran? If you're really the brave little man that you've always dreamt about being, how about adding a last name to the name "Neil", that Crock Hunter called you, then with your full name, along with your claim of burning a Quran, you will really be the brave little man you claim to be.
But you won't do this, because you Sir are the real coward here. Think before you open your mouth and you won't look as foolish as you do right now.
What does burning a Quran/Koran have to do with cowardice? This whole line of thought is simply ridiculous. the man has his right to do whatever he wants with their bible just as you iberals do with Christian symbols.
Let's look at reality, what good has Islam actually ever done in its life as a religion? How does subjegation of women and murdering of non practicing muslims qualify in liberals minds as something to crow about?
Islam is a terrible cult which should be eradicated from the face of the earth.
Let's look at reality, what good has Islam actually ever done in its life as a religion?
About the same as Christianity, except we keep bombing them back to the middle ages every time they start becoming civilized. They don't have a chance to grow up like Christianity mostly did.
There's not a thing that Islam has done that Christianity hasn't.
Our Benghazi consulate was guarded by unarmed Libyan contractors making $4.00 an hour. Even MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell said Biden lied during Thursday's debate. Biden said more than one time no one in the Obama administration knew of request for extra security by Ambassador Stevens and others. Mitchell noted the State Department knew "in real time," of the request and needs.
Request for additional security were denied in spite of 230 security incidents in Libya from June 2011 to July 2012. There were 48 security breaches in Benghazi.
Biden denied what Eric Nordstrom pointed out in his testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Nordstrom was a regional security officer of the US Mission to Libya from September 2011 to July 2012. He said that he was told in a phone call in July that the deployment of the Libyan security team, 16 member American military unit based in Tripoli could not be prolonged.
Not only were Norstrom's request for additional security denies by the State Department but the number of Diplomatic Security Service agents assigned to Libya's foreign service office was reduced to ONE. Security consisted of one DSS agent, four armed members of the 17th of February Martyrs Brigade (a Libyan Muslim Militia) and unarmed Libyan contractors. These contractors were employed by the British based Blue Mountain Group.
A message from the State Department, with a copy sent to Ambassador Stevens, denied a request by a group of Special Forces assigned to protect the US Embassy in Libya to use a DC-3 for security operations though out Libya.
As for funding four days after the request for the DC-3 and additional security was denied Stevens The State Dept. authorized the US Embassy in Vienna to buy a $108,000 electric-car charging station for the new Chevrolet Volts added to the motor pool.
Obama and Biden declared the war on terror is over, al-Qaida stopped, and bin Laden dead, and climate change the greatest threat to America and the world. The Obama administration including the State Department’s mission was “Energy Efficiency Sweep of Europe.†This included millions of dollars spent on alternative energy cars and other investments throughout Europe. The “Greening of European Embassies†is on.
Military spending and troop deployment is for the most part at the Commander-in-Chief’s discretion as is energy spending and executive management function. We have and had hundreds of thousands of military troops in the area. Deployment is within the President’s command and control
David Axelrod was interviewed by Chris Wallace this morning. Wallace asked him about Biden saying "we did not know" and who "we" was. Axelrod said "we" meant the White House. Well now we know who got thrown under the bus, Hillary and the State Department. I am sure this will nor set well with Clinton, Inc. as it is pretty well accepted that Bill is not exactly pleased with BO. It will be interesting to watch this circus unfold.
Supsalemgr wrote: It will be interesting to watch this circus unfold.
Well you make the 3rd or 4th clown today to crawl out of the car and wave that flag around... however..
The conservative media talking point that the White House abdicated its responsibility to secure the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, took a hit Wednesday when CNN's Soledad O'Brien pressed Congressman Jason Chaffetz to acknowledge that he joined House Republicans in voting to cut funding for embassy security.
Since the September attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, the right-wing media have attacked the Obama administration for supposedly not having enough security at the compound. That myth is undermined by a State Department explanation that "no reasonable security presence could have successfully fended" off the attack.
Chaffetz, a surrogate for Mitt Romney's presidential campaign who is helping to lead an investigation into the attack, appeared to discuss that investigation on CNN's Starting Point with Soledad O'Brien. During the interview, Chaffetz echoed the right-wing media talking point that security was insufficient in Benghazi. But O'Brien pointed out the fundamental hypocrisy in this argument by noting that Chaffetz, like other Republicans in the House, voted to cut funding for embassy security.
O'Brien asked: "Is it true that you voted to cut the funding for embassy security?" Chaffetz responded: "Absolutely. Look we have to make priorities and choices in this country."
SupperSalesman clearly should have been wearing a helmet for his Human Cannonball act.. .
There was never a cut to funding us military, DSS, or CIA protection. The funding cuts were to proposed increases to outside contractors of the native countries. You keep repeating the same lie.
There are thousands of troops on, or in the vicinity of the east coast of Africa. The President is free to assign any military units to any State Department location he pleases. Customarily that has been Marines specifically trained for that mission. It is the Obama administration that chose to pull military protection and replace that protection with Chevrolet Volts.
Supsalemgr wrote: It will be interesting to watch this circus unfold.
Well you make the 3rd or 4th clown today to crawl out of the car and wave that flag around... however..
The conservative media talking point that the White House abdicated its responsibility to secure the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, took a hit Wednesday when CNN's Soledad O'Brien pressed Congressman Jason Chaffetz to acknowledge that he joined House Republicans in voting to cut funding for embassy security.
Since the September attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, the right-wing media have attacked the Obama administration for supposedly not having enough security at the compound. That myth is undermined by a State Department explanation that "no reasonable security presence could have successfully fended" off the attack.
Chaffetz, a surrogate for Mitt Romney's presidential campaign who is helping to lead an investigation into the attack, appeared to discuss that investigation on CNN's Starting Point with Soledad O'Brien. During the interview, Chaffetz echoed the right-wing media talking point that security was insufficient in Benghazi. But O'Brien pointed out the fundamental hypocrisy in this argument by noting that Chaffetz, like other Republicans in the House, voted to cut funding for embassy security.
O'Brien asked: "Is it true that you voted to cut the funding for embassy security?" Chaffetz responded: "Absolutely. Look we have to make priorities and choices in this country."
SupperSalesman clearly should have been wearing a helmet for his Human Cannonball act.. .
Crock clearly lived up to his name with that post. There is plenty of money available if the D of S had wished to beef up security as requested. Another very weak attempt to "spin" away.
Tertius wrote:There was never a cut to funding us military, DSS, or CIA protection. The funding cuts were to proposed increases to outside contractors of the native countries. You keep repeating the same lie.
There are thousands of troops on, or in the vicinity of the east coast of Africa. The President is free to assign any military units to any State Department location he pleases. Customarily that has been Marines specifically trained for that mission. It is the Obama administration that chose to pull military protection and replace that protection with Chevrolet Volts.
You lie. There was no military protection. There was no request for Marines. There were no Marines. There never had been any Marines. If the request for security for the embassy in Tripoli had been granted, there still would have been no Marines. Marines were never a part of the picture.
None of this is a cabinet-level or an administration-level decision.
The request was to keep about a dozen diplomatic security workers at the embassy in Tripoli. Even if they had stayed in Tripoli, they wouldn't have done the Benghazi outpost any good. By the state department's own admission, if the Tripoli security had gone to Benghazi, they still wouldn't have been able to stop that attack.
Why don't you guys take your tin foil hats off and ease you way back into reality.
Tertius wrote:Our Benghazi consulate was guarded by unarmed Libyan contractors making $4.00 an hour. Even MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell said Biden lied during Thursday's debate. Biden said more than one time no one in the Obama administration knew of request for extra security by Ambassador Stevens and others. Mitchell noted the State Department knew "in real time," of the request and needs.
Clue: Biden and Obama are not "the State Department." People in the State Department knew of the request, not Clinton, Biden, or Obama.
It's kind of like watching you clowns make asses of yourselves again like you did over the Fast and Furious thing. How'd that work out for you?
A person of average intelligence would have learned something from that little fiasco . . . like not to cast common sense aside and imagine that every tiny decision made in Bumphukked, New Mexico, makes its way to Washington, to the attorney general or cabinet secretary, or to the White House.
lessthantolerant wrote:
What does burning a Quran/Koran have to do with cowardice? This whole line of thought is simply ridiculous. the man has his right to do whatever he wants with their bible just as you iberals do with Christian symbols.
Let's look at reality, what good has Islam actually ever done in its life as a religion? How does subjegation of women and murdering of non practicing muslims qualify in liberals minds as something to crow about?
Islam is a terrible cult which should be eradicated from the face of the earth.
It's funny that the hokiewoodchucks and lessthantolerants of the world are always yapping and trying to get other people to burn the Qurans etc...knowing full well that they themselves have no intention at all of doing the deed themselves, because of their cowardice and the fear of possible repercussions. It's probably why "Neil" hasn't answered the post yet, because, just putting his name and burning the Quran in the same post has him hiding under his bed as we speak.
Funny how you phrased your question ("Let's look at reality, what good has Islam actually ever done in its life "as a religion"?) "As a religion", about the same as other religions, as a people group, the list would be too long to mention.
Tertius wrote:There was never a cut to funding us military, DSS, or CIA protection. The funding cuts were to proposed increases to outside contractors of the native countries. You keep repeating the same lie.
There are thousands of troops on, or in the vicinity of the east coast of Africa. The President is free to assign any military units to any State Department location he pleases. Customarily that has been Marines specifically trained for that mission. It is the Obama administration that chose to pull military protection and replace that protection with Chevrolet Volts.
You lie. There was no military protection. There was no request for Marines. There were no Marines. There never had been any Marines. If the request for security for the embassy in Tripoli had been granted, there still would have been no Marines. Marines were never a part of the picture.
None of this is a cabinet-level or an administration-level decision.
The request was to keep about a dozen diplomatic security workers at the embassy in Tripoli. Even if they had stayed in Tripoli, they wouldn't have done the Benghazi outpost any good. By the state department's own admission, if the Tripoli security had gone to Benghazi, they still wouldn't have been able to stop that attack.
Why don't you guys take your tin foil hats off and ease you way back into reality.
