Agreed! It was quality scheduling that just flopped.

Agreed! It was quality scheduling that just flopped.
7-11Vrede too wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 5:07 pmGo:
(19)Iowa -2.5 @Iowa St, tight spread, I would have picked whichever was ranked higher.
Iowa won but missed he spread by 1.5.
(9)Florida -7.5 @Kentucky, better than many others in the top 10.
Florida beat the spread on a 76 yd run with 0:33 left while just trying to run out the clock.![]()
Kent St +35.5 @(8)Auburn, could be another Kent St massacre.
Auburn beats the spread by 3.5. Thanks for nothing, billy.pilgrim.
@(25)Virginia -7.5 Florida St, anyone but FSU.
Virginia wins, cool, but misses the spread by 0.5, arrrggghhh.
I'm confused. Are you saying that their "quality scheduling" flopped because one team wasn't as good as they were last year?
They didn't try to run it up. It's a little unusual for Gus to go up by more than 4 scores.Vrede too wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2019 11:24 pm7-11Vrede too wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 5:07 pmGo:
(19)Iowa -2.5 @Iowa St, tight spread, I would have picked whichever was ranked higher.
Iowa won but missed he spread by 1.5.
(9)Florida -7.5 @Kentucky, better than many others in the top 10.
Florida beat the spread on a 76 yd run with 0:33 left while just trying to run out the clock.![]()
Kent St +35.5 @(8)Auburn, could be another Kent St massacre.
Auburn beats the spread by 3.5. Thanks for nothing, billy.pilgrim.
@(25)Virginia -7.5 Florida St, anyone but FSU.
Virginia wins, cool, but misses the spread by 0.5, arrrggghhh.![]()
I dropped from 1st to a tie for 6th best season record.![]()
Now I'm confused. I'm saying that they tried to schedule a top tier, Power 5 opponent, Stanford, which is exactly what you've been demanding, and it's just bad luck that Stanford sucks this year after not sucking for many years.billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 11:32 amI'm confused. Are you saying that their "quality scheduling" flopped because one team wasn't as good as they were last year?
Silly me, I thought that quality scheduling meant scheduling 5 to 8 teams that consistently field teams equal to yours.
Let's be clear, if you play in a strong conference, you need a couple of easy non-conference games (I'll even stick up for bammer on this). If you play in a poor conference you need strong non-conference games.
Anything less cheapens the game.
I concede. UCF has a very good football team. Too bad they are so completely lacking in sportsmanship.
They are here to stay.
billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 11:34 amThey didn't try to run it up. It's a little unusual for Gus to go up by more than 4 scores.
And the band played toobilly.pilgrim wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2019 9:18 amThis is the sort of thing college sports are about, too bad catshit doesn't understandVrede too wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 7:47 pmThey've sold 50K t-shirts!!! Now it's not just the swag, fame and showing up the bullies. UT has offered him a full ride scholarship beginning in 2032. That makes me sniffle a little bit.billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:16 pmWay to go Tennessee, you did good.
https://www.mynews13.com/fl/orlando/new ... ssee-shirt
![]()
Speaking of waste:
Schools reportedly spent an average of $8,200 on hotel rooms before home games last season
College football coaches love controlling every element that they can in the lead up to a game in order to minimize distractions. As a result, it’s become common place for nearly every football team in the country to spend the night at a hotel before home games....
In 2018 alone, public schools spend a median of $44,000 on hotels and nearly $5 million total across some 109 programs according to the report. That included low spenders like Coastal Carolina (just $2,800 per game) to those rolling in cash like Texas A&M ($278,000 total, or nearly $40k per home game).
Remarkably the Aggies spent so much because the hotel they stay at requires a two-night minimum and they leave the rooms unoccupied for one of those nights....
There’s some interesting sortable data in the full report, which includes noting that the SEC spends the most rooms on average and the Big Ten the least.
So next time you see the buses pull up to your favorite team’s stadium on a Saturday in college football, just remember it cost a decent chunk of change for the school to house those kids in a hotel prior to the game.
There's an entire PA grade school that had an anti-bullying "Orange Day" last week, too.billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:42 pmAnd the band played too
https://abcnews4.com/news/nation-world/ ... -203713232
(8)Auburn +4 @(17)Texas A&M. Auburn higher ranked but NOT favored this time. A TAMU loss really hurts Clemson since it was likely the best team it will play until the ACC Championship or even a Bowl. Don’t let me down, billy.pilgrim.
Much better than last week when no ranked teams played a ranked team. This week will include 3 games between ranked teams.
Go Mich, Aub and Notre Dame (all underdogs)!billy.pilgrim wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 9:08 amMuch better than last week when no ranked teams played a ranked team. This week will include 3 games between ranked teams.
Vrede too wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 11:54 amNow we’re getting into more competitive games.
Go:
@USC +3.5 (10)Utah, Fri 09/20 09:00 PM. Yeah, Mormons are worse, especially if they’re in the top 10.
@(20)Boise St -8 Air Force. Blue field > blue yonder.
(11)Michigan +3 +3.5 @(13)Wisconsin. Tough choice, but it’ll be better for MD when MD crushes itif Michigan has the better record.
(23)California -1 +2 @Mississippi. Of course. Sweet, a 3 point gift.
(15)UCF -11 -12 @Pittsburgh. The streak continues. This might have been a semi-quality, nonconference Power 5 opponent some years.
(8)Auburn +4 +3.5 @(17)Texas A&M. Auburn higher ranked but NOT favored this time. A TAMU loss really hurts Clemson since it was likely the best team it will play until the ACC Championship or even a Bowl. Don’t let me down, billy.pilgrim.
SMU +9.5 @(25)TCU. Knock it out of the top 25.
(22)Washington -6.5 -6 @BYU. Duh.
(16)Oregon -9.5 -10.5 @Stanford. Climb back into it, though beating hapless Stanford won’t help that much.
Charlotte +41.5 +41 @(1)Clemson. Kill them, 49ers!That's more reasonable
.
@(12)Texas -7 -5.5 Oklahoma St. Austin > Stillwater.
(7)Notre Dame +13.5 +14 @(3)Georgia. Biggest game of the day. Victor has a good shot at the playoffs, vanquished not.
Colorado +7 +7.5 @(24)Arizona St.
Hmmm, Vegas widened the spread to 8.5, AZ may be swinging blue even in the POTUS race and, surprising to me, Tempe is a Dem city. Okay:
USC 30, UTAH 23, bye-bye top 10.
34-3. @(9)Florida vs Tennessee was offline for us. How embarrassing, that's usually reserved for FBS vs FCS, and not even all of those.neoplacebo wrote: ↑Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:21 pmTN is playing Florida today in Florida; I've been drinking early today.![]()
Bama beat the 39 point spread vs Southern Miss by 3 with a TD with 1:37 left, bastards. Got it correct - 16 others!Vrede too wrote: ↑Thu Sep 19, 2019 8:26 amGo:
(11)Michigan +3.5 @(13)Wisconsin. Tough choice, but it’ll be better for MD when MD crushes itif Michigan has the better record.
That was a rotten choice, and only 6 of us made it. The MD win won't count for as much.![]()
(23)California +2 @Mississippi. Of course. Sweet, a 3 point gift.
Pac 12 rules, SEC drools . . . by 1 foot, probably.
I start 4-2, tied for 9th. 2 players are 6-0.Vrede too wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2019 12:43 pmEmail from one of the pool admins:Really, Yahoo!? You’re making us bet on a 55-point spread for Alabama and NM State? Sheesh. I gotta factor just how pathetic the Aggies are against how big of a dick Nick Saben is? Great.No one ever went broke overestimating how big of a dick Nick Saban is, but Go Aggies!
Great run for the 1st score, billy.pilgrim!