Why Do You Support Obama? A Sincere Question.

[Guest]

Big Ugly here. Double Ugly for you Vrede. Just making my daily stop at the Tree Hugger Review. Thought all you Obama fans might like this if you dare look at it.

http://thehayride.com/2012/09/maybe-the ... dium=email

Wouldn't it be great if all of us could ask for more time to do what we couldn't do in the time allotted. Doesn't work that way in the real world and it shouldn't work that way for the President of our country but Obama keeps begging you to give him more time. I say, "time's up".

[Bungalow Bill]

Wouldn't it be great if Dumbya wasn't such a big screw-up that he wouldn't have left such
a huge economic mess to the next guy? But he was and he did. Obama had a good ad that
ran earlier that shows Romney repeating the same lamebrain stuff he now puts out that
he did when he was running for governor of Massachusetts--I know how to create jobs, blah,
blah, blah. His job creation record in Massachusetts was nothing to brag on. He knows how to
talk about creating jobs as a public servant, he just doesn't know how to do it, leaving aside
the fact that the nutters claim government can't create jobs. Hilarious

[Stinger]

You know, weenie Republicans have spent the last four years pretending that Bush never existed, like Obama caused the Great Recession that occurred before he was even elected, like Obama was responsible for the budget that Bush asked for and signed into law, and like the jobs lost because of the financial meltdown during the Bush administration were somehow Obama's fault.

When do you think the Republicans will ever grow the gonads to man up and admit that none of that was Obama's fault?

[Stinger]

Big Ugly here. Double Ugly for you Vrede. Just making my daily stop at the Tree Hugger Review. Thought all you Obama fans might like this if you dare look at it.

http://thehayride.com/2012/09/maybe-the ... dium=email

Wouldn't it be great if all of us could ask for more time to do what we couldn't do in the time allotted. Doesn't work that way in the real world and it shouldn't work that way for the President of our country but Obama keeps begging you to give him more time. I say, "time's up".

Wouldn't it be great if you could get in touch with reality. And you could have all the time in the world to get in touch with reality, but we all know it will never happen.

[Guest]

You know, weenie Republicans have spent the last four years pretending that Bush never existed, like Obama caused the Great Recession that occurred before he was even elected, like Obama was responsible for the budget that Bush asked for and signed into law, and like the jobs lost because of the financial meltdown during the Bush administration were somehow Obama's fault.

When do you think the Republicans will ever grow the gonads to man up and admit that none of that was Obama's fault?

About the same time the liberal pieces of crap grow a pair of gonads and man up that it was the liberal take over of congress in 2006 that caused the melt down. Stop crying will ya!

[Bungalow Bill]

So the current sloooow recovery is actually the result of the tea partiers elected in
2008. Sorry Charley, right or not, folks usually blame the president for a slow economy,
not the Congress.

[Guest]

Vrede, haven't run away from any military flubs because I haven't made any. Does no good to have an exchange with you especially when you do not know what you are talking about. Of course that covers just about everything. What was it the Detective used? Fence post I beleive.

BTW, how did Obama do last night? I'll drop by the Tree Hugger Review in a few days and catch up on all the excuses. Doesn't take long to catch up on this site. Do the libs here have a secret code for group hug. After last night you'll need one.

[Bungalow Bill]

I figured the nutters would put something up about the debate today. But they didn't wait
till today, they were right on it last night, with dipso's post of a piece from The Washington
Times which theorized that Obama gave about the worst debate performance in the history
of mankind, or some such thing. Yeah, The Washington Times, big surprise. Exaggeration
is in the nutjobbies' blood, both the big time nutters and the local ones:

"Without his taxpayer funded teleprompter and Soros backed advisors, he can't say a word
without exposing his black liberation theology, pro muslim, socialist agenda."

Wingnuts=Assholes Deluxe

[Guest]

Vrede, you are wrong on all counts but what's new.

For starters the B-52 is known as the BUFF. Big Ugly Fat F_ (well I thinker you know the rest).

I asked you if you knew we had "chems". I knew because I was certifed to employ them. Not all crewmembers are? Same with Nukes but you knew that didn't you. How is a rabbit, yeah a rabbit, like Bugs Bunny (that's for Banni), used when loaded chems are on alert? Is the US policy for chem employment offensive or defensive? C'om on, show us what you got.

Next time you visit the Naval Academy, if you can get through the gate, interpret the latin definition of the inscription on the wall of the main building - hint, near the Eagle, Globe, and Anchor. Get back to me after you have accomplished your link search.

Big Ugly was and still is the affectionate name of the F-4 among those who flew it early on. Rhino is another commonly used name among the flyers. Like Dirt Eagle (A/G primary mission) for the F-15E or Dark Gray and Light Gary for the F-15 A/A version. But you knew all of that didn't you? How about Lawn Dart for the F-16 and Ardvark for the F-111? Maybe Thud for the F-105 or Lead Sled.

I suggest you stay on the Tree Hugger Forum where your minions hang on every word you put to print. BTW, the threads on the commoner site are much shorter and to the point now that you have graced us with your departure. Take a que from Obama and don't engage someone who's been there and has the tee shirt.

[k9nanny]

Only those certified to deploy "chems" know they exist.
Got'cha. You're never over being surprised until you're dead.

[Tertius]

Obama's lies and calling every truth a lie have finely caught up with him. Obama is falling in the polls than the earth dropped on Jupiter.

[Wneglia]

Veterans Today: Foreign Cash Disqualifies Romney from Presidential Bid

Obama's Illegal Froeign Campaign Contributions

See also

[Wneglia]

Obama's Illegal Froeign Campaign Contributions

A new report obtained by Townhall from the non-partisan Government Accountability Institute...

"non-partisan"?

The Government Accountability Institute (GAI) is a "a new conservative investigative research organization" headed by Peter Schweizer, GAI president, author, and research fellow at the Hoover Institution...

>>> <<<

Could be that Obama is getting "Illegal Froeign Campaign Contributions" but the title you chose for your link is not justified by the article's content. It says:

...the Obama campaign has potentially violated federal election law by failing to prevent the use of fraudulent or foreign credit card transactions on the official Obama for America [OFA] donation webpage...

Then, it goes on to bemoan the lack of requirement to use a CVV code. No evidence of actual shenanigans is offered. Contrast this with the actual evidence of illegal foreign contributions to Mitten presented by Veterans Today, Fox News, the New York Times, and the Washington Post.

See also

>>> <<<

...Are these postings the duplicitous work of Romney supporters pretending to be Obama backers? Or just the postings of misinformed Obama supporters unfamiliar with U.S. election laws? The anonymous nature of the Internet makes it hard to say for sure...

It's a sure sign that an accusation is dubious when even Liarbart is compelled to offer caveats.

More from Liarbart:

...“That’s the point of our 108-page report,” said GAI President Peter Schweizer in an interview with Breitbart News. “The world of online campaign contributions is still the Wild West. Federal Election Commission laws have not kept up with technology. All that’s needed is a simple pop-up for foreign website visitors that asks individuals abroad to enter their military ID or Passport number. It’s not a perfect solution, but it’s a start.”

...“Bottom line: we are live in an iPod world with jukebox campaign laws,” said Mr. Schweizer. “It’s up to our leaders in Washington to update campaign laws to the dangers that come with our pixelated political reality.”

I agree. So who has most enthusiastically obstructed making campaign finance law more effective? The GOP, of course.

So investigate both candidates and parties and let the chips fall where they may.

[Guest]

Just in case some of you forgot what a real President looks like and thinks.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/OvN1jTkzXbY?rel=0

[Wneglia]

[Leo Lyons]

Just in case some of you forgot what a real President looks like and thinks.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/OvN1jTkzXbY?rel=0

Thanks for the reminder. Reagan had his bad moments, but kept his integrity intact; something that can't be said about the most recent past or this current administration.

Obama claims that Romney's debating performance was 'salesmanship'; of course it was.
Obama is getting desperate, Romney's getting cocky.

Now, in answer to the thread's title question: I don't.

[bannination]

<SNIP IMAGE>

You know I don't like that policy one bit, but on the opposite side he would be accused of being weak on terror if he didn't.

It's definitely a factor in my vote, but I don't see Romney being any different on this issue. Do you? If so Why?

[Wneglia]

So investigate both candidates and parties and let the chips fall where they may.

Fine with me, but the facts remain that your sources are biased, the title you chose for your link is not justified by the articles' content, the current evidence for Mitten malfeasance is greater and is presented by more credible sources (even Faux Noise), and it's your GOP that has been the strongest impediment to meaningful campaign finance reform.

Hey. I admit I'm biased. So you claim to be unbiased?

[Leo Lyons]

Obama: Re-election

[Wneglia]

Back to the Future