Officials in Surry County, North Carolina, voted to remove Coca-Cola machines from all government facilities in response to the beverage company CEO's remarks about Georgia's controversial new voting law.
The ban passed during a Board of Commissioners meeting on May 17 with a 3-2 vote as a direct response to Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey's comments calling the voting law "unacceptable" and "a step backwards."
Commissioner Ed Harris provided "TODAY" Digital with the copy of a letter he sent Quincey, calling out the company's "corporate political commentary favoring the Democratic party" and announcing the decision to remove Coca-Cola machines from government facilities....
Democracy-hating Surry County is adjacent to VA, is 90.40% White and votes 3 to 1 Repug. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surry_Cou ... h_Carolina
With only about 72K residents, I'm sure it's less than 20 machines. Coca-Cola has already earned more from the free PR. RepuQ county commissioners just aren't very smart. I'm going to buy a Coke, which I almost never drink, today.
Not related to Surry County and maybe not related to GA, but Coke's pro-democracy position has not hurt it:
Btw, 'KO' is a great market moniker. Pepsi is 'PEP', which is also pretty good.
Looks like the county is only hurting the local distributor and local vending machine leaser and are too stupid to realize it. We can certainly conclude from this that no county leaders have any relatives or any interest in soft drink or vending machine businesses. We can also conclude they are fascist nutjobs.
The only time Coke has fucked up was back when they changed the damn recipe and called it "new." The guy who was responsible now sells electric dog polishers in the remote regions of the Northwest Territory. Or else he's a senior vice president.
The only time Coke has fucked up was back when they changed the damn recipe and called it "new." The guy who was responsible now sells electric dog polishers in the remote regions of the Northwest Territory. Or else he's a senior vice president.
Well, while I'm certain the "guy who was responsible" didn't consider the ban as such, this mostly likely is in the best interest of public health.
Coca-Cola being about 99% sugar, with 1% made up of caffeine and coal tar based coloring.
The other potential benefit is that Georgia will consider this an act of war.
Looks like the county is only hurting the local distributor and local vending machine leaser and are too stupid to realize it. We can certainly conclude from this that no county leaders have any relatives or any interest in soft drink or vending machine businesses. We can also conclude they are fascist nutjobs.
Let me begin by saying that my remarks are addressed solely towards the 3 Commissioners, including Harris, that voted for the Coca-Cola ban, not towards the wiser minority. This article only IDed where Harris stands.
Let’s look at what the anti-democratic, racist majority has accomplished:
They’ve made Surry County a national laughingstock, an object of scorn and pity;
They’re too stupid to see the hypocrisy in whining about “out-of-control cancel culture” when in fact the Trumpette loser GA Repugs are desperately canceling legit voters, and the Surry County majority just canceled Coca-Cola;
The county is only hurting the local bottler and local vending machine leaser. Shame;
It may be unrelated, but Coke's pro-democracy position has certainly not hurt it:
Coca-Cola (KO) Outpaces Stock Market Gains https://news.yahoo.com/coca-cola-ko-out ... 09767.html
Coca-Cola has gotten tons of free national PR thanks to you nutjobs. Smart. I don’t drink sodas, but I went out and bought some. The Orange-Vanilla Coke ain’t half bad. Thanks!
If y’all had made it through high school you would have learned that government censors always, always, always lose. Keep up the good work.
I like it, but would have closed with "intestinally yours" or "growing strong in Christ."
"would have"? What's stopping you? You're closer to Surry County than I am. Fight for regional Coke! Please cc us.
I seem to have lost my affinity for that sort of thing over the past year or so. Or maybe I'm just weary of sending scathing evaluations and opinions to nutjobs who never respond or much less change their wingnut ways. Maybe if I had a new drug........
I seem to have lost my affinity for that sort of thing over the past year or so. Or maybe I'm just weary of sending scathing evaluations and opinions to nutjobs who never respond or much less change their wingnut ways. Maybe if I had a new drug........
"never respond"? You engineered several resignations and firings . You're lucky they don't respond with a knock on your door.
I seem to have lost my affinity for that sort of thing over the past year or so. Or maybe I'm just weary of sending scathing evaluations and opinions to nutjobs who never respond or much less change their wingnut ways. Maybe if I had a new drug........
"never respond"? You engineered several resignations and firings . You're lucky they don't respond with a knock on your door.
Maybe you're right......I think that if I had been the recipient of one of my "eat shit and die" missives, I'd certainly want to respond in some way. And I like to think that the large biohazard warning symbol I put on my door has an effect on who chooses to knock. Actually, the only time I've had to provide my name and address is when I send something to Marsha or Diana, and I feel sure neither of them want anything to do with me. I've actually considered making a trip to one of either of their local offices (neither has an office in my town) just to introduce myself and say something like "remember me?" But I decided that I'd rather be in a car wreck or undergo a second circumcision than enter a goddamn den of fools and boobs.
Maybe you're right......I think that if I had been the recipient of one of my "eat shit and die" missives, I'd certainly want to respond in some way. And I like to think that the large biohazard warning symbol I put on my door has an effect on who chooses to knock. Actually, the only time I've had to provide my name and address is when I send something to Marsha or Diana, and I feel sure neither of them want anything to do with me. I've actually considered making a trip to one of either of their local offices (neither has an office in my town) just to introduce myself and say something like "remember me?" But I decided that I'd rather be in a car wreck or undergo a second circumcision than enter a goddamn den of fools and boobs.
They're assholes, they get scores of "eat shit and die" missives weekly. Yours are of superior quality, but are not a unique category.
Maybe that's why my notes are tamer. I do give my name and addresses, though my real snail mail address is a POB, partly for situations like this. Learning my physical address probably isn't that hard for the determined, though. I never give out my phone # and just use 555-555-5555 if one is required, or 828-555-5555 if that doesn't work.
I don't visit offices and rarely call, even though I know it's more effective. Midnight graffiti would be tempting.
Yeah, I guess I take a sort of perverse pride in being one of the more prolific, astute, and consistent correspondents to the plethora of idiotic nutjobs I'm forced to read about and deal with on a daily basis. I advise you to not use the 555 phone number; it might be cause for automatic deletion of your comments to whatever nutjob you're trying to disparage. They might be nutjobs but that don't automatically make them stupid regarding other matters. I always give my own phone number and have never gotten a call rebutting my brutal appraisal of whatever it was my brutal appraisal was directed to. But they always have my email address, which they also refuse to take advantage of. I guess they're mostly the same sort of cowards who need a crowd of like minded gullible fools to affirm their own gullibility. But at least they know what I think and how to get in touch with me.
Yeah, I guess I take a sort of perverse pride in being one of the more prolific, astute, and consistent correspondents to the plethora of idiotic nutjobs I'm forced to read about and deal with on a daily basis. I advise you to not use the 555 phone number; it might be cause for automatic deletion of your comments to whatever nutjob you're trying to disparage. They might be nutjobs but that don't automatically make them stupid regarding other matters. I always give my own phone number and have never gotten a call rebutting my brutal appraisal of whatever it was my brutal appraisal was directed to. But they always have my email address, which they also refuse to take advantage of. I guess they're mostly the same sort of cowards who need a crowd of like minded gullible fools to affirm their own gullibility. But at least they know what I think and how to get in touch with me.
Thanks, I'll take that chance. I wouldn't mind a rebuttal call, but I don't want to get auto-placed on a robocall list. No biggie, phone #s are optional for a lot of my targets.
Interesting. We need an overhaul of election and campaign finance law and their enforcement, probably including a constitutional amendment. I'm not holding my breath thanks to Manchin.
Opps. Surry county morons back off their "Coke ban" at least in part because non of the machines or product was actually owned by CocaCola, and instead were owned by "Coca Cola Consolidated" a Charlotte based bottler with no ownership tie to CocaCola company. (And a former client). CCC has a "presence" in Surry county, employing 37 people some of whom would have been adversely affected by the RepuQ "cancellation." Idiots.
Opps. Surry county morons back off their "Coke ban" at least in part because non of the machines or product was actually owned by CocaCola, and instead were owned by "Coca Cola Consolidated" a Charlotte based bottler with no ownership tie to CocaCola company. (And a former client). CCC has a "presence" in Surry county, employing 37 people some of whom would have been adversely affected by the RepuQ "cancellation." Idiots.
Opps. Surry county morons back off their "Coke ban" at least in part because non of the machines or product was actually owned by CocaCola, and instead were owned by "Coca Cola Consolidated" a Charlotte based bottler with no ownership tie to CocaCola company. (And a former client). CCC has a "presence" in Surry county, employing 37 people some of whom would have been adversely affected by the RepuQ "cancellation." Idiots.
Looks like the county is only hurting the local distributor and local vending machine leaser and are too stupid to realize it. We can certainly conclude from this that no county leaders have any relatives or any interest in soft drink or vending machine businesses. We can also conclude they are fascist nutjobs.
Opps. Surry county morons back off their "Coke ban" at least in part because non of the machines or product was actually owned by CocaCola, and instead were owned by "Coca Cola Consolidated" a Charlotte based bottler with no ownership tie to CocaCola company. (And a former client). CCC has a "presence" in Surry county, employing 37 people some of whom would have been adversely affected by the RepuQ "cancellation." Idiots.
Looks like the county is only hurting the local distributor and local vending machine leaser and are too stupid to realize it. We can certainly conclude from this that no county leaders have any relatives or any interest in soft drink or vending machine businesses. We can also conclude they are fascist nutjobs.
Ummm, he might want to check with a real lawyer on that - if he knows one.
... "I will veto Article 10 of the budget passed by the legislature. Article 10 funds the legislative branch," Abbott tweeted Monday. "No pay for those who abandon their responsibilities. Stay tuned." ...
I think he can do that, but it would affect everyone in the Leg on down to janitors, wouldn't take effect until Sept, and vetoes can be overridden.
... According to the Texas Tribune, the governor’s veto could affect the paychecks of not only the state’s lawmakers but their staff members and the budgets of legislative agencies....
State Democrats objected to Senate Bill 7, legislation that would severely suppress the vote in Texas by limiting voting hours, eliminating 24-hour polling stations and setting restrictions on access to mail-in voting.
The Texas Tribune also points out that the constitutionality of Abbott’s unprecedented veto has come into question and was condemned by the House Democratic Caucus Chair Chris Turner of Grand Prairie, who called the action an “abuse of power.”
“Texas has a governor, not a dictator,” Turner said in a statement. “The tyrannical veto of the legislative branch is the latest indication that [Abbott] is simply out of control.”
Texas legislators make $600 per month plus a $221 per diem each day the legislature is in session.