Building 7 Explained - Take that trufers.
-
- Captain
- Posts: 5592
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
- Location: Hendersonville
- Contact:
- O Really
- Admiral
- Posts: 23182
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm
Re: Building 7 Explained - Take that trufers.
Naa, there's always another layer in the loonies' onion.
- rstrong
- Captain
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am
- Location: Winnipeg, MB
Re: Building 7 Explained - Take that trufers.
Yup. They like to claim that "WTC7 is not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report." But they point to a report on the events leading up to the attack, where the attack itself only gets a brief mention at the end. When you mention the NIST Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, they run away.O Really wrote:Naa, there's always another layer in the loonies' onion.
They like to claim that "no other steel-structure buildings have ever collapsed from fire alone." Of course the WTC buildings had a great deal of structural damage BEFORE the fires. And there is in fact a long list of steel-structure buildings collapsed from fire alone.
And then there's their "free fall" fallacies and hyper-dishonest "pull" claims.
- Stinger
- Sub-Lieutenant
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: Building 7 Explained - Take that trufers.
You don't really think that facts and rational explanations will satisfy the gullible loons who fall for these conspiracies, do you?
I mean, look at how many con loons who are gullible enough to keep falling for Obama/Kenya stuff.
I mean, look at how many con loons who are gullible enough to keep falling for Obama/Kenya stuff.