O Really wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 1:10 pm
Nobody was talking about proportion. We were discussing number. Read your original comment again, and try again on the question.
Why talk about "number" when it is irrelevant to electoral result?
Remember, in a Democracy, MAJORITY RULES.
If one county has more inhabitants than another, it's more than likely that a particular aligned subset will have more members in the larger county than in the smaller county.
Other than that, I'm tired of explaining what should already be clear to most adults.
O Really wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 1:10 pm
Nobody was talking about proportion. We were discussing number. Read your original comment again, and try again on the question.
Why talk about "number" when it is irrelevant to electoral result?
Remember, in a Democracy, MAJORITY RULES.
If one county has more inhabitants than another, it's more than likely that a particular aligned subset will have more members in the larger county than in the smaller county.
Other than that, I'm tired of explaining what should already be clear to most adults.
Ulysses wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 2:16 pm
I have lied and cowarded about NOTHING.
You are a fucking asshole.
You moved the goalposts to cover your incompetence.
It's nothing new for you.
You do nothing here but lie like a rug.
And you're nothing but a pitiful pre adolescent who cries mommy more than any poster I've ever seen on any forum.
I'm sure you're proud of yourself. Give yourself a pat on the back and tell yourself how awesome you are whilst your cats lick their privates in applause.
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000000101010202020303010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.
Ulysses wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 2:16 pm
I have lied and cowarded about NOTHING.
You are a fucking asshole.
You moved the goalposts to cover your incompetence.
It's nothing new for you.
You do nothing here but lie like a rug.
And you're nothing but a pitiful pre adolescent who cries mommy more than any poster I've ever seen on any forum.
I'm sure you're proud of yourself. Give yourself a pat on the back and tell yourself how awesome you are whilst your cats lick their privates in applause.
Sluggo must enjoy eating dog shit three times a day.
Vrede too wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 9:53 am... As usual, Useless desperately deflects from the stupidity of his own post and even cowers from my post making O Really's point first by deleting it (restored now). Plus, he's stupid enough to think he'll get away with it. What a pussy!
Then, the cowardly moron continues with his English, comprehension and arithmetic-challenged dissembling even after being called out by O Really. Again, the "Faux News constituency" is GREATER in the Bay Area than it is in neoplacebo's eastern TN. What the majority of folks in the Bay Area watch is irrelevant to Useless' OP falsehood. What's so hard to understand about that?
Now, watch him cower some more. He doesn't have the stones to admit error, ever....
As predicted.
O Really wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 10:47 amThe phrase "hoist by his own petard" comes to mind.
I'm just wondering who ever disputed that the majority of voters in the Bay Area are not Trumpists. I also wonder what's wrong with saying, "yeah, I know I said "considerable Faux News constituency," but I was thinking of electoral majorities."
Perpetual pussy, and too stupid to get that we can all see it.
neoplacebo wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 2:03 pmShit sticks. I blame myself for the whole goddamn thing. I had no way of knowing that me asserting a "considerable constituency" would result in Useless going over the high side again.
Remember that this is the thin-skinned moron that takes offense on behalf of CA if we post about our regional flooding.
GoCubsGo wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 2:15 pmLies and cowering and deflecting are his thing.
GoCubsGo wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 2:19 pmYou moved the goalposts to cover your incompetence.
It's nothing new for you.
Yep. The Useless stupidity that he's now on his 3rd page of cowering from, not a peep about proportions:
Ulysses wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 9:34 pmOut here in NoCal you have to go to the hills to find a considerable Faux News constituency....
I've got it, "considerable" has too many syllables for him.
Ulysses wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 3:04 pm(posts: )
(signature: obsessed butthurt )
Awww. , Useless. So much for "Ignored". You fail again. Plus, Useless, you've been busted too many times for anyone to believe you're not reading my posts, anyhow. It's just your excuse for cowering. Awww.
The Truth Will Set You Free, But First It Will Piss You Off
-- Gloria Steinem
1312. ETTD. 86 47.
So here's your question: Are there more probable Faux News constituents in Alameda County CA or Sullivan County TN?
Only honest answers would include:
(a) Alameda County
(b) Sullivan County
(c) I don't know.
O Really wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 8:00 pm
In case anybody forgot the question, it was:
So here's your question: Are there more probable Faux News constituents in Alameda County CA or Sullivan County TN?
Only honest answers would include:
(a) Alameda County
(b) Sullivan County
(c) I don't know.
Why do you insist on disregarding the percentage of Faux News constituents in a CA county with over 1.5 million residents, and a much smaller country in the boondocks of TN?
No one EVER challenged the proportionality that you deflected to, pussy. Why do you insist on disregarding the fact of a larger "Faux News constituency (your words)" in the Bay Area than in eastern TN?
We are ALL laughing at your cowardly stupidity. We KNOW that YOU are "really this stupid and stubborn".
Last edited by Vrede too on Sat Mar 26, 2022 11:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Truth Will Set You Free, But First It Will Piss You Off
-- Gloria Steinem
1312. ETTD. 86 47.
O Really wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 8:00 pm
In case anybody forgot the question, it was:
So here's your question: Are there more probable Faux News constituents in Alameda County CA or Sullivan County TN?
Only honest answers would include:
(a) Alameda County
(b) Sullivan County
(c) I don't know.
Why do you insist on disregarding the percentage of Faux News constituents in a CA county with over 1.5 million residents, and a much smaller country in the boondocks of TN?
Are you really this stupid and stubborn?
There was nothing in your original comment about percentage, nor am I disregarding percentage. Of course the percentage is lower in Alameda. That's not the issue. The issue is how many. Are there more Faux News constituents in Alameda County or Sullivan County?
No one EVER challenged the proportionality that you deflected to, pussy. Why do you insist on disregarding the fact of a larger "Faux News constituency (your words)" in the Bay Area than in eastern TN?
We are ALL laughing at your cowardly stupidity. We KNOW that YOU are "really this stupid and stubborn".
O Really wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 8:00 pm
In case anybody forgot the question, it was:
So here's your question: Are there more probable Faux News constituents in Alameda County CA or Sullivan County TN?
Only honest answers would include:
(a) Alameda County
(b) Sullivan County
(c) I don't know.
Why do you insist on disregarding the percentage of Faux News constituents in a CA county with over 1.5 million residents, and a much smaller country in the boondocks of TN?
Are you really this stupid and stubborn?
There was nothing in your original comment about percentage, nor am I disregarding percentage. Of course the percentage is lower in Alameda. That's not the issue. The issue is how many. Are there more Faux News constituents in Alameda County or Sullivan County?
I regard your inquiry as fatuous, inconclusive, and a total waste of time.
O Really wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 8:00 pm
In case anybody forgot the question, it was:
So here's your question: Are there more probable Faux News constituents in Alameda County CA or Sullivan County TN?
Only honest answers would include:
(a) Alameda County
(b) Sullivan County
(c) I don't know.
Why do you insist on disregarding the percentage of Faux News constituents in a CA county with over 1.5 million residents, and a much smaller country in the boondocks of TN?
Are you really this stupid and stubborn?
There was nothing in your original comment about percentage, nor am I disregarding percentage. Of course the percentage is lower in Alameda. That's not the issue. The issue is how many. Are there more Faux News constituents in Alameda County or Sullivan County?
I regard your inquiry as fatuous, inconclusive, and a total waste of time.
Run away useless
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”
O Really wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 8:00 pm
In case anybody forgot the question, it was:
So here's your question: Are there more probable Faux News constituents in Alameda County CA or Sullivan County TN?
Only honest answers would include:
(a) Alameda County
(b) Sullivan County
(c) I don't know.
Why do you insist on disregarding the percentage of Faux News constituents in a CA county with over 1.5 million residents, and a much smaller country in the boondocks of TN?
Are you really this stupid and stubborn?
There was nothing in your original comment about percentage, nor am I disregarding percentage. Of course the percentage is lower in Alameda. That's not the issue. The issue is how many. Are there more Faux News constituents in Alameda County or Sullivan County?
I regard your inquiry as fatuous, inconclusive, and a total waste of time.
, Useless. So much for "Ignored". You fail again. Plus, Useless, you've been busted too many times for anyone to believe you're not reading my posts, anyhow. It's just your excuse for cowering. Awww.
