neoplacebo wrote: Sat Apr 23, 2022 11:41 pmWhen I was in the navy we used to see a hamster hanging around the docks. It was weird....didn't have any legs.
That was a camp range. You just thought it was a hamster because it was so small and Useless.
The Truth Will Set You Free, But First It Will Piss You Off
-- Gloria Steinem
1312. ETTD. 86 47.
Awww. , Useless. So much for "Ignored". You fail again. Plus, Useless, you've been busted too many times for anyone to believe you're not reading my posts, anyhow. It's just your excuse for cowering. Awww.
The Truth Will Set You Free, But First It Will Piss You Off
-- Gloria Steinem
1312. ETTD. 86 47.
Awww. , Useless. So much for "Ignored". You fail again. Plus, Useless, you've been busted too many times for anyone to believe you're not reading my posts, anyhow. It's just your excuse for cowering. Awww.
True, but he got all huffy earlier and put me on ignore, but he keeps answering the content of my new posts within minutes. It's silly.
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”
I prefer to observe you to be so far below your resolutions. Vrede's right, it's great fun catching you lie about reading our posts
No, I *could* read his posts, but I don't.
That's a bridge to hell I won't cross.
So why do you respond to us almost immediately? Seems like you ability to ignore things is as inadequate as you are in general.
You still don't get it. Maybe you never will get it.
It takes extra effort to respond to YOU, as I have to click extra on your posts to display them. Normally they are hidden for somoone on ignore.
In the case of V-Bot, I simply do not click on his posts. Dont' want to see them. I cannot prevent seeing them, however, when someone (usually Sicko who is immune from being on a foes list) quotes V-bot. I can't prevent that. Most of the time I'll not respond to his crap, but occasionally he needs to be taught a lesson. But I do not deliberately read any of his posts. I cannot help seeing them though when Sicko quotes them.
Please try to understand. I'm getting tired of explaining how this works.
I don't know if I've ever been on ignore. As far as I'm concerned, there's just too many things going on for someone to institute any sort of ignore policy. Hell, it's self defeating. Besides, the opportunity to ignore stuff is when the stuff is initially presented or when you're first confronted with it. That's when you go "well, goddamn, look at this" (not ignoring) or "fuck that stuff" (ignoring). There's just no way in hell you can ignore something in advance or even come back and pretend to ignore it after the fact. The key to it is this: even when the past tense of the word "ignore" is used, its use refers back to the initial instant when the thing was ignored, whether that was two minutes ago or fifty years ago. And that's how ignore works in this goddamn world.
neoplacebo wrote: Sun Apr 24, 2022 2:51 pm
I don't know if I've ever been on ignore. As far as I'm concerned, there's just too many things going on for someone to institute any sort of ignore policy. Hell, it's self defeating. Besides, the opportunity to ignore stuff is when the stuff is initially presented or when you're first confronted with it. That's when you go "well, goddamn, look at this" (not ignoring) or "fuck that stuff" (ignoring). There's just no way in hell you can ignore something in advance or even come back and pretend to ignore it after the fact. The key to it is this: even when the past tense of the word "ignore" is used, its use refers back to the initial instant when the thing was ignored, whether that was two minutes ago or fifty years ago. And that's how ignore works in this goddamn world.
I shall simply ignore your meandering musings on the various meanings of the word "ignore".
neoplacebo wrote: Sun Apr 24, 2022 3:18 pm
There is only one meaning described. There is no other meaning. Are you now beginning to see your dilemma? Remember; only one.
neoplacebo wrote: Sun Apr 24, 2022 3:18 pm
There is only one meaning described. There is no other meaning. Are you now beginning to see your dilemma? Remember; only one.
It's not my dilemma.
It's BRD's dilemma.
BRD really only has one dilemma.
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000000101010202020303010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.
neoplacebo wrote: Sun Apr 24, 2022 3:18 pm
There is only one meaning described. There is no other meaning. Are you now beginning to see your dilemma? Remember; only one.
, Useless. So much for "Ignored". You fail again. Plus, Useless, you've been busted too many times for anyone to believe you're not reading my posts, anyhow. It's just your excuse for cowering. Awww.
)