GoCubsGo wrote: Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:20 pmThe ref guy in the booth said nyet.Vrede too wrote: Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:06 pm
Al and the bigot disagreed with you. I didn't study it myself.
Something about how a stride for stride wasn't going to be called this year or something. I thought the receiver was initiating contact.
It was INT #2, indeed by A.Samuel, 4th & 7 at LAC 33 (10:02 - 1st), led to a FG. Again, I didn't review it myself. I googled and didn't see immediate whining, so maybe you're correct.GoCubsGo wrote: Sun Jan 15, 2023 12:14 amAre we talking about the same play? Where they called PI on Samuels and picked up the flag?Vrede too wrote: Sat Jan 14, 2023 11:51 pmI wasn't talking about an end zone play, and I don't think they review 1st quarter INTs for PI, just to make sure it was an INT, or do you mean the NBC analyst?
Stunning, 0-27 to 31-30! Trevor got the last laugh, and Urban is crying too hard to pay attention to the lap dance he's getting.
Who did you mean by "The ref guy in the booth"?