Of course, that's why he's the first to lose out in the primaries.
Marriage Equality Is a Conservative Cause
By JON HUNTSMAN • February 21, 2013
But it’s difficult to get people even to consider your reform ideas if they think, with good reason, you don’t like or respect them. Building a winning coalition to tackle the looming fiscal and trust deficits will be impossible if we continue to alienate broad segments of the population. We must be happy warriors who refuse to tolerate those who want Hispanic votes but not Hispanic neighbors. We should applaud states that lead on reforming drug policy. And, consistent with the Republican Party’s origins, we must demand equality under the law for all Americans.
While serving as governor of Utah, I pushed for civil unions and expanded reciprocal benefits for gay citizens. I did so not because of political pressure—indeed, at the time 70 percent of Utahns were opposed—but because as governor my role was to work for everybody, even those who didn’t have access to a powerful lobby. Civil unions, I believed, were a practical step that would bring all citizens more fully into the fabric of a state they already were—and always had been—a part of.
That was four years ago. Today we have an opportunity to do more: conservatives should start to lead again and push their states to join the nine others that allow all their citizens to marry. I’ve been married for 29 years. My marriage has been the greatest joy of my life. There is nothing conservative about denying other Americans the ability to forge that same relationship with the person they love.
I wonder why Hunstman's marriage isn't "threatened" by gay marriage.
Of course, Jindal -- the man who said Republicans need to stop being the stupid party -- has rejected this argument and supports "traditional" marriage.
Of course, that's why he's the first to lose out in the primaries.
Marriage Equality Is a Conservative Cause
By JON HUNTSMAN • February 21, 2013
..There is nothing conservative about denying other Americans the ability to forge that same relationship with the person they love.
I wonder why Hunstman's marriage isn't "threatened" by gay marriage.
Of course, Jindal -- the man who said Republicans need to stop being the stupid party -- has rejected this argument and supports "traditional" marriage.
Go figure.
There's a bit of difference in love and perverted lust. Go figure.
Having your marriage "threatened" is not the real issue; having your kids taught that being a diggzucker or a litslicker is "normal behavior" is the threat to common decency. Homosexuals are a blight on the human race.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!
homerfobe wrote:...having your kids taught that being a diggzucker or a litslicker is "normal behavior"...
It is, for billions of straights. Maybe by the time you get out of Jr. High you'll receive the former and try the latter. You fail human sexuality, again.
So you're saying that humans should revert their sexuality to that of a dog? Which of those two above describe you?
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!
Of course, that's why he's the first to lose out in the primaries.
Marriage Equality Is a Conservative Cause
By JON HUNTSMAN • February 21, 2013
..There is nothing conservative about denying other Americans the ability to forge that same relationship with the person they love.
I wonder why Hunstman's marriage isn't "threatened" by gay marriage.
Of course, Jindal -- the man who said Republicans need to stop being the stupid party -- has rejected this argument and supports "traditional" marriage.
Go figure.
There's a bit of difference in love and perverted lust. Go figure.
Having your marriage "threatened" is not the real issue; having your kids taught that being a diggzucker or a litslicker is "normal behavior" is the threat to common decency. Homosexuals are a blight on the human race.
There's a bit of difference between normal people, gay or straight, and sick phukks like you. Whatever "threat" you imagine for our children is not nearly as bad as having pedophilia forced on them by some of your peers. No gay person is as big a blight on the human race as you are.
See if you can't post something worthy of a troll instead of the stupid shyte you post.
Vrede wrote:"revert"? Straight humans have been getting or receiving blow jobs and cunnilingus like forever. I'm not surprised that you're too immature to have ever tried either. Don't worry, even assholes and blockheads get some eventually.
I think his asshole is just aching to get some . . . .
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
"...more than six in ten Americans view the Republican party as “out of touch with the American people” while a majority (52 percent) believe the party is “too extreme.”
And the Republican numbers about themselves are rotten, too!
Boatrocker wrote:I think his asshole is just aching to get some . . . .
The "his" emphasized above refers to you. I'm [not very]sorry you're so achingly fucking stupid that you can't grasp that. I left myself open to nothing. But swing away; even a blind, one-armed batter will clip one every now and then.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
Buttcracker wrote:I think his asshole is just aching to get some . . . .
The "his" emphasized above refers to you. I'm [not very]sorry you're so achingly fucking stupid that you can't grasp that. I left myself open to nothing. But swing away; even a blind, one-armed batter will clip one every now and then.
Oh gee, my bad. I could have sworn you were referring to you as being my asshole. I'm [not very] sorry you're so achingly fucking stupid that you couldn't grasp that. You fail comprehension again and again.
Boatrocker wrote:I think his asshole is just aching to get some . . . .
The "his" emphasized above refers to you. I'm [not very]sorry you're so achingly fucking stupid that you can't grasp that. I left myself open to nothing. But swing away; even a blind, one-armed batter will clip one every now and then.
That's the only thing Homo can ever come up with -- "I know you are, but what am I?" rubber-ball-glue responses.
That's why he flunked out of troll school. Sometimes, just someone's stupidity will piss you off -- like Butt Ugly -- but this clown's so pathetic that he can't even piss anyone off.
Homo is really an interesting persona. He despises homosexuals, but instead of avoiding any association with those he detests, he focuses totally on them and his dislike of them. Assuming he's right that homosexuals are the spawn of the Devil, there are still lots of straight people who might fit that definition. He seems to have no real problem with rapists, murderers, or even pedophiles - as long as the pedophiles are heteros. Of all the really warped people in the world (by somebody's definition), he seems only to hate the homosexuals. Not that he's likely to admit he has a problem, but it would definitely be fun to hear what a real shrink had to say to his colleagues after his/her first session with Homo.
O Really wrote:Homo is really an interesting persona. He despises homosexuals, but instead of avoiding any association with those he detests, he focuses totally on them and his dislike of them. Assuming he's right that homosexuals are the spawn of the Devil, there are still lots of straight people who might fit that definition. He seems to have no real problem with rapists, murderers, or even pedophiles - as long as the pedophiles are heteros. Of all the really warped people in the world (by somebody's definition), he seems only to hate the homosexuals. Not that he's likely to admit he has a problem, but it would definitely be fun to hear what a real shrink had to say to his colleagues after his/her first session with Homo.
He's the very definition of "latent."
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
O Really wrote:Homo is really an interesting persona. He despises homosexuals, but instead of avoiding any association with those he detests, he focuses totally on them and his dislike of them. Assuming he's right that homosexuals are the spawn of the Devil, there are still lots of straight people who might fit that definition. I haven't dealt with that subject, but you're correct.
He seems to have no real problem with rapists, murderers, or even pedophiles - as long as the pedophiles are heteros. Of all the really warped people in the world (by somebody's definition), he seems only to hate the homosexuals. Another "opps" for you. Perhaps you missed where I posted this in another thread: Any adult that is sexually attracted to children is not fit to live in any society. If found guilty of screwing children, they should be given the death penalty; swiftly. Sandusky should have been buried long ago..
Not that he's likely to admit he has a problem, but it would definitely be fun to hear what a real shrink had to say to his colleagues after his/her first session with Homo. I think that would depend on whether the shrink is anti or pro queer. I just don't like queers; no problem.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!
