are Bored With Each Other! 
ain't interested with bitchin' back and forth with each other; 
Leo Lyons wrote:The Moonbats
I posted a comment in another thread at 3:13 to day, logged back in at 7:55pm. Mine was the last post!
It appears that the liberal moonbats
if there ain't no "cons" to belittle, they ain't interested in talkin' at all!! Y'all funny.
Just as you're bored without each other's company wherein you have someone to always agree with you?rstrong wrote:Yes, Leo. We need you and the other neocons. It's just like how the Harlem Globetrotters would be bored and boring without the Washington Generals.
I don't try to entangle myself with your same old boring rhetoric, so I don't keep up with what you're absorbing from the "faux news fairy tale" department. You all scream about Fox news; sure as hell are a lot of you watching it! You mistake me for Stinger; or someone else. I don't post from Fox News.billy.pilgrim wrote:I have been in several discussions where some or most liberals disagreed with me. I enjoyed the disagreement; the opinions discussed appeared to be genuine, rather than your tired old regurgitation of faux news fairy tales and horror stories
I did light a candle.....under y'all asses!Vrede wrote:Leo, there are multiple current threads on a variety of topics. All you could manage today is a little Catholic-bashing and so-so joke, a couple of mediocre (generously) contributions to the QM thread, and this gripe. Better to light a candle . . .
Got you stirred up big time! Like you, I find the "variety of topics" you refer to be boring and one-sided; therefore I don't bother to post any comments. The most entertaining are the threads that offer a little entertainment, such as you and your buds taking on Homer and whoever else from the con ranks is left for you to belittle. You dingleberry!Vrede wrote:Congrats on the new boyfriend! You make a cute couple.Leo Lyons wrote:
:-0?> That's a double-exposure photo....thus:
Leo Lyons wrote:I did light a candle.....under y'all asses!
Obsessed. You taking notes from homie?Vrede wrote:If you say so . . . now it looks like you've got a boy toy on the side, too.
Soooo....why did you show up?Stinger wrote:
Leo Lyons wrote:
Soooo....why did you show up?
I've showed up many times and avoided this thread because it was so desperately lame. The "light a candle.....under y'all asses!" delusion was too funny not to comment on. You barely got any response at all. Light a candle? Under "y'all" asses?
That pic is funnier than those Kool-Aid Kuties you have an aficionado for.
I have an "aficionado" for? ROTFLMAO!!!!
Coming from you and "y'all" asses, that was just precious.
Soooo....why did you show up?
I've showed up many times and avoided this thread because it was so desperately lame.
Just as your pic said...another dumbass. Thanks for your honest admission.
The "light a candle.....under y'all asses!" delusion was too funny not to comment on. You barely got any response at all. Light a candle? Under "y'all" asses?
Comprehension much? That wasn't a typo. "y'all asses, you asses, you bunch of asses, etc." Wasn't especially looking for any responses, but the three biggest asses brayed the loudest, as predicted!
HEE HAW!
That pic is funnier than those Kool-Aid Kuties you have an aficionado for.
I have an "aficionado" for? ROTFLMAO!!!!
I bet you had to look that up. Don't hurt your ass, you ain't no fun without it!
Coming from you and "y'all" asses, that was just precious.
You had no part in my original post, but you did fit right in, didn't you? As predicted.
Vrede takes all his boy toys on his side.Leo Lyons wrote:Obsessed. You taking notes from homie?Vrede wrote:If you say so . . . now it looks like you've got a boy toy on the side, too.
Leo Lyons wrote:
Soooo....why did you show up?
I've showed up many times and avoided this thread because it was so desperately lame.
Just as your pic said...another dumbass. Thanks for your honest admission.
That was clearly referring to you and your recurring delusion that you ever say anything significant enough to get anyone riled up. Since it was my first post on this thread, the "this bullshit AGAIN" clearly referred to you and your quote. Sorry about your continued illiteracy. Thanks for your honest stupidity.
The "light a candle.....under y'all asses!" delusion was too funny not to comment on. You barely got any response at all. Light a candle? Under "y'all" asses?
Comprehension much? That wasn't a typo. "y'all asses, you asses, you bunch of asses, etc." Wasn't especially looking for any responses, but the three biggest asses brayed the loudest, as predicted!
HEE HAW!
Thank you for your dishonest stupidity. Your mistake is in thinking everyone's as dumb as you and will fall for your stupid explanations. The phrase is "lighting a fire under your ass." Your attempt was to reuse Vrede's candle as in "lighting a candle under YOUR ass." Notice the possessive "YOUR." You screwed up by not making "y'all" possessive, and now you're too chickenshit to admit it. Good luck getting someone to believe your "But I really meant lighting a candle under 'you asses.'"
Good ol' Lyin Leo. As consistent as ever.
That pic is funnier than those Kool-Aid Kuties you have an aficionado for.
I have an "aficionado" for? ROTFLMAO!!!!
I bet you had to look that up. Don't hurt your ass, you ain't no fun without it!
No, Dumbass!!!! The "ROTFLMAO!!!!" should have been a clue.
I don't have to look it up. Unlike you, I know what it means, and unlike you, I use words correctly.
An afficionado (aficionada) is a person, you dumbass. Here, I'll look it up for you:
aficionado: a person who likes, knows about, and appreciates a usually fervently pursued interest or activity : devotee <aficionados of the bullfight> <movie aficionados>
So, your attempt at a more impressive vocabulary ended up an epic fail of more of your illiteracy. I have "a person" for Kool-Aid Kuties?
And then you double down on your illiteracy by suggesting that I have to look it up.
Thanks for the laughs.
Coming from you and "y'all" asses, that was just precious.
You had no part in my original post,.
No, it was too lame and pointless. I didn't respond until you posted your recurring delusion.
but you did fit right in, didn't you? As predicted.
Sorry, but you didn't predict that I would come in and ridicule your delusion. Just another desperate and failed attempt to save Lyin' Leo's face. The only thing predictable is your continued dishonesty and stupidity ... and your continued entertainment value.
Actually queers don't have rights as queers. They have rights as citizens. As do rednecks and homophobes. Legal recognition and enforcement of those rights is more likely what Vrede's looking for.homerfobe wrote:Vrede takes all his boy toys on his side.Leo Lyons wrote:Obsessed. You taking notes from homie?Vrede wrote:If you say so . . . now it looks like you've got a boy toy on the side, too.
Actually I get my notes from Vrede. He's the expert in affairs of queers and their rights.
A friggin' queer and it's supporters are an insult to society. Period.Vrede wrote:Once again, homerfobe makes the dumb mistake of thinking that suggesting that a tolerant civil rights and equality supporter, whether gay or straight, is gay will be taken as an insult.
Left something out didn't you?Stinger wrote:An afficionado (aficionada) is a person, you dumbass. Here, I'll look it up for you:
aficionado: a person who likes, knows about, and appreciates a usually fervently pursued interest or activity : devotee <aficionados of the bullfight> <movie aficionados>
So, your attempt at a more impressive vocabulary ended up an epic fail of more of your illiteracy. I have "a person" for Kool-Aid Kuties?
LMAO... It's hard to tell which pic is more gay..Leo Lyons wrote:You dingleberry!Vrede wrote:Congrats on the new boyfriend! You make a cute couple.Leo Lyons wrote:
.. nttawwt ... Your avatar is the one with it's ass up in the air; now drop that 'r' from your first name.....(opps! somebody done done that!)Crock Hunter wrote:LMAO... It's hard to tell which pic is more gay..
Who cares? I made my point. Are you Stinger's spokesman now?Vrede wrote:An "afficionado" is a person. You used it improperly, one can't have (a person) for pics. Arguing with Stinger that you used it correctly is silly, "you dumbass".Leo Lyons wrote:...That pic is funnier than those Kool-Aid Kuties you have an aficionado for.
Nothing to man up to. You got my point, it pissed you off, you're trying to blow it out of proportion by snickering at me. I'm also getting entertainment by your attempting to belittle and prove how much more intelligent you think you are.Vrede wrote: If I were you I would have just manned-up and posted, "Oops, I meant: have an affinity for," but your way is much more entertaining for me. Thank you.
As I said "I'm also getting entertainment by your attempting to belittle and prove how much more intelligent you think you are."Vrede wrote:You have a rich fantasy life. It didn't piss me off at all, that's why I didn't and still haven't commented on the "point" you mucked up. It wasn't until you made me laugh arguing that your grammar was correct when it obviously wasn't, "dumbass", that I thought it worth the bother. Thanks again.
You made a stupid mistake. Just acknowledge it and move on. When I read it this morning, I assumed you meant "affection" or "affinity," and that you just got auto-corrected, that is until you spent half the day trying to defend your "typo." Yes Stinger's little jpeg's with the dumb ass slogans are childish and annoying, as are the laughing emoticons you and he like to use. You really going to have a pissing contest about it? That's like arguing about which avatar is more pro-gay rights, Vrede's with the rainbow goat or yours with the airbrushed lion.Leo Lyons wrote:Left something out didn't you?Stinger wrote:An afficionado (aficionada) is a person, you dumbass. Here, I'll look it up for you:
aficionado: a person who likes, knows about, and appreciates a usually fervently pursued interest or activity : devotee <aficionados of the bullfight> <movie aficionados>
So, your attempt at a more impressive vocabulary ended up an epic fail of more of your illiteracy. I have "a person" for Kool-Aid Kuties?
a·fi·cio·na·do
noun:
an ardent devotee; fan, enthusiast.
Regardless how you define it, or dance around the definition to suit your needs, you're still King of The Kool-Aid jug, you dumbass.
