... Ariaza acknowledged no wrongdoing and made no monetary payment to the accuser. His only concession was agreeing to pull his own defamation suit against the woman, though he maintained the right to sue her attorney.
:---P
Then, there's a strong possibility that non-consensual sex never occurred.
Previously, San Diego County police investigated the incident and declined to recommend that any charges be filed against anyone. The San Diego County prosecutor’s office then conducted a separate, independent investigation and came to the same conclusion.
Meanwhile, San Diego State University conducted its own “independent conduct” investigation and stated that there were “no findings against Matt Araiza.”
The Broncos' dead money charge for releasing Russell Wilson is larger than the next two closest combined all time, according to the Roster Management System.
Player Team Charge
Russell Wilson, '24 Broncos $85M
Matt Ryan, '22 Falcons $40.5M
Aaron Rodgers, '23 Packers $40.3M
Tom Brady, '23 Buccaneers $35.1M
Carson Wentz, '21 Eagles $33.8M
Dead money is not the same as a buyout, but the two are linked.
O Really wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2024 11:03 am
One article says the Steelers would be a good fit.
Sean Payton's ego made a fundamental mistake in not trying to adjust his offense to his quarterbacks strengths. Not everyone is Drew Brees. He knew who and what Russell Wilson was when he took the job.
Teams in "win now" mode are good candidates, Steelers and Vikings come to mind, although IMO the Steelers would be better off with Justin Fields for the long term. Their window seems perpetual while the Vikings are limited.
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000000101010202020303010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.
O Really wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2024 11:03 amOne article says the Steelers would be a good fit.
Sean Payton's ego made a fundamental mistake in not trying to adjust his offense to his quarterbacks strengths. Not everyone is Drew Brees. He knew who and what Russell Wilson was when he took the job.
Teams in "win now" mode are good candidates, Steelers and Vikings come to mind, although IMO the Steelers would be better off with Justin Fields for the long term. Their window seems perpetual while the Vikings are limited.
... Wilson will sign a team-friendly, one-year deal. The Denver Broncos, who told him last week that he would be released, will wind up paying $38 million of his salary while he wears the black and yellow.
AFC opponent. That's darn nice of them. Opps. He could try coaching for Auburn after he retires from playing
Cool video. Interesting song choice, not sure what to make of that.
... The Steelers' 2024 schedule includes a game in Denver against the Broncos, which now could feature Wilson's return.
Figures. Any bets? I'll go with Pittsburgh.
10-7 last year, lost a playoff game to the Bills. Could be a contendah.
GoCubsGo wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2024 11:45 amSean Payton's ego made a fundamental mistake in not trying to adjust his offense to his quarterbacks strengths. Not everyone is Drew Brees. He knew who and what Russell Wilson was when he took the job.
Teams in "win now" mode are good candidates, Steelers and Vikings come to mind, although IMO the Steelers would be better off with Justin Fields for the long term. Their window seems perpetual while the Vikings are limited.
... And how does this -- as well as the Pittsburgh Steelers landing Russell Wilson -- affect the market for Chicago Bears quarterback Justin Fields, who is expected to be moved to pave the way for the Bears to draft USC's Caleb Williams? ...
What does this -- and the Steelers landing Russell Wilson -- mean for Justin Fields' market?
Sounds like this might be the best option:
... Chicago could keep Fields and a rookie quarterback drafted No. 1 overall on the roster throughout the offseason and trade the 25-year-old when an injury takes out a starter....
Kinda weird to be awaiting injury, but that's true for every backup at every position.
Vrede too wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:14 pm
Kinda weird to be awaiting injury, but that's true for every backup at every position.
As the trade market dries up around them people forget there is no hurry. A preseason and early season audition period may forthcoming unless Caleb Williams blows out Fields.
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000000101010202020303010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.
GoCubsGo wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2024 11:45 am
Teams in "win now" mode are good candidates, Steelers and Vikings come to mind, although IMO the Steelers would be better off with Justin Fields for the long term. Their window seems perpetual while the Vikings are limited.
Bears got hosed, but I wish Justin well, by all accounts he was a good guy and teammate.
The Bears have been very busy, although more work is needed on the O line. Caleb Williams couldn't ask for a better landing spot.
Eamus Catuli~AC 000000000101010202020303010304 020405....Ahhhh, forget it, it's gonna be a while.
... The new alignment rules represent the most significant on-field rule change for the NFL in years and are designed to reverse more than a decade of declining return rates while also lowering concussion rates. In essence, the format will move the majority of the kicking and return teams downfield to minimize high-speed collisions. It will go into effect for one year only in anticipation of possible tweaks over time....
I appreciate the goals and am fine with trying new things. However, traditionalists are going to have a cow. What do y'all think?