Maybe more qualified, but IMO she's not acceptable at all.
"satanic wombs"?

How bad are the nominees when Little Marco gets bipartisan praise?
Maybe more qualified, but IMO she's not acceptable at all.
"satanic wombs"?
'Time to bring the country together': Village People defend decision to perform during Trump inaugural eventsGoCubsGo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:07 pmShe may not survive this.
https://x.com/axios/status/1878855814787502158
Carrie Underwood Faces Backlash After Nabbing Donald Trump Inauguration Gig: 'Incredibly Outrageous'
You may be the winner.
Trisha Yearwood?Supsalemgr wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:23 amFolks complaining about The Village People and Trisha Yearwood performing at the inauguration is just as silly as those complaining about Michelle not attending.
I think he probably means Carrie Underwood.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:51 amTrisha Yearwood?Supsalemgr wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:23 amFolks complaining about The Village People and Trisha Yearwood performing at the inauguration is just as silly as those complaining about Michelle not attending.
Didn't she just perform at Carter's funeral?
LOLO Really wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:25 amI think he probably means Carrie Underwood.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:51 amTrisha Yearwood?Supsalemgr wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:23 amFolks complaining about The Village People and Trisha Yearwood performing at the inauguration is just as silly as those complaining about Michelle not attending.
Didn't she just perform at Carter's funeral?
It would be nice if a performer would be honored to sing at any president's inauguration, regardless of party. I could be wrong (although I was there), but I don't think Fleetwood Mack performing "Don't Stop Believing" at Clinton's inauguration was seen as much of a political statement. But here's a difference: up until around 2017 (OK, exactly 2017) it was customary for a winning candidate to thank his supporters, offer some blather about everyone working together, and pledge to serve everyone regardless of party. Once opponents became "enemies" and petty name-calling, threats, and insults became the norm from the highest offices, then there was no longer much opportunity to smooth over differences. You're either for or against MAGA. You can't be a little bit pregnant.
I mix up all the female country singers. It is Carrie Underwood.GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:51 amTrisha Yearwood?Supsalemgr wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:23 amFolks complaining about The Village People and Trisha Yearwood performing at the inauguration is just as silly as those complaining about Michelle not attending.
Didn't she just perform at Carter's funeral?
Since 2013. Time flies.
Not to mention aging Carrie by 19 years.The other one is Trisha.
Nobody finds it ironic that the replacement members of a band that originally portrayed the very essence of "DEI" is even considered to play at Trump's party, much less actually accepts. Somebody needs some money. Hope they get paid up front or they can join the long line of stiffing victims.Supsalemgr wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:23 amFolks complaining about The Village People and Trisha Yearwood performing at the inauguration is just as silly as those complaining about Michelle not attending.
My odds just improved slightly:GoCubsGo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:28 pmYou may be the winner.
https://x.com/RpsAgainstTrump/status/18 ... 4569623635
I like O Really's 'KINO'. 'Batshit crazy' works, too.Aaron Rodgers Sends Warning to Senate on RFK Jr. Confirmation
... “You better come ready senators, come ready and try and see if you can pull one over on my boy, Bobby, because Bobby’s f---ing smart, dude,” Rodgers said on The Pat McAfee Show....
Rodgers said he was excited to watch RFK Jr.’s hearings “just see who tried to f--- with him.”
... “So it’s going to [be] as he’s doing a service to everybody if you just let him and get the hell out of the way and stop trying to label him as whatever the f--- they want to label him these days,” he continued.
GoKaaronGo!“He just wants to make sure that everything that’s being given to our kids is safe, everything that we’re ingesting on a day-to-day basis is safe, and he’s going to ‘Make America Healthy Again’ or is going to freaking die trying.”
I knew that.... At his confirmation hearing on Thursday, former Rep. Lee Zeldin faced scrutiny of his limited environmental experience. For one senator, Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse, this took the form of a science pop quiz—asking, in his words, “really basic no-tricks questions about climate change.”
Whitehouse started off with a softball: “First, as a matter of law, is carbon dioxide a pollutant?”
... “Senator, while carbon dioxide is not named as one of the six in the Clean Air Act, the EPA has been treating it as such,” Zeldin said, to which Whitehouse noted that the Supreme Court had, in fact, ruled in 2007 that it was a pollutant.
I would not have stuttered.“What effect—briefly and in layman terms, I know you’re not a scientific expert—what effect are carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel combustion having in the atmosphere?” Whitehouse asked.
Declining to answer the question head-on, Zeldin fired back that he is “someone who believes strongly that we should work with the scientists, leaving the science to the scientist, the policy to the policymakers, and that we all work together.”
“I don’t sit before you as a scientist,” Zeldin added. “Fortunately, at EPA we do have many talented scientists who provide that research. They have that talent to be able to tell us exactly what the metrics are of their research—”
Whitehouse cut him off and pressed for a straightforward answer.
“Uh, trapping—trapping heat, senator,” Zeldin stuttered.
Worse.Whitehouse then asked him to name the effects of “methane leakage from fossil fuel production and transport” in the atmosphere.
Zeldin’s response: “Same.”
And acidification and warming leading to coral bleaching, and shifts in food and migratory patterns for some species.“What effect are carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel combustion having in the oceans?” Whitehouse asked.
“Well, the emissions of greenhouse gases, um, trap—trap heat, Senator,” Zeldin reiterated, adding that “rising sea levels are concerns where I’m from as well.”
Unqualified, typical MAGAt.Zeldin had limited experience working on environmental policy as a congressman and, as he noted throughout the hearing, no scientific or climate-related background.
I knew that.Whitehouse continued, asking Zeldin whether the Earth has hit “1.5 degree risk threshold,” adding: “Why is that important?”
Zeldin, who is expected to lift regulations protecting the environment, demurred that he would “defer to the talented scientists to be able to provide that advice on an ongoing basis.”
In fact, the world did hit that threshold of warming, which signals an increased risk of climate-related disasters, for the first time ever in 2024.
Whitehouse asked him to name any key climate “tipping points.” Zeldin, stammering, couldn’t come up with a single one. “I think that as you put up a map of your district and your state, I could put up a map of mine and we could do this across the entire country. As long as that concern exists where there is in fact rising sea levels and I hear from both sides of the aisle... ” Zeldin said before Whitehouse cut him off.
Meh, we need drastic and immediate change, along with mitigation strategies.To finish off the quiz, Whitehouse asked, “are we now on a pathway to climate safety or do we need to do more to reduce carbon emissions in order to get on that pathway?”
Zeldin earned maybe a few partial credit points at best. He concluded that “we will have never done enough to ensure that our water and our air is clean, safe and healthy. Whatever we do every day to achieve this objective, we need to wake up the next day looking for ways to do more.”
. . . and many many other species.
No hope for slowing, halting or reversing that with the Dolt .45 crew.