It's not just education:O Really wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:49 amTurns out if the Dept of Education cuts funds to public schools, the effect would be much more negative on rural areas (which coincidentally mostly voted for Trump) than in urban areas that have higher tax base, more people, etc. to fund their schools. But yeah, Trump loves the uneducated and wants to keep them that way.
How Trump's MAGA Agenda Is Already Sticking It To Red America
The effects of DOGE and potential cuts to Medicaid are likely to hit communities where Donald Trump is popular.
Medicare only covers medical bills. Millions of Americans in nursing homes rely on Medicaid for the other costs. POTUS Musk, PINO and the GQP will kill granny.
Aside, Trumpettes were warned:... “A lot of MAGA is on Medicaid,” (Steve) Bannon said on Thursday on his “War Room” podcast. “If you don’t think so, you are dead wrong. Medicaid is going to be a complicated one. You just can’t take a meat ax to it, although I would love to.”...
This Essential Health Care Program Could Get Hammered If Donald Trump Wins
There are several reasons to think Trump and Republicans might in fact target Medicaid if they get the chance.
Oct 24, 2024
The pain shows up in surprising ways, too:
It's a shame that every red state, county and zip code has blue voters in it, too.... Cuts at USAID might seem less likely to have a perceptible effect stateside, because American jobs don’t generally depend on foreign assistance. But in farm country, they do, because that’s where USAID gets food: Farmers, who voted overwhelmingly for Trump, could lose as much as $2 billion if food aid goes away.
“You’re talking about a direct impact on American products and American jobs,” George Ingram, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, told the Washington Post.
Republican lawmakers from Kansas, Arkansas and other rural states are rallying behind legislation to save the primary food aid program by moving it out of the State Department and over to the Department of Agriculture.
And they aren’t the only GOP lawmakers making the case to protect programs on the Trump target list. Nearly two dozen House Republicans have been lobbying their leadership to spare federal subsidies for electric vehicles that Trump has said he is determined to eliminate.
It’s not the potential of backsliding on climate progress that worries these Republicans. It’s the potential of losing jobs in their districts, which are home to new, sprawling EV factories in what’s become known as the “battery belt” stretching across the South. And what’s true for EVs is true for the clean energy push more generally: The money that President Joe Biden and the Democrats invested in projects like solar and wind power has gone disproportionately to Republican districts.
Take the money away, and it’s those districts that could suffer disproportionately....