Wingnutties out of control!

[GoCubsGo]

We've entered the Twilight Zone,

[1 CAT FAN]

The Democrats onstage saw themselves as morally courageous. American voters, it turned out, saw a group of politicians hopelessly out of touch.

Standing side by side at a primary debate in June 2019, 10 of the party’s candidates for president were asked to raise their hand if they wanted to decriminalize illegal border crossings. Only one of them held still.

Six years later, the party remains haunted by that tableau. It stands both as a vivid demonstration of a leftward policy shift on immigration that many prominent Democratic lawmakers and strategists now say they deeply regret, and as a marker of how sharply the country was moving in the other direction.

Last year, 55 percent of Americans told Gallup that they supported a decrease in immigration, nearly twice as many as in 2020, and the first time since 2005 that a majority had said so. The embrace of a more punitive approach to illegal immigration includes not only white voters but also working-class Latinos, whose support Democrats had long courted with liberal border policies.

“When you have the most Latino district in the country outside of Puerto Rico vote for Trump, that should be a wake-up call for the Democratic Party,” said Representative Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, who saw Mr. Trump win every county in his district along the border with Mexico. “This is a Democratic district that’s been blue for over a century.”

How the Democrats reached this point, and their continued struggles on immigration, is a decades-long story of political failures, missteps, misreadings and misplaced bets — and some shrewd Republican moves.

“We got led astray by the 2016 and the 2020 elections, and we just never moved back,” said Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona, who introduced an immigration and border security plan in May. “We looked feckless, we weren’t decisive, we weren’t listening to voters, and the voters decided that we weren’t in the right when it comes to what was happening with the border.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/06/us/p ... trump.html

[Vrede too]

What is wrong with this actual GOP post?

Spoiler:

Article

The incompetence is staggering.

It's paired with widespread incoherence:

GOP Oversight Member Suggests Smithsonian Hiding Bones of Giants
Rep. Eric Burlison: “I do believe [giants] were real”

In June, Rep. Eric Burlison, a Missouri Republican serving on the House Oversight Committee, appeared on BlazeTV’s Prime Time with Alex Stein, where he discussed his belief that giants once existed. Burlison told Stein he was scheduled to be at “NephCon 2025,” a conference focused on fringe topics including the biblical Nephilim —figures in Genesis that some interpret as the giant offspring of angels and human women....

We've entered the Twilight Zone.

Yep. Ever notice how the real weirdos are all RepuQs?

[GoCubsGo]

Certainly an overwhelming majority.

[bannination]

Yep. Ever notice how the real weirdos are all RepuQs?

.It's certainly a pattern in the flat earth community.

[1 CAT FAN]

The Democrats onstage saw themselves as morally courageous. American voters, it turned out, saw a group of politicians hopelessly out of touch.

Standing side by side at a primary debate in June 2019, 10 of the party’s candidates for president were asked to raise their hand if they wanted to decriminalize illegal border crossings. Only one of them held still.

Six years later, the party remains haunted by that tableau. It stands both as a vivid demonstration of a leftward policy shift on immigration that many prominent Democratic lawmakers and strategists now say they deeply regret, and as a marker of how sharply the country was moving in the other direction.

Last year, 55 percent of Americans told Gallup that they supported a decrease in immigration, nearly twice as many as in 2020, and the first time since 2005 that a majority had said so. The embrace of a more punitive approach to illegal immigration includes not only white voters but also working-class Latinos, whose support Democrats had long courted with liberal border policies.

“When you have the most Latino district in the country outside of Puerto Rico vote for Trump, that should be a wake-up call for the Democratic Party,” said Representative Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, who saw Mr. Trump win every county in his district along the border with Mexico. “This is a Democratic district that’s been blue for over a century.”

How the Democrats reached this point, and their continued struggles on immigration, is a decades-long story of political failures, missteps, misreadings and misplaced bets — and some shrewd Republican moves.

“We got led astray by the 2016 and the 2020 elections, and we just never moved back,” said Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona, who introduced an immigration and border security plan in May. “We looked feckless, we weren’t decisive, we weren’t listening to voters, and the voters decided that we weren’t in the right when it comes to what was happening with the border.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/06/us/p ... trump.html

Isn't the New York Times a left lean?

[Vrede too]

Yep. Ever notice how the real weirdos are all RepuQs?

It's certainly a pattern in the flat earth community.

I look forward to the dissolution of the Cult and the return of "normal" Repubs . . . if I live long enough.

[Vrede too]

If someone is almost universally ignored for 4 months and is not even visible to almost all, does that make her/him an "Interdimensional Being"?

[1 CAT FAN]

Yep. Ever notice how the real weirdos are all RepuQs?

It's certainly a pattern in the flat earth community.

I look forward to the dissolution of the Cult and the return of "normal" Repubs . . . if I live long enough.

Is this y'all role playing?

Photos: 'No Kings' protest draws thousands to downtown Asheville

[Vrede too]

Or, just disturbed and pitiful?

[GoCubsGo]

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson received both her undergraduate and law degrees from Harvard University. She graduated magna cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Government and earned her Juris Doctor (J.D.) from Harvard Law School, graduating cum laude. While at Harvard Law School, she served as a supervising editor of the Harvard Law Review.

Charlie Kirk dropped out of community college.