Leo Lyons wrote:
Just because someone thinks the gay lifestyle is abnormal doesn't make them homophobic (or bigoted)
Interesting term, "abnormal." Just because someone is in a minority doesn't make them abnormal. Do you find left-handers to be "abnormal"? How about redheads?
BTW, what do you consider the "gay lifestyle"? Most of the gay people I've known and had as friends and neighbors had a lifestyle very similar to mine. Maybe I'm gay, despite having heterosexual sex habits.
Being left-handed or red-haired is vastly different from being sexually attracted to one of the same gender. Therefore, one must conclude
that you're a blond(e).
I'm left handed, and don't really understand why everyone else isn't. I am also intrigued by redheads. If she happens to be left handed, that's a plus. Having said that, I don't discriminate, dislike, or hate right handers, blondes, brunettes, raven haired beauties, or homosexuals. Thanks.
The goal was simple: win marriage equality in as many states as possible before the Supreme Court rules on Prop. 8 and DOMA this summer.
Just moments ago, Delaware became the second state in five days to pass marriage equality – and the governor will soon sign it into law.
There are now 51 million people living in states with marriage equality – and with Illinois and Minnesota still on the brink of passing it, we might hit 70 million before the month is over.
The energy is palpable. We're winning, and we need to keep winning...
Together, we're making history. Each and every day.
homerfobe, do you have internet in your closet?
No, but it's obvious you do. You're the one keeping up with queer-shit activities.
Not being a faggot, I have no reason to hide in my closet. Sorry about you.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!
"Georgia's human rights ombudsman, Uchi Nanuashvili, said it is "deplorable" that gay people's constitutional rights were violated on Rustavi Street on Friday." Sorry Ommy, you lost too.
The folks were just standing up for their own rights. Freaks of nature not wanted there.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!
Vrede wrote: In case anyone's keeping track, homerfobe skipped over 22 more current threads to post about his obsession.
Seems you're the only one who keeps track on faggot-goin's on.
and btw.. Only a complete idiot thinks that calling a straight intolerant person "gay" or obsessive is an insult. Makes you rather complete, doesn't it?
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!
Boy Scout organization votes to stop discriminating against members regarding sexual orientation; not so much with leaders, but considering their position just a year ago, it's a big tick-tock.
O Really wrote:Boy Scout organization votes to stop discriminating against members regarding sexual orientation; not so much with leaders, but considering their position just a year ago, it's a big tick-tock.
I heard they were going to give them a choice---add an equine achievement badge and change their name to The Gay Caballeros, or issue them
larger genuine Boy Scout knives and call themselves The Gay Blades.
Stupid ass move; all in the name of political correctness and so-called rights. Straight boys have rights too. They have a right to separate themselves from other boys who's sexual preferences are considered abnormal. Many Boy Scout troops will lose their financial support from the numerous religious organizations that support moral values.
If homo boys want to be scouts, they should form their own organizations; not force themselves into organizations where they are really not welcome.
Leo Lyons wrote:
If homo boys want to be scouts, they should form their own organizations; not force themselves into organizations where they are really not welcome.
It's not "so-called" rights. The courts have already determined that BSA had the right to discriminate, and they didn't change because of legal challenges. They changed because society in general and the views of their various members have changed. Do you really believe that our society would be better off if nobody forced themselves into places they are really not welcome? Like the front of the bus? But there apparently wasn't much problem with "welcomeness" on many local and regional levels - it was the official policy causing the problem, and that's now been mostly fixed. If some sponsors want to back out, fine - there will undoubtedly be others who will step up.
Leo Lyons wrote:
If homo boys want to be scouts, they should form their own organizations; not force themselves into organizations where they are really not welcome.
It's not "so-called" rights. The courts have already determined that BSA had the right to discriminate, and they didn't change because of legal challenges. They changed because society in general and the views of their various members have changed. Do you really believe that our society would be better off if nobody forced themselves into places they are really not welcome? Like the front of the bus? But there apparently wasn't much problem with "welcomeness" on many local and regional levels - it was the official policy causing the problem, and that's now been mostly fixed. If some sponsors want to back out, fine - there will undoubtedly be others who will step up.
The "front of the bus" (or back) is quite a different place from a dark pup tent. They changed because many of their biggest sponsors
(not affilaited with religion) threatened to pull their support. Levi jeans and other big businesses knew that by loudly voicing oppositon to their anti-gay stance would be financially beneficial to their own company's profit line. Views my ass, the whole shittin' mess is nothing but money and greed motivated.
Leo Lyons wrote: Views my ass, the whole shittin' mess is nothing but money and greed motivated.
Could be. So why don't the scouts do their own thing without even trying to attract sponsors? And if they need the sponsors, what's wrong with going along with what they want? NASCAR certainly does. Doesn't it go, "he who has the gold makes the rules?"
Leo Lyons wrote:Comparing the Boy Scouts to NASCAR? Are you kidding?
Well, one is a non-profit organization and the other is a privately owned corporation, but the point is that both of them rely on sponsors (OK, so the teams do, not NASCAR itself) to stay in business. They don't have a direct revenue stream (as compared to Girl Scouts who actually get their parents and all their office mates out to sell cookies), so they have to get money from somewhere. If you take the money, you have to jump the hoops. Money always has strings attached. If the Boy Scouts organization wants to do its own thing without interference, it needs to find its own revenue stream.
VDRed wrote:Could be, homerfobe detests what he's done with that mouth.
Sorry, you stupid twit, you lose again. Calling an intolerant person a queer is only an attempt to draw attention away from yourself. You've already reached rock bottom and now you're really starting to dig. The only thing I've done with my mouth is voice opposition to the proliferation of the nasty sons of bitches, whose deviant lifestyle is like a a flesh-eating cancer, slowing eating away (no pun intended) at the moral fiber of any decency that's left in human society. I wouldn't allow my son to spend one moment near one of those filthy bastards. It appears that the leadership of BSA is nothing more than spineless, cowardly wimps who crumbled under pressure. I hope the BSA crumbles. The only thing left will be the FBA; Faggot Boys of America.
The large F is for emphasizing FAGGOT.
You can even be their mascot.
Proudly Telling It Like It Is: In Your Face! Whether You Like It Or Not!
