Syria/Iraq
- neoplacebo
- Admiral of the Fleet
- Posts: 12435
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
- Location: Kingsport TN
Re: Syria
Not to worry; John McCain is over there now to meet the Syrian rebels. I feel sure he'll stop by Jerusalem or Tel Aviv on his way back and straighten all this out. Besides, he doesn't want Israel to be inconvenienced....that's why he's over there now to generate support for yet another American military misadventure. The last ten years of war are rapidly coming to a close, and Johnny just can't stand it.
- Leo Lyons
- Ensign
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:14 am
Re: Syria
"A number of the Syrians who greeted Senator McCain upon his arrival in Syria asked to take pictures with him, and as always, the senator complied.Vrede wrote:U.S. senator McCain pictured with Syrian rebel kidnapper
Opps.
If the individual photographed with Senator McCain is in fact Mohammad Nour, that is regrettable," spokesman Brian Rogers said.
Oh crap, and Opps indeed; that is regrettable!
- neoplacebo
- Admiral of the Fleet
- Posts: 12435
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
- Location: Kingsport TN
Re: Syria
Not a surprising event to occur on a fool's errand.
- Boatrocker
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2066
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
- Location: Southeast of Disorder
Re: Syria
With all respect for a veteran- a sailor I once admired very much- I seriously suspect it is getting close to time for an Alzheimer's screening. Word to Cindy.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
- Wneglia
- Midshipman
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:00 pm
- Wneglia
- Midshipman
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:00 pm
Re: Syria
If we had taken action soon after Assad began his bloodbath, the rebels likely would not have accepted Al Qaeda's offer of help. At this point, it our support would likely be too little , too late.Vrede wrote:On one side we have Assad, a semi-secularist who has maintained semi-peace with Israel but clearly has to go.
On the other side we have the rebels who the UN thinks have used chemical weapons and who are heavily influenced by foreign and domestic Islamists.
What do you advocate, Wneglia? I'm glad I'm not the one deciding.

- Wneglia
- Midshipman
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:00 pm
Re: Syria
No fly zone.Vrede wrote:20-20 hindsight? The GOP largely opposed Obama's intervention in the easier to contain and far less complex Libyan revolt. Of course, supporting the "right" side, whatever it is, would be far easier if Shrub hadn't mucked things up so thoroughly in the region by invading Iraq.
I think the opposition to Assad has been heavily Islamist from the start, AQ jumped in later.
What do you advocate now, Wneglia, if this is about anything other than just slamming Obama for things no one could predict? You're the one that posted the Clinton (known to dislike Obama) article.

- Wneglia
- Midshipman
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:00 pm
Re: Syria
France and Britain think it is Assad that is using the chemical weapons.Vrede wrote:Okay, thanks, that's military action on behalf of the rebels who the UN thinks have used chemical weapons and who are heavily influenced by foreign and domestic Islamists.
Could be that's the best we can do in our own interests and the interest of justice and future peace, I just don't have your certainty. If I had to pick one thing I'd go with the far less expensive and risky tactic of bribing of Assad to leave for safe haven, along with guarantees from the rebels of of non-retribution against the Alawites, but I don't know how that would turn out, either.

- Wneglia
- Midshipman
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:00 pm
Re: Syria
I agree, but if we could at least keep Assad's air force on the ground, it would perhaps cut down the collateral damage to innocent civilians.Vrede wrote:I know. It seems that absolute proof is still sketchy and that both sides have committed atrocities. That's why I prefer non-military action on our part. Once we start killing people the consequences can be unpredictable, costly and very ugly.

- Wneglia
- Midshipman
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:00 pm
Re: Syria
How many American or Nato planes have been shot down enforcing no fly zones in the past?Cowboy wrote:What if they shoot down some of our planes?Wneglia wrote:I agree, but if we could at least keep Assad's air force on the ground, it would perhaps cut down the collateral damage to innocent civilians.
Then what?

- Stinger
- Sub-Lieutenant
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:18 pm
Re: Syria
McCain and many other Pubs were demanding action on Libya. Of course, when Obama gave aid, the wingnuts exploded with delusions of boots on the grounds, shipments of Marines to Libya, etc., etc., etc. that never happened. I had to correct one just the other day who was claiming Obama started a war. Hypocritical dumbasses.Vrede wrote:20-20 hindsight? The GOP largely opposed Obama's intervention in the easier to contain and far less complex Libyan revolt. Of course, supporting the "right" side, whatever it is, would be far easier if Shrub hadn't mucked things up so thoroughly in the region by invading Iraq.
- Bungalow Bill
- Ensign
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:12 pm
- Location: Downtown Mills River
Re: Syria
Is Clinton back in fifth grade? Let Obama be a wuss, it's better than the alternative
of another muckup in that part of the world. He has been wise to stay out so far,
but I have a feeling that, sooner or later, he will get involved. I hope not. Looking at
the big picture, I'll stick with Assad and Hezbollah.
of another muckup in that part of the world. He has been wise to stay out so far,
but I have a feeling that, sooner or later, he will get involved. I hope not. Looking at
the big picture, I'll stick with Assad and Hezbollah.

- Dryer Vent
- Pilot Officer
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 1:55 pm
Re: Syria
The whole thing is a mess...the whole Middle East is a mess. I can see Obama's point about the chemical weapons, and I can see the problem with the US going in to another situation. On this one, I am just going to trust the President and Congress to decide what to do about this heinous action in Syria. I don't know what they know, so I guess I just have to have faith that our leadership will do the right thing.
- Boatrocker
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2066
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
- Location: Southeast of Disorder
Re: Syria
We need to stay the fuck out of it. How many US-made Stingers, originally given to the mujahidin, did the Taliban end up shooting back at us? A totalitarian Islamic dictatorship against a radical Islamic insurgency; what dog do we have in that fight?Vrede wrote:Syria and Chemical Weapons: What Do We Know?
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
- Boatrocker
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 2066
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:53 am
- Location: Southeast of Disorder
Re: Syria
For teabaggers, any excuse to shoot weapons (and buy more!) is a good one.
People are crazy and times are strange. I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range.
I used to care, but, things have changed.
I used to care, but, things have changed.