Big Brother is Watching You

[Guest]

Racist Partisan62, is that you, or are you some other former BRD now nursemaid-needing CPFer too chicken to ID yourself?

"Tolerance" means legal and institutional tolerance, not that anyone has to be nice to effing lying racist homophobic scumbags. Don't be such an uninformed, definition-challenged and delicate crybaby.

You look so stupid without the context of the original post. Are you too much of a coward to post it?

[Guest]

Banni has it set up like this to differentiate spam from folks too chicken to register like you, it's nothing I have control over.

There is no more Partisan62 on this site, except when you share your disturbed obsession. Are you such a coward that a mere "guest" - a visitor - causes you to react this way? Sad.

Keep replying to phantom posts that no one can see...helps show every one how bad you really are. If you can see them, copy and paste.

[Guest2]

You look so stupid without the context of the original post. Are you too much of a coward to post it?

It's on the same page, dummy. Are you too stupid to make connections between posts without someone leading you by the hand?

Only your posts are visible, you idiot. You look like you are talking to yourself.
After you have been so untrustworthy and despicable on both PMs and IP addresses, why the hell would anyone want to be registered on this site.

[bannination]

You look so stupid without the context of the original post. Are you too much of a coward to post it?

It's on the same page, dummy. Are you too stupid to make connections between posts without someone leading you by the hand?

Only your posts are visible, you idiot. You look like you are talking to yourself.
After you have been so untrustworthy and despicable on both PMs and IP addresses, why the hell would anyone want to be registered on this site.

That's easy, IP's are public knowledge anyway. We instituted a rule that said that's not allowed to help people feel safer. You know, listened to feedback and made changes instead of playing "God Mode".

People want to register here because their opinions won't be censored unlike ahem... other sites. I know that's a reason *not* to register for a lot of Nutjob Conservatives because they NEED the censorship in order to not look stupid, but you know... principles and all that.

[bannination]

Only your posts are visible, you idiot.

I'm pretty sure they are visible to everyone here, moderator or not, that's not too cowardly to register.

You look like you are talking to yourself.

Only to you thanks to your own cowardice.

After you have been so untrustworthy and despicable on both PMs and IP addresses, why the hell would anyone want to be registered on this site.

Your abject fear is noted, and pitied.

None of the moderators have access to IP addresses anymore. Are you still whining about it because you're one of the cowards that got caught lying by stupidly using multiple aliases on an uncensored forum?

There's no rule or ethical restraint against revealing an unsolicited PM and I owed zilch to racist Partisan62, especially when its whole intent was to attack others behind their back without having the cajones to do so to their faces.

Don't be such a crybaby.

To be fair he's attacked us "to our face" on CPF a few times now, probably because he knows we can't call him on it over there without being banned/censored, whatever.

[Ombudsman]

It's a hoot that it's being discussed at all since Ombudsman by mentioning it did the same exact revealing of a private communication...

By mentioning your posting of his PM I did the exact same thing? How exactly is referencing what you did doing the exact same thing?

[Ombudsman]

I'm smart enough to see your and Stinger's desperation to whine about something that never bothered you before. It's hilarious that y'all are so twisted up that you're now defending the likes of Det.Thorn, Mad Roland, and even racist Partisan62.

Speaking of Partisan62:

...but you posting private PM's...

...There's no rule against that (revealing an unsolicited PM) and I owed zilch to racist Partisan62. Interesting that you're defending his privacy now given that you came oh so close to outing his real name. How stupid and hypocritical is that?

Quite ironically, the PM that Ombudsman is griping about my revealing was one attacking himself and Crock Hunter. I have no idea why he thinks there's a responsibility for me to keep private such unsolicited attacks on people that are unaware of their existence, or why he's upset about my letting others know what Partisan62 was sneakily saying about him behind his back.

It's also very, very interesting and hypocritical that you're openly discussing a private post of mine, not that I mind.

That's a pretty good picture of Vrede in the second image, don't you think?

This looks more like something that old fart Quiller from CPF would post. That guy's a real moron who seems to be channeling his inner My Space teen angst side.

[Ombudsman]

So slow. I revealed an unsolicited and sneaky PM attack on you and Crock Hunter. You revealed what I did privately. What's the difference on your planet?

What the hell are you talking about? You posted his PM openly on this site. That's what I was referencing. How does that make me just as guilty?

Maybe you need to take some ginseng or something because something still isn't firing in that little gray head of yours.

[bannination]

Open letter from Edward Snoden's father:

Dear Edward:

I, Bruce Fein, am writing this letter in collaboration with your father in response to the Statement you issued yesterday in Moscow.

Thomas Paine, the voice of the American Revolution, trumpeted that a patriot saves his country from his government.

What you have done and are doing have awakened congressional oversight of the intelligence community from deep slumber; and, had already provoked the introduction of remedial legislation in Congress to curtail spying abuses under section 215 of the Patriot Act and section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. You have forced onto the national agenda the question of whether the American people prefer the right to be left alone from government snooping absent probable cause to believe crime is afoot to vassalage in hopes of a risk-free existence. You are a modern day Paul Revere summoning the American people to confront the growing danger of tyranny and one branch government.

In contrast to your actions, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper responded last March as follows to an unambiguous question raised by Senator Ron Wyden:

“Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?” Clapper testified, “No sire, it does not.” Wyden asked for clarification, and Clapper hedged. “Not wittingly. There are cases where they could inadvertently, perhaps, collect, but not wittingly.”

Director Clapper later defended his stupendous mendacity to the Senator as the least untruthful answer possible. President Obama has not publicly rebuked the Director for frustrating the right of the people to know what their government is doing and to force changes if necessary through peaceful democratic processes. That is the meaning of government by the consent of the governed. “We the people” are sovereign under the U.S. Constitution, and government officials are entrusted with stewardship (not destruction) of our liberties.

We leave it to the American people to decide whether you or Director Clapper is the superior patriot.

The history of civilization is a history of brave men and women refusing to bow to government wrongdoing or injustice, and exalting knowledge, virtue, wisdom, and selflessness over creature comforts as the North Star of life. We believe your actions fall within that honorable tradition, a conviction we believe is shared by many.

As regards your reduction to de facto statelessness occasioned by the Executive Branch to penalize your alleged violations of the Espionage Act, the United Stated Supreme Court lectured in Trop v. Dulles (1958): “The civilized nations of the world are in virtual unanimity that statelessness is not to be imposed as punishment for crime.”

We think you would agree that the final end of the state is to make men and women free to develop their faculties, not to seek planetary domination through force, violence or spying. All Americans should have a fair opportunity to pursue their ambitions. Politics should not be a football game with winners and losers featuring juvenile taunts over fumbles and missteps.

Irrespective of life’s vicissitudes, we will be unflagging in efforts to educate the American people about the impending ruination of the Constitution and the rule of law unless they abandon their complacency or indifference. Your actions are making our challenge easier.

We encourage you to engage us in regular exchanges of ideas or thoughts about approaches to curing or mitigating the hugely suboptimal political culture of the United States. Nothing less is required to pay homage to Valley Forge, Cemetery Ridge, Omaha Beach, and other places of great sacrifice.

Very truly yours,
Bruce Fein, Counsel for Lon Snowden
Lon Snowden

[Guest2]

Only your posts are visible, you idiot.

I'm pretty sure they are visible to everyone here, moderator or not, that's not too cowardly to register.

You look like you are talking to yourself.

Only to you thanks to your own cowardice.

After you have been so untrustworthy and despicable on both PMs and IP addresses, why the hell would anyone want to be registered on this site.

Your abject fear is noted, and pitied.

None of the moderators have access to IP addresses anymore. Are you still whining about it because you're one of the cowards that got caught lying by stupidly using multiple aliases on an uncensored forum?

There's no rule or ethical restraint against revealing an unsolicited PM and I owed zilch to racist Partisan62, especially when its whole intent was to attack others behind their back without having the cajones to do so to their faces.

Don't be such a crybaby.

Nope, my previous posts were NOT visible at the time of your whining; it was hilarious that you appeared to go nuts. Too bad it had to end.
Publicly comparing IP addressed in an attempt to glean and publish personal information is vile and despicable, no matter how you leftists frame it. Looking at IP addresses at all is indicative of a coward who is a failure at debating and has to resort to this kind of underhanded sleaze to get a leg up on an opponent.

You admit that you cannot be trusted with PRIVATE...let me stretch that out so that you can understand....P-R-I-V-A-T-E....messages. Your credibility is shot to hell, and no amount of whining from you will mitigate that.

Perhaps the administrator can change it from "Private Message" to "Maybe private, unless Vrede wants to be a bitch today", just in case.

[Guest2]

Have a great fourth, leftists! Your assignment is to read the Declaration of Independence and reflect on
how you idiot leftists screwed it all up in 237 short years.

[Guest]

I wish you jackwagons would stop using my screen name. I was first to register that name as a forums member.

Get realistic and post with a name you're not afraid to hide behind.

[bannination]

https://pipl.com/

People finder - This was surprisingly accurate for me. Though the 'free' information available for me was much less than I found for others. That made me feel pretty good. I believe if I had unlisted myself from the phone book it wouldn't have even known that much.

[Wneglia]

Clapper's Third Excuse for Misleading Congress About the NSA Is His Best

Should have just gone with the dog ate his notes.

Any guess as to when Clapper will be indicted for perjury?

[bannination]

U.S. Postal Service Logging All Mail for Law Enforcement

[Ombudsman]

What the hell are you talking about? You posted his PM openly on this site.

Got a link, lying, or is something not firing correctly in that little brain of yours?

Yes. http://www.blueridgedebate.com/viewtopi ... 900#p21092

Why would you lie about it and then accuse me of doing the lying? Oh, right.

[Ombudsman]

I did forget that I had posted ex-member's PM openly to prove that he had just lied, sorry. .

That's really all you needed to say. You didn't need to double down on your wackiness by making more shit up.

[Bungalow Bill]

Parti 62 will probably be hiding in a closet somewhere, sobbing, until
the 150th anniversary of Gettysburg is over. You. Lose. Again.

[Ombudsman]

I did forget that I had posted ex-member's PM openly to prove that he had just lied, sorry. .

That's really all you needed to say. You didn't need to double down on your wackiness by making more shit up.

Translation: That's really all I needed to say if I had any interest at all in protecting Ombudsman from his deceptive editing, lie about what I posted, exposure of his "forgetfulness", highlighting of his hypocrisy, and tough questions. I don't.

There was nothing deceptive about my editing. What was deceptive was you claiming I was lying when I said you posted Parti's PM. You made a fool of yourself. You could have come clean and been done with it but you're more like Parti than you seem to realize.

[Ombudsman]

Vrede what color is the sky in your world? I'm not sure I've ever come across anyone more self-deluded.