My point is this: It has been a long established and accepted practice for law enforcement to set up surveillance for everyone in order to try to catch law-breakers. Those going the speed limit, stopping for the sign, under the legal .08 limit, etc. are surveilled and/or recorded just like the violators. There is no difference, in principle, in that and the collection and analysis of phone records. One has no reasonable expectation of privacy when riding on a public road; one has no reasonable expectation of privacy when creating phone company records by making phone calls. So if one is going to argue on the principle of government intrusion by surveilling the innocent as well as actual suspects, one has to argue against speed traps, too. I'll be happy to join in at that level.Vrede wrote:O Really wrote:Excuse me if it's been mentioned earlier, but can somebody tell me where the "Big Brother" people are on this,
I'm one, I and several others have been posting to this thread.
since obviously it's a case of the government not only looking at but stopping everybody, most of whom are "innocent" in the hopes of catching some wrongdoers.
SCOTUS has ruled in favor of limited stops, not much we can do about them at the moment. The issue at the moment is the cops using them to abrogate the Constitution further.
Seems to me the risk of individual danger is greater driving home than making a phone call.
I'm not sure what your point is, please elaborate.
Tangent - I used to drive down PA10 (turns into MD272 at the border - you may know it) and a quarter mile into MD, there was always a state cop hanging out at a deserted gas station, whose sole purpose in life seemed to be to stop everybody coming by with PA plates on their car. I got stopped for 47 in a 45. I told the cop (politely) that I couldn't help it if my speedometer was wrong, but that I didn't intentionally speed - that I along with everyone else knew he was there and had slowed to the speed limit. But the funny (ridiculous) part is that south of there, you get onto some toll roads and bridges, so I had a few bucks on the seat next to me. The cop says, "it's not a good idea to have money in open view when you get stopped." I said, "it's toll money - I'm headed down the JFK - do you really think I'd believe I could bribe a Maryland state cop with 4 dollars?" He goes, "you shouldn't use the term 'bribe' when you're stopped." I just shut up, took my ticket, and moved on.