Ombudsman wrote:"So it's okay for you to denigrate Muslims based on a line from the Koran but when I point out your Bible says the same thing essentially I'm hate filled. Next time stick to your principles and don't discuss religion in the first place, especially if you don't want the counterpoint."
You've "denigerated" religion in many of your other posts.
No more so than you have.
Why do you bother to defend the Muslim religion when you don't believe in God to begin with?
Please post a link to where I've defended Islam.
The only differences is in the name God, who you don't believe in, is called. You take your opinions of the Bible from the writings of old Jewish Law;
my opinions come from modern day news articles wherein many quotes from Muslims and their practices were taken.
Modern-day Christians don't behead non-believers; Muslims do.
No they shoot them outside abortion clinics, harass them at funerals, and bomb federal buildings. The difference between you and I is I don't assume all Christians support the things that some of them do.
My principles are firmly in place, thank you.[/quote]
Ombudsman wrote:"No more so than you have." Please post a link where I have "denigerated" religion.
"Please post a link to where I've defended Islam." Let's start with this one.
"No they shoot them outside abortion clinics, harass them at funerals, and bomb federal buildings.
The difference between you and I is I don't assume all Christians support the things that some of them do." If you've read any of my past posts prior to my last joining this board; you would have read where I stated many times that there is a world of difference between a true Christian,
and one who calls him/herself a Christian. The difference between you and I is that I don't assume that Americans committing acts of terror are Christians just because they claim they are.
Muslims openly pronounce their vile deeds were in God's name too.....and they are still Muslim in their practices.
"My principles are firmly in place, thank you." That's good to know.
Ombudsman wrote:"No more so than you have." Please post a link where I have "denigerated" religion.
A few posts back you said, "They believe the only good non-Muslim is a dead non-Muslim."
"Please post a link to where I've defended Islam." Let's start with this one.
You didn't include a link. Does that mean you couldn't find an example?
"No they shoot them outside abortion clinics, harass them at funerals, and bomb federal buildings.
The difference between you and I is I don't assume all Christians support the things that some of them do." If you've read any of my past posts prior to my last joining this board; you would have read where I stated many times that there is a world of difference between a true Christian,
and one who calls him/herself a Christian. The difference between you and I is that I don't assume that Americans committing acts of terror are Christians just because they claim they are.
Muslims openly pronounce their vile deeds were in God's name too.....and they are still Muslim in their practices.
Yes that's what's known as the "No True Scotsman Fallacy." You appoint yourself as judge of who you want to call a true Christian and who you do not. Meanwhile you assume all Muslims want all non-Muslims dead.
Ombudsman wrote:"No more so than you have." Please post a link where I have "denigerated" religion.
"Please post a link to where I've defended Islam." Let's start with this one.
"No they shoot them outside abortion clinics, harass them at funerals, and bomb federal buildings.
The difference between you and I is I don't assume all Christians support the things that some of them do." If you've read any of my past posts prior to my last joining this board; you would have read where I stated many times that there is a world of difference between a true Christian,
and one who calls him/herself a Christian. The difference between you and I is that I don't assume that Americans committing acts of terror are Christians just because they claim they are.
Muslims openly pronounce their vile deeds were in God's name too.....and they are still Muslim in their practices.
"My principles are firmly in place, thank you." That's good to know.
bb, that's just palin and simple weird. you refuse to accept an individual christian terrorist can be a true Christian
okay – sorta makes sense
but, you believe that an individual muslim terrorist is a true muslim
do you get dizzy?
sure the crazy muslims pronounce their deeds in God’s name, but then so do the crazy Christians.
In the courtroom, Presbyterian preacher from Pensacola, Paul Hill, listens to his death sentence with a big shit eating grin and proclaims he committed the murders in God’s name and would gladly do so again
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”
bb also leaves out the not so publicized but substantial efforts of the mainstream evangelical wackos to fund Israel’s war against muslims in order to hasten some sort of sky-fairy 2nd cuming.
But then bb probably sends in his contribution to that end to the world genocidal extermination of all who don’t believe just like him
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”
billy.pilgrim wrote:bb also leaves out the not so publicized but substantial efforts of the mainstream evangelical wackos to fund Israel’s war against muslims in order to hasten some sort of sky-fairy 2nd cuming.
Good point, but B has succeeded in killing the "Just for Fun" thread. How very Cromwellish of him.
The non-religious recognize the same thing that the religious do--people are far from
perfect and that most will not live strictly by their respective religious tenets, so don't
expect the great majority of Muslims to go around killing non-Muslims or the great majority
of Christians to turn the other cheek. That's simply a recognition of human behavior.
I believe 9/11 was the high point of Islamic radicalism. Will there be the occasional, less
significant, terrorist attack? Sure, but the worst is behind us.
Ombudsman wrote:"Good point, but B has succeeded in killing the "Just for Fun" thread. How very Cromwellish of him."
Mr.B from page 12 wrote:"This thread is entitled "Just for Fun".....that's all it is; no opinion one way or the other."
billy.pilgrim wrote:"bb, that's just palin and simple weird."
You a fan Of Sarah's? btw...it's Mr.B
I wasn't referring to your name, bb
as for the palin and simple bimbo weather girl - I do appreciate her one and only accomplishment - she did convince thinking people that some 50 million people on the right place their party above their country and even above their own personal safety.
what a maroon
Trump: “We had the safest border in the history of our country - or at least recorded history. I guess maybe a thousand years ago it was even better.”
Ombudsman wrote:You didn't include a link. Does that mean you couldn't find an example?
Why create a link when all you need to do is roll that
little scrolly-hickey on your mouse?
Because I haven't defended Islam so rolling that little scrolly-hickey thing back won't make a difference? Are you more or less honest than Vrede. If more so then post a link to any post I've made defending Islam or admit you made a mistake.
