O. J. Simpson - Casey Anthony - George Zimmerman

[Roland Deschain]

You can speak for the jury, now, eh? I made no assumption, the facts are clear,......

Not speaking for anyone, just stating a FACT...the jury acquitted Zimmerman. On the other hand, you have made several very broad ASSumptions that are in direct contradiction to the FACTS in this case. Try again.

Nope. Nor can you show one.

Hmm let's review shall we:

There was more evidence to imply that Zimmerman was, indeed the provocateur, not the victim

There was, was there??? It would see that the the Florida legal system disagrees with you. Again, please tell us how it went in the courtroom all those days. Either do that, or go fuck yourself because all you are operating on is your personal opinions based on ASSumptions.

[Boatrocker]

You can speak for the jury, now, eh? I made no assumption, the facts are clear,......

Not speaking for anyone, just stating a FACT...the jury acquitted Zimmerman. On the other hand, you have made several very broad ASSumptions that are in direct contradiction to the FACTS in this case. Try again.

Nope. Nor can you show one.

Hmm let's review shall we:

There was more evidence to imply that Zimmerman was, indeed the provocateur, not the victim

There was, was there??? It would see that the the Florida legal system disagrees with you. Again, please tell us how it went in the courtroom all those days. Either do that, or go fuck yourself because all you are operating on is your personal opinions based on ASSumptions.

LOL! As opposed to the shit you keep putting up? Are we talking about facts, or the Florida legal system (an oxymoron if ever there was)? As ALWAYS, you whine about apples or oranges, then go off on sparkplugs. Fuck YOURself; I doubt anyone else will.

[O Really]

Hmm let's review shall we:

There was more evidence to imply that Zimmerman was, indeed the provocateur, not the victim

There was, was there??? It would see that the the Florida legal system disagrees with you. Again, please tell us how it went in the courtroom all those days. Either do that, or go fuck yourself because all you are operating on is your personal opinions based on ASSumptions.

Actually, there was. But that wasn't the point. Whatever the preponderance of evidence, the jury had to find "beyond reasonable doubt" and they didn't. The evidence that Zimmerman started the altercation was in his calls to police, and in his un-disputed action in leaving his car. But since - and only since - the only other witness was dead, they could not avoid "reasonable doubt." Same thing with OJ - the doubt was created by the glove "if it don't fit, you must acquit." Otherwise most of the evidence was against him. Same with the LA cops beating on Rodney King - on videotape, but the jurors got "reasonable doubt" that they actually intended to kill him. Same with Casey Anthony - lots of evidence, but still - in the minds of those particular jurors - "reasonable doubt."

[Roland Deschain]

LOL! As opposed to the shit you keep putting up? Are we talking about facts, or the Florida legal system (an oxymoron if ever there was)? As ALWAYS, you whine about apples or oranges, then go off on sparkplugs. Fuck YOURself; I doubt anyone else will.

Verdict is what it is. Apparently you had some person stake in it and lost. All I have posted is that the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Zim was guilty of anything. You lost...get over it. Can't help but notice you still haven't offered up anything detailing your courtroom experiences during the trial, yet you keep on flapping them gums. Look on the bright side...you have a lot in common with Florida...you are both full of hot air.

[Boatrocker]

LOL! As opposed to the shit you keep putting up? Are we talking about facts, or the Florida legal system (an oxymoron if ever there was)? As ALWAYS, you whine about apples or oranges, then go off on sparkplugs. Fuck YOURself; I doubt anyone else will.

Verdict is what it is. Apparently you had some person stake in it and lost. All I have posted is that the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Zim was guilty of anything. You lost...get over it. Can't help but notice you still haven't offered up anything detailing your courtroom experiences during the trial, yet you keep on flapping them gums. Look on the bright side...you have a lot in common with Florida...you are both full of hot air.

You are a stupidass, even among a demographic known for its collective stupidity, aren't you? The discussion does not concern the trial; it concerns the facts. I guess that's as mystifying to you as percentages were on the SHJ forum. Lemme dumb it down for ya:

1) Zimmerman did everything he was asked not to do. He carried a gun. He stalked the "suspect." He got out of the truck.
2) Trayvon Martin did not stalk Zimmerman.
3) Zimmerman either had his gun out or had it in another location other than the rear waistband of his skirt. He DID NOT reach back and pull it out while he was on his back, allegedly getting pounded into the pavement by someone sitting on top of him. Zimmerman is a fucking liar.
4) That alleged assbeating was so serious Zimmerman declined to go to the ER.
5) Trayvon Martin was lying on his back a good distance from the sidewalk.
6) No blood on Zimmerman, who claims he shot a man sitting on top of him. Zimmerman is a fucking liar.
7) SYG laws are nothing more than another attempt to make it legal to kill colored folks in the cracker-ass, redneck, hillbilly, white-trash states that are so gung-ho for them.
8) SYG laws are intentionally clouded with vague wording.
9) Yes, Zimmerman's shysters didn't make a SYG defense, but it turned up in jury conversations, so you can't whine that it wasn't relevant.
10) Florida's asshole teabagger governor is resisting any call to revisit the SYG wording in the wake of Trayvon Martin's murder, even as Florida reinforces the notion that as long as you kill the other fellow, you can sleaze out under equally vague "reasonable doubt" wording, also in Florida law. Them FL crackers have a substantially different definition of "reasonable" than I do.

[Ombudsman]

LOL! As opposed to the shit you keep putting up? Are we talking about facts, or the Florida legal system (an oxymoron if ever there was)? As ALWAYS, you whine about apples or oranges, then go off on sparkplugs. Fuck YOURself; I doubt anyone else will.

Verdict is what it is. Apparently you had some person stake in it and lost. All I have posted is that the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Zim was guilty of anything. You lost...get over it. Can't help but notice you still haven't offered up anything detailing your courtroom experiences during the trial, yet you keep on flapping them gums. Look on the bright side...you have a lot in common with Florida...you are both full of hot air.

Do you fantasize a lot about shooting people? I get the feeling you do.

[Boatrocker]

The crackers will conjure up anything to excuse their token Hispanic's murder of an unarmed minor. Wingnuts are scum.

[Ombudsman]

The crackers will conjure up anything to excuse their token Hispanic's murder of an unarmed minor. Wingnuts are scum.

Be sure to read the comments at the bottom. It's like none of those idiots realize the article is mocking the claim.

[Boatrocker]

The crackers will conjure up anything to excuse their token Hispanic's murder of an unarmed minor. Wingnuts are scum.

Be sure to read the comments at the bottom. It's like none of those idiots realize the article is mocking the claim.

Satire, like its cousin- irony, usually sails over wingnut heads by a healthy margin of safety.

[Roland Deschain]

You are a stupidass, even among a demographic known for its collective stupidity, aren't you? The discussion does not concern the trial; it concerns the facts. I guess that's as mystifying to you as percentages were on the SHJ forum. Lemme dumb it down for ya:

1) Zimmerman did everything he was asked not to do. He carried a gun. He stalked the "suspect." He got out of the truck.
2) Trayvon Martin did not stalk Zimmerman.
3) Zimmerman either had his gun out or had it in another location other than the rear waistband of his skirt. He DID NOT reach back and pull it out while he was on his back, allegedly getting pounded into the pavement by someone sitting on top of him. Zimmerman is a fucking liar.
4) That alleged assbeating was so serious Zimmerman declined to go to the ER.
5) Trayvon Martin was lying on his back a good distance from the sidewalk.
6) No blood on Zimmerman, who claims he shot a man sitting on top of him. Zimmerman is a fucking liar.
7) SYG laws are nothing more than another attempt to make it legal to kill colored folks in the cracker-ass, redneck, hillbilly, white-trash states that are so gung-ho for them.
8) SYG laws are intentionally clouded with vague wording.
9) Yes, Zimmerman's shysters didn't make a SYG defense, but it turned up in jury conversations, so you can't whine that it wasn't relevant.
10) Florida's asshole teabagger governor is resisting any call to revisit the SYG wording in the wake of Trayvon Martin's murder, even as Florida reinforces the notion that as long as you kill the other fellow, you can sleaze out under equally vague "reasonable doubt" wording, also in Florida law. Them FL crackers have a substantially different definition of "reasonable" than I do.

Quite the language laced, racist rant you got there. Too bad not a single word of it makes a hill of beans difference. So again..please enlighten us as to just how all those days in the courtroom went.

[Ombudsman]

Mad Roland views this case like some sort of sporting event. He seems to think the outcome proves Zimmerman the better man when in fact all it proves is that he go away with it, due partially to the Florida justice system being in great need of reform, and partially due to a six member jury finding reasonable doubt. Doubt of guilt does not prove innocence.

[billy.pilgrim]

Mad Roland views this case like some sort of sporting event. He seems to think the outcome proves Zimmerman the better man when in fact all it proves is that he go away with it, due partially to the Florida justice system being in great need of reform, and partially due to a six member jury finding reasonable doubt. Doubt of guilt does not prove innocence.

mad rollie and the zim the better man

kinda funny that most racists are too cowardly to stand up and admit their racism. ol rollie stands and praises the legal system for the zimmer trail, but runs and hides when asked to admit that oj deserved his aquital every bit as much as zimmer; after all, the jury acquitted both

[Roland Deschain]

Mad Roland views this case like some sort of sporting event. He seems to think the outcome proves Zimmerman the better man when in fact all it proves is that he go away with it, due partially to the Florida justice system being in great need of reform, and partially due to a six member jury finding reasonable doubt. Doubt of guilt does not prove innocence.

mad rollie and the zim the better man

kinda funny that most racists are too cowardly to stand up and admit their racism. ol rollie stands and praises the legal system for the zimmer trail, but runs and hides when asked to admit that oj deserved his aquital every bit as much as zimmer; after all, the jury acquitted both

Oh I'm sorry bilbo were you talking?? I haven't ran away, I just declined from comment because unlike the Zimmerman trial, I know very little about the OJ situation, other than he was accused and acquitted of murdering his girlfriend. So to answer your question in my terms...don't know, don't care.

[Ombudsman]

Mad Roland views this case like some sort of sporting event. He seems to think the outcome proves Zimmerman the better man when in fact all it proves is that he go away with it, due partially to the Florida justice system being in great need of reform, and partially due to a six member jury finding reasonable doubt. Doubt of guilt does not prove innocence.

mad rollie and the zim the better man

kinda funny that most racists are too cowardly to stand up and admit their racism. ol rollie stands and praises the legal system for the zimmer trail, but runs and hides when asked to admit that oj deserved his aquital every bit as much as zimmer; after all, the jury acquitted both

Oh I'm sorry bilbo were you talking?? I haven't ran away, I just declined from comment because unlike the Zimmerman trial, I know very little about the OJ situation, other than he was accused and acquitted of murdering his girlfriend. So to answer your question in my terms...don't know, don't care.

Rather pathetic cop out but par for the course.

[Roland Deschain]

Ex-wife, and Ronald Goldman. Are you really that young? Then a civil court awarded a judgment against Simpson for their wrongful deaths based on the "preponderance of evidence" standard. Was Casey Anthony vindicated?

No I'm not "that young" I just didn't give a crap about the OJ trial and didn't watch or pay attention to it....same with Casey Anthony didn't care, didn't watch, don't know what evidence was presented etc and don't have an opinion.

[billy.pilgrim]

Mad Roland views this case like some sort of sporting event. He seems to think the outcome proves Zimmerman the better man when in fact all it proves is that he go away with it, due partially to the Florida justice system being in great need of reform, and partially due to a six member jury finding reasonable doubt. Doubt of guilt does not prove innocence.

mad rollie and the zim the better man

kinda funny that most racists are too cowardly to stand up and admit their racism. ol rollie stands and praises the legal system for the zimmer trail, but runs and hides when asked to admit that oj deserved his aquital every bit as much as zimmer; after all, the jury acquitted both

Oh I'm sorry bilbo were you talking?? I haven't ran away, I just declined from comment because unlike the Zimmerman trial, I know very little about the OJ situation, other than he was accused and acquitted of murdering his girlfriend. So to answer your question in my terms...don't know, don't care.

"know very little" rollie, you prove yourself a liar and a coward every time you post

[Roland Deschain]

"know very little" rollie, you prove yourself a liar and a coward every time you post

Your opinion and you are entitled to it....don't change the fact that I didn't watch the OJ trial and don't care.

[billy.pilgrim]

"know very little" rollie, you prove yourself a liar and a coward every time you post

Your opinion and you are entitled to it....don't change the fact that I didn't watch the OJ trial and don't care.

rollie the typical tea bagger - just another little wimp hiding behind lie after lie

[Roland Deschain]

Okay, utter obliviousness is your defense, or you're just a "coward" ducking the question. Either way, thank you.

You're welcome.

[Mr.B]

Where's the protesters to fill the streets? Where's the furious forums posts about a cowardly killer?

A Black man, who is a registered sex offender in Cleveland, is arrested and accused of murdering 3 (so far) young Black women and hiding their bodies in trash bags..... Link

Why aren't the protesters and the Black community up in arms over this; particularly since this scum was an ex-con and a sex offender?

Where's the protests and forum screechers over Ariel Castro's (a Hispanic) imprisonment of three White girls for over a decade?

Selective protesting and screeching?