The LEO thread

Generally an unmoderated forum for discussion of pretty much any topic. The focus however, is usually politics.
Post Reply
Supsalemgr
Marshal
Posts: 932
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by Supsalemgr »

Vrede wrote:Yes, I hear how much you love the prison-industrial complex, corporate welfare, and mistreatment of workers and prisoners. That's how so-called cons are with our tax dollars.

Btw, GEO Group contracts with the feds, particularly ICE, not just "local governments". This is something you would have easily and rapidly learned if you weren't such a slacker.

As for your childish "STFU about it." - Sorry, we're not on your nursemaid forum. Did you get confused? Go crawl into Solar's lap, latch onto a nipple and whimper to him.
Vrede posted:

"Btw, GEO Group contracts with the feds, particularly ICE, not just "local governments". This is something you would have easily and rapidly learned if you weren't such a slacker."

I appreciate your confirming the feds are inefficient in your view. That is certainly a different opinion from you. Now back to the point. What the CEO is paid is none of your business if you do not own stock in that company.

Supsalemgr
Marshal
Posts: 932
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by Supsalemgr »

Vrede wrote:
Supsalemgr wrote:I appreciate your confirming the feds are inefficient in your view. That is certainly a different opinion from you.

No, it isn't. As you well know I've always been an opponent of the tax dollar abuse by the military and prison-industrial complexes. Why are you such a liar when you're laziness causes you to screw up?

Now back to the point. What the CEO is paid is none of your business if you do not own stock in that company.

Your infantile and ignorant "point" was that I should "STFU about it" unless my "local governments" were contractors. I get that you don't care when the feds dole out billions to corporate fat cats but I do.

You should stick with your other point - your fawning love for the wasteful prison-industrial complex, corporate welfare, and mistreatment of workers and prisoners.
Don't sweat it, none of us expect honesty or accountability from a Big Insurance hack.
Vrede is so predictable. Always end up with disparaging remarks.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23182
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by O Really »

I'm happy to buy into Super-S's "none of your business" if he agrees that the same principle applies to gay people getting married, women getting abortions, and personal drug use. If he did that, I could figure he's strongly in favor of individual liberties and that if he's not personally affected by the gay guys getting married or the salary of the executive, then he's at least logically consistent. But if he thinks that society as a whole is affected by what an individual does, then corporation's exec comp is decidely a topic of the public's business.

Mr.B
A bad person.
Posts: 4891
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:22 pm

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by Mr.B »

bannination wrote: "Wow, the people running the prisons are the ones that should be *in* prison."
Uhhhh.....they are....They don't run it from the exercise yard..... :shock:

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12446
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by neoplacebo »

Supsalemgr wrote:
Vrede wrote:
Supsalemgr wrote:I appreciate your confirming the feds are inefficient in your view. That is certainly a different opinion from you.

No, it isn't. As you well know I've always been an opponent of the tax dollar abuse by the military and prison-industrial complexes. Why are you such a liar when you're laziness causes you to screw up?

Now back to the point. What the CEO is paid is none of your business if you do not own stock in that company.

Your infantile and ignorant "point" was that I should "STFU about it" unless my "local governments" were contractors. I get that you don't care when the feds dole out billions to corporate fat cats but I do.

You should stick with your other point - your fawning love for the wasteful prison-industrial complex, corporate welfare, and mistreatment of workers and prisoners.
Don't sweat it, none of us expect honesty or accountability from a Big Insurance hack.
Vrede is so predictable. Always end up with disparaging remarks.
Only because you're so eminently disparageable.

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5592
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by bannination »

Mr.B wrote:
bannination wrote: "Wow, the people running the prisons are the ones that should be *in* prison."
Uhhhh.....they are....They don't run it from the exercise yard..... :shock:
Ha.... you got me...
:-||

Supsalemgr
Marshal
Posts: 932
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by Supsalemgr »

O Really wrote:I'm happy to buy into Super-S's "none of your business" if he agrees that the same principle applies to gay people getting married, Doesn't bother me although I prefer the civil union route with the same civil rights of marriage.women getting abortions,A legal medical procedure. I personally am opposed to most abortions, but the outcome is between God and the person choosing the abortion. and personal drug useDoesn't bother me, but if it is illegal the perpetrators take their own chances. If he did that, I could figure he's strongly in favor of individual liberties and that if he's not personally affected by the gay guys getting married or the salary of the executive, then he's at least logically consistent. But if he thinks that society as a whole is affected by what an individual does, then corporation's exec comp is decidely a topic of the public's business.

User avatar
Crock Hunter
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:40 pm
Location: THIS USER IS BANNED

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by Crock Hunter »

Vrede wrote: Once again, he's the mewling hypocrisy champ!
You have to wonder why supper and friends ever venture from the safety of their protected forums.. .
`~~~:< .. Welcome to the Swamp.. .. Swim Fast..

bannination
Captain
Posts: 5592
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:58 am
Location: Hendersonville
Contact:

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by bannination »

Crock Hunter wrote:
Vrede wrote: Once again, he's the mewling hypocrisy champ!
You have to wonder why supper and friends ever venture from the safety of their protected forums.. .
Hit and run trolling :>

User avatar
Crock Hunter
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:40 pm
Location: THIS USER IS BANNED

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by Crock Hunter »

bannination wrote:
Crock Hunter wrote:
Vrede wrote: Once again, he's the mewling hypocrisy champ!
You have to wonder why supper and friends ever venture from the safety of their protected forums.. .
Hit and run trolling :>
LOL... "run" being the operative word.. .. .
`~~~:< .. Welcome to the Swamp.. .. Swim Fast..

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23182
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by O Really »

Some in LA Sheriff Department seemed to forget about the "protect and serve" part... http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news ... probe?lite

User avatar
Ombudsman
Ensign
Posts: 1268
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:03 pm

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by Ombudsman »

Bad Leo.
(CNN) -- Eighteen current and former Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department deputies were indicted as part of an FBI investigation into alleged civil rights abuses and corruption, federal prosecutors said Monday.
Sixteen of them made initial appearances in federal court in Los Angeles Monday afternoon, with two others schedule to go before a judge later in the day.

The two-year FBI probe focused on allegations that sheriff's officials had fostered a culture in which deputies were permitted to beat and humiliate inmates and cover up misconduct at the nation's largest county jail.
"Our investigation also found that these incidents did not take place in a vacuum -- in fact, they demonstrated behavior that had become institutionalized," U.S. Attorney André Birotte Jr. said. "The pattern of activity alleged in the obstruction of justice case shows how some members of the Sheriff's Department considered themselves to be above the law."
http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/09/justice/l ... ?hpt=hp_t2
Wing nuts. Not just for breakfast anymore.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23182
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by O Really »

I think I saw an advert for a Kim Jong Un webinar on how to implement and manage a death penalty.

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12446
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by neoplacebo »

Fascinating. I like the way they implement it post haste. I bet they even send a bill for the bullets to the family.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23182
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by O Really »

Yeah, but during Bike Weeks in Daytona, they tell a lot of them to put them back down, too. I guess it evens out. :lol:

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23182
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by O Really »

Vrede wrote:Just the gay male and straight female cops do that. :D
Maybe, but a lot of spectators do too. Have you seen some of those women on the backs of some of those bikes? It's rarely the hot ones who doff the top. :shock:

User avatar
Wneglia
Midshipman
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:00 pm

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by Wneglia »


User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23182
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by O Really »

Can we even count what's wrong with that story? Starting with how does one manage to "frisk" as suspect and "miss" a .45? Most police don't issue a .45, but the ones issued by Durham were/are (.45 ACP) SIG-Sauer P220-1 pistol, (.45 ACP) S&W Model 4506d, and (.45 ACP) S&W M&P45. It's not like you can stick these in your sock. Notice the passive voice in (the recording device) "...was not on." Is it required to run it during an arrest or not? If so, what happened? I call BS on the whole cockameemie story.

User avatar
O Really
Admiral
Posts: 23182
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by O Really »

Officially condoned prison abuse of prisoners with mental health issues in South Carolina...
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/arc ... picks=true

User avatar
neoplacebo
Admiral of the Fleet
Posts: 12446
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Kingsport TN

Re: The LEO thread

Unread post by neoplacebo »

I saw a story from Atlanta on ABC earlier that a 71 year old retired cop pulled out his gun, shot, and killed another movie patron who he'd been arguing with about texting on his phone during the movie; I thought to myself; "another good guy with a bad gun."
Opps! This actually happened in (can you believe it?) Florida; guess the report I saw was from a guy reporting from Atlanta. Sorry, folks.....back to the weather.

Post Reply